Export limit exceeded: 372138 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.

Search

Search Results (372138 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2024-47013 1 Google 1 Android 2025-07-24 7.8 High
In pmucal_rae_handle_seq_int of flexpmu_cal_rae.c, there is a possible arbitrary write due to uninitialized data. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
CVE-2024-47014 1 Google 1 Android 2025-07-24 8.8 High
Android before 2024-10-05 on Google Pixel devices allows privilege escalation in the ABL component, A-330537292.
CVE-2024-47015 1 Google 1 Android 2025-07-24 5.5 Medium
In ProtocolMiscHwConfigChangeAdapter::GetData() of protocolmiscadapter.cpp, there is a possible out-of-bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local information disclosure with baseband firmware compromise required. User Interaction is not needed for exploitation.
CVE-2024-47016 1 Google 1 Android 2025-07-24 7.8 High
there is a possible privilege escalation due to an insecure default value. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
CVE-2024-47030 1 Google 2 Android, Pixel 2025-07-24 5.1 Medium
Android before 2024-10-05 on Google Pixel devices allows information disclosure in the ACPM component, A-315191818.
CVE-2024-47031 1 Google 2 Android, Pixel 2025-07-24 7.4 High
Android before 2024-10-05 on Google Pixel devices allows privilege escalation in the ABL component, A-329163861.
CVE-2024-11624 1 Google 1 Android 2025-07-24 7.8 High
there is a possible to add apps to bypass VPN due to Undeclared Permission . This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
CVE-2024-47032 1 Google 1 Android 2025-07-24 7.8 High
In construct_transaction_from_cmd of lwis_ioctl.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
CVE-2024-53833 1 Google 1 Android 2025-07-24 7.8 High
In prepare_response_locked of lwis_transaction.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
CVE-2024-53834 1 Google 1 Android 2025-07-24 7.5 High
In sms_DisplayHexDumpOfPrivacyBuffer of sms_Utilities.c, there is a possible out of bounds read due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to remote information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
CVE-2024-53835 1 Google 1 Android 2025-07-24 7.8 High
there is a possible biometric bypass due to an unusual root cause. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
CVE-2024-53836 1 Google 1 Android 2025-07-24 6.7 Medium
In wbrc_bt_dev_write of wb_regon_coordinator.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
CVE-2024-53837 1 Google 1 Android 2025-07-24 7.8 High
In prepare_response of lwis_periodic_io.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
CVE-2024-53838 1 Google 1 Android 2025-07-24 7.8 High
In Exynos_parsing_user_data_registered_itu_t_t35 of VendorVideoAPI.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
CVE-2024-53839 1 Google 1 Android 2025-07-24 5.5 Medium
In GetCellInfoList() of protocolnetadapter.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local information disclosure with baseband firmware compromise required. User Interaction is not needed for exploitation.
CVE-2024-53840 1 Google 1 Android 2025-07-24 7.8 High
there is a possible biometric bypass due to an unusual root cause. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
CVE-2024-53841 1 Google 1 Android 2025-07-24 7.8 High
In startListeningForDeviceStateChanges, there is a possible Permission Bypass due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
CVE-2024-53842 1 Google 1 Android 2025-07-24 9.8 Critical
In cc_SendCcImsInfoIndMsg of cc_MmConManagement.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
CVE-2025-29480 1 Osgeo 1 Gdal 2025-07-24 5.5 Medium
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in gdal 3.10.2 allows a local attacker to cause a denial of service via the OGRSpatialReference::Release function. NOTE: the Supplier indicates that the report is invalid and could not be reproduced.
CVE-2024-11403 1 Libjxl Project 1 Libjxl 2025-07-24 9.8 Critical
There exists an out of bounds read/write in LibJXL versions prior to commit 9cc451b91b74ba470fd72bd48c121e9f33d24c99. The JPEG decoder used by the JPEG XL encoder when doing JPEG recompression (i.e. if using JxlEncoderAddJPEGFrame on untrusted input) does not properly check bounds in the presence of incomplete codes. This could lead to an out-of-bounds write. In jpegli which is released as part of the same project, the same vulnerability is present. However, the relevant buffer is part of a bigger structure, and the code makes no assumptions on the values that could be overwritten. The issue could however cause jpegli to read uninitialised memory, or addresses of functions.