Export limit exceeded: 363851 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 363851 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (363851 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-66862 | 1 Gnu | 1 Binutils | 2026-01-14 | 7.5 High |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability in function gnu_special in file cplus-dem.c in BinUtils 2.26 allows attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted PE file. | ||||
| CVE-2025-66861 | 1 Gnu | 1 Binutils | 2026-01-14 | 2.5 Low |
| An issue was discovered in function d_unqualified_name in file cp-demangle.c in BinUtils 2.26 allowing attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted PE file. | ||||
| CVE-2025-63927 | 1 Airpig2011 | 1 Iec104 | 2026-01-14 | 4 Medium |
| A heap-use-after-free vulnerability exists in airpig2011 IEC104 thru Commit be6d841 (2019-07-08). During multi-threaded client execution, the function Iec10x_Scheduled can access memory that has already been freed, potentially causing program crashes or undefined behavior. This may be exploited to trigger a denial-of-service or memory corruption. | ||||
| CVE-2025-63929 | 1 Airpig2011 | 1 Iec104 | 2026-01-14 | 7.5 High |
| A null pointer dereference vulnerability exists in airpig2011 IEC104 thru Commit be6d841 (2019-07-08). When multiple threads enqueue elements concurrently via IEC10X_PrioEnQueue, the function may dereference a null or freed queue pointer, resulting in a segmentation fault and potential denial-of-service. | ||||
| CVE-2025-63872 | 1 Deepseek | 2 Deepseek, Deepseek-v3 | 2026-01-14 | 6.1 Medium |
| DeepSeek V3.2 has a Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability, which allows JavaScript execution through model-generated SVG content. | ||||
| CVE-2018-0180 | 1 Cisco | 299 1000 Integrated Services Router, 1100-4g\/6g Integrated Services Router, 1100-4g Integrated Services Router and 296 more | 2026-01-14 | 6.8 Medium |
| Multiple vulnerabilities in the Login Enhancements (Login Block) feature of Cisco IOS Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to trigger a reload of an affected system, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. These vulnerabilities affect Cisco devices that are running Cisco IOS Software Release 15.4(2)T, 15.4(3)M, or 15.4(2)CG and later. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCuy32360, CSCuz60599. | ||||
| CVE-2018-0296 | 1 Cisco | 2 Adaptive Security Appliance Software, Firepower Threat Defense | 2026-01-14 | 7.5 High |
| A vulnerability in the web interface of the Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause an affected device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. It is also possible on certain software releases that the ASA will not reload, but an attacker could view sensitive system information without authentication by using directory traversal techniques. The vulnerability is due to lack of proper input validation of the HTTP URL. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to an affected device. An exploit could allow the attacker to cause a DoS condition or unauthenticated disclosure of information. This vulnerability applies to IPv4 and IPv6 HTTP traffic. This vulnerability affects Cisco ASA Software and Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software that is running on the following Cisco products: 3000 Series Industrial Security Appliance (ISA), ASA 1000V Cloud Firewall, ASA 5500 Series Adaptive Security Appliances, ASA 5500-X Series Next-Generation Firewalls, ASA Services Module for Cisco Catalyst 6500 Series Switches and Cisco 7600 Series Routers, Adaptive Security Virtual Appliance (ASAv), Firepower 2100 Series Security Appliance, Firepower 4100 Series Security Appliance, Firepower 9300 ASA Security Module, FTD Virtual (FTDv). Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvi16029. | ||||
| CVE-2019-0543 | 1 Microsoft | 15 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1703 and 12 more | 2026-01-14 | 7.8 High |
| An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when Windows improperly handles authentication requests, aka "Microsoft Windows Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability." This affects Windows 7, Windows Server 2012 R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows Server 2008, Windows Server 2019, Windows Server 2012, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2008 R2, Windows 10, Windows 10 Servers. | ||||
| CVE-2019-1429 | 1 Microsoft | 14 Internet Explorer, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607 and 11 more | 2026-01-14 | 7.5 High |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the scripting engine handles objects in memory in Internet Explorer, aka 'Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-1426, CVE-2019-1427, CVE-2019-1428. | ||||
| CVE-2019-4716 | 1 Ibm | 1 Planning Analytics | 2026-01-14 | 9.8 Critical |
| IBM Planning Analytics 2.0.0 through 2.0.8 is vulnerable to a configuration overwrite that allows an unauthenticated user to login as "admin", and then execute code as root or SYSTEM via TM1 scripting. IBM X-Force ID: 172094. | ||||
| CVE-2020-16010 | 1 Google | 2 Android, Chrome | 2026-01-14 | 9.6 Critical |
| Heap buffer overflow in UI in Google Chrome on Android prior to 86.0.4240.185 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. | ||||
| CVE-2020-4430 | 1 Ibm | 1 Data Risk Manager | 2026-01-14 | 4.3 Medium |
| IBM Data Risk Manager 2.0.1, 2.0.2, 2.0.3, and 2.0.4 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to traverse directories on the system. An attacker could send a specially-crafted URL request to download arbitrary files from the system. IBM X-Force ID: 180535. | ||||
| CVE-2022-26138 | 1 Atlassian | 3 Confluence Data Center, Confluence Server, Questions For Confluence | 2026-01-14 | 9.8 Critical |
| The Atlassian Questions For Confluence app for Confluence Server and Data Center creates a Confluence user account in the confluence-users group with the username disabledsystemuser and a hardcoded password. A remote, unauthenticated attacker with knowledge of the hardcoded password could exploit this to log into Confluence and access all content accessible to users in the confluence-users group. This user account is created when installing versions 2.7.34, 2.7.35, and 3.0.2 of the app. | ||||
| CVE-2022-40684 | 1 Fortinet | 3 Fortios, Fortiproxy, Fortiswitchmanager | 2026-01-14 | 9.8 Critical |
| An authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel [CWE-288] in Fortinet FortiOS version 7.2.0 through 7.2.1 and 7.0.0 through 7.0.6, FortiProxy version 7.2.0 and version 7.0.0 through 7.0.6 and FortiSwitchManager version 7.2.0 and 7.0.0 allows an unauthenticated atttacker to perform operations on the administrative interface via specially crafted HTTP or HTTPS requests. | ||||
| CVE-2022-41128 | 1 Microsoft | 24 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 21 more | 2026-01-14 | 8.8 High |
| Windows Scripting Languages Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2018-0147 | 1 Cisco | 1 Secure Access Control System | 2026-01-14 | 9.8 Critical |
| A vulnerability in Java deserialization used by Cisco Secure Access Control System (ACS) prior to release 5.8 patch 9 could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insecure deserialization of user-supplied content by the affected software. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted serialized Java object. An exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the device with root privileges. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvh25988. | ||||
| CVE-2018-0125 | 1 Cisco | 4 Rv132w, Rv132w Firmware, Rv134w and 1 more | 2026-01-14 | 9.8 Critical |
| A vulnerability in the web interface of the Cisco RV132W ADSL2+ Wireless-N VPN and RV134W VDSL2 Wireless-AC VPN Routers could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary code and gain full control of an affected system, including issuing commands with root privileges. The attacker could also cause an affected system to reload, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. The vulnerability is due to an incomplete input validation on user-controlled input in an HTTP request to the targeted device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to an affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code as the root user and gain full control of the affected system or cause it to reload, resulting in a DoS condition. This vulnerability is fixed in firmware version 1.0.1.11 for the following Cisco products: RV132W ADSL2+ Wireless-N VPN Router and RV134W VDSL2 Wireless-AC VPN Router. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvg92737, CSCvh60170. | ||||
| CVE-2025-69230 | 3 Aio-libs, Aio-libs Project, Aiohttp | 4 Aiohttp Session, Aiohttp, Aio-libs and 1 more | 2026-01-14 | 5.3 Medium |
| AIOHTTP is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. In versions 3.13.2 and below, reading multiple invalid cookies can lead to a logging storm. If the cookies attribute is accessed in an application, then an attacker may be able to trigger a storm of warning-level logs using a specially crafted Cookie header. This issue is fixed in 3.13.3. | ||||
| CVE-2025-69228 | 3 Aio-libs, Aio-libs Project, Aiohttp | 4 Aiohttp Session, Aiohttp, Aio-libs and 1 more | 2026-01-14 | 7.5 High |
| AIOHTTP is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Versions 3.13.2 and below allow a request to be crafted in such a way that an AIOHTTP server's memory fills up uncontrollably during processing. If an application includes a handler that uses the Request.post() method, an attacker may be able to freeze the server by exhausting the memory. This issue is fixed in version 3.13.3. | ||||
| CVE-2025-69227 | 3 Aio-libs, Aio-libs Project, Aiohttp | 4 Aiohttp Session, Aiohttp, Aio-libs and 1 more | 2026-01-14 | 7.5 High |
| AIOHTTP is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Versions 3.13.2 and below allow for an infinite loop to occur when assert statements are bypassed, resulting in a DoS attack when processing a POST body. If optimizations are enabled (-O or PYTHONOPTIMIZE=1), and the application includes a handler that uses the Request.post() method, then an attacker may be able to execute a DoS attack with a specially crafted message. This issue is fixed in version 3.13.3. | ||||