Export limit exceeded: 366571 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (366571 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-52941 | 1 Veritas | 1 Enterprise Vault | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Veritas Enterprise Vault before 15.1 UPD882911, ZDI-CAN-24695. It allows an authenticated remote attacker to inject a parameter into an HTTP request, allowing for Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) while viewing archived content. This could reflect back to an authenticated user without sanitization if executed by that user. | ||||
| CVE-2024-52946 | 1 Lemonldap-ng | 1 Lemonldap-ng | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| An issue was discovered in LemonLDAP::NG before 2.20.1. An Improper Check during session refresh allows an authenticated user to raise their authentication level if the admin configured an "Adaptative authentication rule" with an increment instead of an absolute value. | ||||
| CVE-2024-52947 | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium | ||
| A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in LemonLDAP::NG before 2.20.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the url parameter of the upgrade session confirmation page (upgradeSession / forceUpgrade) if the "Upgrade session" plugin has been enabled by an admin | ||||
| CVE-2024-52951 | 1 Omada | 1 Omada Identity | 2026-04-15 | 8 High |
| Stored Cross-Site Scripting in the Access Request History in Omada Identity before version 15 update 1 allows an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code in the browser of a victim via a specially crafted link or by viewing a manipulated Access Request History | ||||
| CVE-2024-52975 | 1 Elastic | 1 Fleet Server | 2026-04-15 | 9 Critical |
| An issue was identified in Fleet Server where Fleet policies that could contain sensitive information were logged on INFO and ERROR log levels. The nature of the sensitive information largely depends on the integrations enabled. | ||||
| CVE-2024-54728 | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| Incorrect access control in BYD QIN PLUS DM-i Dilink OS 3.0_13.1.7.2204050.1 allows unauthorized attackers to access system logcat logs. | ||||
| CVE-2024-53007 | 2026-04-15 | 6.4 Medium | ||
| Bentley Systems ProjectWise Integration Server before 10.00.03.288 allows unintended SQL query execution by an authenticated user via an API call. | ||||
| CVE-2024-53008 | 1 Haproxy | 1 Haproxy | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| Inconsistent interpretation of HTTP requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') issue exists in HAProxy. If this vulnerability is exploited, a remote attacker may access a path that is restricted by ACL (Access Control List) set on the product. As a result, the attacker may obtain sensitive information. | ||||
| CVE-2024-5311 | 1 Digiwin | 1 Easyflow .net | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| DigiWin EasyFlow .NET lacks validation for certain input parameters. An unauthenticated remote attacker can inject arbitrary SQL commands to read, modify, and delete database records. | ||||
| CVE-2024-5312 | 2026-04-15 | 6.3 Medium | ||
| PHP Server Monitor, version 3.2.0, is vulnerable to an XSS via the /phpservermon-3.2.0/vendor/phpmailer/phpmailer/test_script/index.php page in all visible parameters. An attacker could create a specially crafted URL, send it to a victim and retrieve their session details. | ||||
| CVE-2024-5321 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openshift | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium |
| A security issue was discovered in Kubernetes clusters with Windows nodes where BUILTIN\Users may be able to read container logs and NT AUTHORITY\Authenticated Users may be able to modify container logs. | ||||
| CVE-2024-53247 | 1 Splunk | 2 Splunk Enterprise, Splunk Secure Gateway | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 9.3.2, 9.2.4, and 9.1.7, and versions below 3.4.261 and 3.7.13 of the Splunk Secure Gateway app on Splunk Cloud Platform, a low-privileged user that does not hold the “admin“ or “power“ Splunk roles could perform a Remote Code Execution (RCE). | ||||
| CVE-2024-53256 | 2026-04-15 | 7.8 High | ||
| Rizin is a UNIX-like reverse engineering framework and command-line toolset. `rizin.c` still had an old snippet of code which suffered a command injection due the usage of `rz_core_cmdf` to invoke the command `m` which was removed in v0.1.x. A malicious binary defining `bclass` (part of RzBinInfo) is executed if `rclass` (part of RzBinInfo) is set to `fs`; the vulnerability can be exploited by any bin format where `bclass` and `rclass` are user defined. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.7.4. | ||||
| CVE-2024-53257 | 1 Vitessio | 1 Vitess | 2026-04-15 | 4.9 Medium |
| Vitess is a database clustering system for horizontal scaling of MySQL. The /debug/querylogz and /debug/env pages for vtgate and vttablet do not properly escape user input. The result is that queries executed by Vitess can write HTML into the monitoring page at will. These pages are rendered using text/template instead of rendering with a proper HTML templating engine. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.1, 20.0.4, and 19.0.8. | ||||
| CVE-2024-53259 | 1 Redhat | 2 Acm, Ansible Automation Platform | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| quic-go is an implementation of the QUIC protocol in Go. An off-path attacker can inject an ICMP Packet Too Large packet. Since affected quic-go versions used IP_PMTUDISC_DO, the kernel would then return a "message too large" error on sendmsg, i.e. when quic-go attempts to send a packet that exceeds the MTU claimed in that ICMP packet. By setting this value to smaller than 1200 bytes (the minimum MTU for QUIC), the attacker can disrupt a QUIC connection. Crucially, this can be done after completion of the handshake, thereby circumventing any TCP fallback that might be implemented on the application layer (for example, many browsers fall back to HTTP over TCP if they're unable to establish a QUIC connection). The attacker needs to at least know the client's IP and port tuple to mount an attack. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.48.2. | ||||
| CVE-2024-5326 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| The Post Grid Gutenberg Blocks and WordPress Blog Plugin – PostX plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'postx_presets_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 4.1.2. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to change arbitrary options on affected sites. This can be used to enable new user registration and set the default role for new users to Administrator. | ||||
| CVE-2024-53263 | 1 Redhat | 5 Enterprise Linux, Rhel Aus, Rhel E4s and 2 more | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High |
| Git LFS is a Git extension for versioning large files. When Git LFS requests credentials from Git for a remote host, it passes portions of the host's URL to the `git-credential(1)` command without checking for embedded line-ending control characters, and then sends any credentials it receives back from the Git credential helper to the remote host. By inserting URL-encoded control characters such as line feed (LF) or carriage return (CR) characters into the URL, an attacker may be able to retrieve a user's Git credentials. This problem exists in all previous versions and is patched in v3.6.1. All users should upgrade to v3.6.1. There are no workarounds known at this time. | ||||
| CVE-2024-53264 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| bunkerweb is an Open-source and next-generation Web Application Firewall (WAF). A open redirect vulnerability exists in the loading endpoint, allowing attackers to redirect authenticated users to arbitrary external URLs via the "next" parameter. The loading endpoint accepts and uses an unvalidated "next" parameter for redirects. Ex. visiting: `/loading?next=https://google.com` while authenticated will cause the page will redirect to google.com. This vulnerability could be used in phishing attacks by redirecting users from a legitimate application URL to malicious sites. This issue has been addressed in version 1.5.11. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2024-53267 | 1 Sigstore | 1 Sigstore-java | 2026-04-15 | 5.5 Medium |
| sigstore-java is a sigstore java client for interacting with sigstore infrastructure. sigstore-java has insufficient verification for a situation where a validly-signed but "mismatched" bundle is presented as proof of inclusion into a transparency log. This bug impacts clients using any variation of KeylessVerifier.verify(). The verifier may accept a bundle with an unrelated log entry, cryptographically verifying everything but fails to ensure the log entry applies to the artifact in question, thereby "verifying" a bundle without any proof the signing event was logged. This allows the creation of a bundle without fulcio certificate and private key combined with an unrelated but time-correct log entry to fake logging of a signing event. A malicious actor using a compromised identity may want to do this to prevent discovery via rekor's log monitors. The signer's identity will still be available to the verifier. The signature on the bundle must still be on the correct artifact for the verifier to pass. sigstore-gradle-plugin and sigstore-maven-plugin are not affected by this as they only provide signing functionality. This issue has been patched in v1.1.0 release with PR #856. All users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2024-53275 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Home-Gallery.org is a self-hosted open-source web gallery to browse personal photos and videos. In 1.15.0 and earlier, the default setup of home-gallery is vulnerable to DNS rebinding. Home-gallery is set up without TLS and user authentication by default, leaving it vulnerable to DNS rebinding. In this attack, an attacker will ask a user to visit their website. The attacker website will then change the DNS records of their domain from their IP address to the internal IP address of the home-gallery instance. To tell which IP addresses are valid, we can rebind a subdomain to each IP address we want to check, and see if there is a response. Once potential candidates have been found, the attacker can launch the attack by reading the response of the web server after the IP address has changed. When the attacker domain is fetched, the response will be from the home-gallery instance, not the attacker website, because the IP address has been changed. Due to a lack of authentication, home-gallery photos can then be extracted by the attacker website. | ||||