{"dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "dataVersion": "5.2", "cveMetadata": {"cveId": "CVE-2026-47734", "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa", "state": "PUBLISHED", "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M", "dateReserved": "2026-05-19T22:16:39.503Z", "datePublished": "2026-06-10T22:11:02.704Z", "dateUpdated": "2026-06-11T16:14:16.785Z"}, "containers": {"cna": {"title": "Dulwich has unbounded memory allocation in receive-pack from crafted thin packs", "problemTypes": [{"descriptions": [{"cweId": "CWE-400", "lang": "en", "description": "CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption", "type": "CWE"}]}, {"descriptions": [{"cweId": "CWE-789", "lang": "en", "description": "CWE-789: Memory Allocation with Excessive Size Value", "type": "CWE"}]}], "metrics": [{"cvssV3_1": {"attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 5.7, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "version": "3.1"}}], "references": [{"name": "https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/security/advisories/GHSA-xrvj-v92f-53gj", "tags": ["x_refsource_CONFIRM"], "url": "https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/security/advisories/GHSA-xrvj-v92f-53gj"}, {"name": "https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/releases/tag/dulwich-1.2.5", "tags": ["x_refsource_MISC"], "url": "https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/releases/tag/dulwich-1.2.5"}], "affected": [{"vendor": "jelmer", "product": "dulwich", "versions": [{"version": ">= 0.1.0, < 1.2.5", "status": "affected"}]}], "providerMetadata": {"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa", "shortName": "GitHub_M", "dateUpdated": "2026-06-10T22:11:02.704Z"}, "descriptions": [{"lang": "en", "value": "Dulwich is a pure-Python implementation of the Git file formats and protocols. Starting in version 0.1.0 and prior to version 1.2.5, a client with push access could push a tiny crafted thin pack (~174 bytes) whose delta header declares a huge dest_size. When dulwich ingested it via add_thin_pack / apply_delta, it would allocate hundreds of MB of memory based on that attacker-controlled size, with no relationship to the actual bytes received. Operators running a Dulwich-based Git server that exposes git-receive-pack (i.e. accepts pushes) - for example via dulwich.server functionality, the HTTP smart server, or anything built on ReceivePackHandler - are impacted. The issue is patched in 1.2.5. add_thin_pack now accepts a max_input_size keyword (bytes; 0/None = unlimited, matching git's semantics), and ReceivePackHandler reads receive.maxInputSize from the repository config and passes it through. Wire reads are counted and a PackInputTooLarge exception is raised once the cap is exceeded - equivalent to git index-pack --max-input-size. Users should upgrade to Dulwich 1.2.5 or later and set receive.maxInputSize in their server's repository config to a sane bound for their environment. On unpatched versions, receive.maxInputSize has no effect, so it cannot be used as a workaround. Until upgrading, operators should restrict dulwich-receive-pack (push) access to trusted, authenticated clients only, or disable it entirely on servers that only need to serve fetches and/or run the server under an OS-level memory limit (e.g. ulimit, cgroups/MemoryMax, or a container memory limit) so a malicious push is killed rather than taking down the host."}], "source": {"advisory": "GHSA-xrvj-v92f-53gj", "discovery": "UNKNOWN"}}, "adp": [{"metrics": [{"other": {"type": "ssvc", "content": {"timestamp": "2026-06-11T14:08:10.796596Z", "id": "CVE-2026-47734", "options": [{"Exploitation": "none"}, {"Automatable": "no"}, {"Technical Impact": "partial"}], "role": "CISA Coordinator", "version": "2.0.3"}}}], "title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment", "providerMetadata": {"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "shortName": "CISA-ADP", "dateUpdated": "2026-06-11T16:14:16.785Z"}}]}}

{"dataType": "CVE_RECORD", "containers": {"adp": [{"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment", "metrics": [{"other": {"type": "ssvc", "content": {"id": "CVE-2026-47734", "role": "CISA Coordinator", "options": [{"Exploitation": "none"}, {"Automatable": "no"}, {"Technical Impact": "partial"}], "version": "2.0.3", "timestamp": "2026-06-11T14:08:10.796596Z"}}}], "providerMetadata": {"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0", "shortName": "CISA-ADP", "dateUpdated": "2026-06-11T14:40:15.611Z"}}], "cna": {"title": "Dulwich has unbounded memory allocation in receive-pack from crafted thin packs", "source": {"advisory": "GHSA-xrvj-v92f-53gj", "discovery": "UNKNOWN"}, "metrics": [{"cvssV3_1": {"scope": "UNCHANGED", "version": "3.1", "baseScore": 5.7, "attackVector": "NETWORK", "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "LOW", "confidentialityImpact": "NONE"}}], "affected": [{"vendor": "jelmer", "product": "dulwich", "versions": [{"status": "affected", "version": ">= 0.1.0, < 1.2.5"}]}], "references": [{"url": "https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/security/advisories/GHSA-xrvj-v92f-53gj", "name": "https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/security/advisories/GHSA-xrvj-v92f-53gj", "tags": ["x_refsource_CONFIRM"]}, {"url": "https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/releases/tag/dulwich-1.2.5", "name": "https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/releases/tag/dulwich-1.2.5", "tags": ["x_refsource_MISC"]}], "descriptions": [{"lang": "en", "value": "Dulwich is a pure-Python implementation of the Git file formats and protocols. Starting in version 0.1.0 and prior to version 1.2.5, a client with push access could push a tiny crafted thin pack (~174 bytes) whose delta header declares a huge dest_size. When dulwich ingested it via add_thin_pack / apply_delta, it would allocate hundreds of MB of memory based on that attacker-controlled size, with no relationship to the actual bytes received. Operators running a Dulwich-based Git server that exposes git-receive-pack (i.e. accepts pushes) - for example via dulwich.server functionality, the HTTP smart server, or anything built on ReceivePackHandler - are impacted. The issue is patched in 1.2.5. add_thin_pack now accepts a max_input_size keyword (bytes; 0/None = unlimited, matching git's semantics), and ReceivePackHandler reads receive.maxInputSize from the repository config and passes it through. Wire reads are counted and a PackInputTooLarge exception is raised once the cap is exceeded - equivalent to git index-pack --max-input-size. Users should upgrade to Dulwich 1.2.5 or later and set receive.maxInputSize in their server's repository config to a sane bound for their environment. On unpatched versions, receive.maxInputSize has no effect, so it cannot be used as a workaround. Until upgrading, operators should restrict dulwich-receive-pack (push) access to trusted, authenticated clients only, or disable it entirely on servers that only need to serve fetches and/or run the server under an OS-level memory limit (e.g. ulimit, cgroups/MemoryMax, or a container memory limit) so a malicious push is killed rather than taking down the host."}], "problemTypes": [{"descriptions": [{"lang": "en", "type": "CWE", "cweId": "CWE-400", "description": "CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption"}]}, {"descriptions": [{"lang": "en", "type": "CWE", "cweId": "CWE-789", "description": "CWE-789: Memory Allocation with Excessive Size Value"}]}], "providerMetadata": {"orgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa", "shortName": "GitHub_M", "dateUpdated": "2026-06-10T22:11:02.704Z"}}}, "cveMetadata": {"cveId": "CVE-2026-47734", "state": "PUBLISHED", "dateUpdated": "2026-06-11T16:14:16.785Z", "dateReserved": "2026-05-19T22:16:39.503Z", "assignerOrgId": "a0819718-46f1-4df5-94e2-005712e83aaa", "datePublished": "2026-06-10T22:11:02.704Z", "assignerShortName": "GitHub_M"}, "dataVersion": "5.2"}

{"cveTags": [], "descriptions": [{"lang": "en", "value": "Dulwich is a pure-Python implementation of the Git file formats and protocols. Starting in version 0.1.0 and prior to version 1.2.5, a client with push access could push a tiny crafted thin pack (~174 bytes) whose delta header declares a huge dest_size. When dulwich ingested it via add_thin_pack / apply_delta, it would allocate hundreds of MB of memory based on that attacker-controlled size, with no relationship to the actual bytes received. Operators running a Dulwich-based Git server that exposes git-receive-pack (i.e. accepts pushes) - for example via dulwich.server functionality, the HTTP smart server, or anything built on ReceivePackHandler - are impacted. The issue is patched in 1.2.5. add_thin_pack now accepts a max_input_size keyword (bytes; 0/None = unlimited, matching git's semantics), and ReceivePackHandler reads receive.maxInputSize from the repository config and passes it through. Wire reads are counted and a PackInputTooLarge exception is raised once the cap is exceeded - equivalent to git index-pack --max-input-size. Users should upgrade to Dulwich 1.2.5 or later and set receive.maxInputSize in their server's repository config to a sane bound for their environment. On unpatched versions, receive.maxInputSize has no effect, so it cannot be used as a workaround. Until upgrading, operators should restrict dulwich-receive-pack (push) access to trusted, authenticated clients only, or disable it entirely on servers that only need to serve fetches and/or run the server under an OS-level memory limit (e.g. ulimit, cgroups/MemoryMax, or a container memory limit) so a malicious push is killed rather than taking down the host."}], "id": "CVE-2026-47734", "lastModified": "2026-06-11T15:21:07.370", "metrics": {"cvssMetricV31": [{"cvssData": {"attackComplexity": "LOW", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 5.7, "baseSeverity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "NONE", "integrityImpact": "NONE", "privilegesRequired": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "version": "3.1"}, "exploitabilityScore": 2.1, "impactScore": 3.6, "source": "security-advisories@github.com", "type": "Secondary"}]}, "published": "2026-06-10T23:16:48.807", "references": [{"source": "security-advisories@github.com", "url": "https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/releases/tag/dulwich-1.2.5"}, {"source": "security-advisories@github.com", "url": "https://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/security/advisories/GHSA-xrvj-v92f-53gj"}], "sourceIdentifier": "security-advisories@github.com", "vulnStatus": "Deferred", "weaknesses": [{"description": [{"lang": "en", "value": "CWE-400"}, {"lang": "en", "value": "CWE-789"}], "source": "security-advisories@github.com", "type": "Primary"}]}

{"bugzilla": {"description": "dulwich: Dulwich: Denial of Service via crafted Git thin pack", "id": "2487774", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2487774"}, "csaw": false, "cvss3": {"cvss3_base_score": "6.5", "cvss3_scoring_vector": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "status": "draft"}, "cwe": "CWE-1285", "details": ["A flaw was found in Dulwich, a pure-Python implementation of Git file formats and protocols. A remote attacker with push access to a Dulwich-based Git server could send a specially crafted thin pack. This crafted pack, with a manipulated delta header, would cause the server to allocate excessive amounts of memory, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) condition. This vulnerability allows an authenticated attacker to disrupt the availability of the Git server."], "name": "CVE-2026-47734", "package_state": [{"cpe": "cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2", "fix_state": "Fix deferred", "package_name": "ansible-automation-platform-26/controller-rhel9", "product_name": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2"}, {"cpe": "cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2", "fix_state": "Fix deferred", "package_name": "ansible-automation-platform-26/eda-controller-rhel9", "product_name": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2"}, {"cpe": "cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2", "fix_state": "Fix deferred", "package_name": "ansible-automation-platform-26/lightspeed-chatbot-rhel9", "product_name": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2"}, {"cpe": "cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2", "fix_state": "Fix deferred", "package_name": "ansible-automation-platform-27/controller-rhel9", "product_name": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2"}, {"cpe": "cpe:/a:redhat:ansible_automation_platform:2", "fix_state": "Fix deferred", "package_name": "ansible-automation-platform-27/eda-controller-rhel9", "product_name": "Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2"}, {"cpe": "cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:7", "fix_state": "Fix deferred", "package_name": "resource-agents", "product_name": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7"}, {"cpe": "cpe:/o:redhat:enterprise_linux:8", "fix_state": "Fix deferred", "package_name": "resource-agents", "product_name": "Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8"}, {"cpe": "cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai", "fix_state": "Under investigation", "package_name": "rhoai/odh-kserve-agent-rhel9", "product_name": "Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)"}, {"cpe": "cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai", "fix_state": "Under investigation", "package_name": "rhoai/odh-kserve-autogluon-server-rhel9", "product_name": "Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)"}, {"cpe": "cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai", "fix_state": "Under investigation", "package_name": "rhoai/odh-kserve-controller-rhel9", "product_name": "Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)"}, {"cpe": "cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai", "fix_state": "Under investigation", "package_name": "rhoai/odh-kserve-router-rhel9", "product_name": "Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)"}, {"cpe": "cpe:/a:redhat:openshift_ai", "fix_state": "Under investigation", "package_name": "rhoai/odh-kserve-storage-initializer-rhel9", "product_name": "Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)"}, {"cpe": "cpe:/a:redhat:openshift:4", "fix_state": "Under investigation", "package_name": "python-dulwich", "product_name": "Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4"}, {"cpe": "cpe:/a:redhat:satellite:6", "fix_state": "Fix deferred", "package_name": "python-dulwich", "product_name": "Red Hat Satellite 6"}], "public_date": "2026-06-10T22:11:02Z", "references": ["https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-47734\nhttps://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-47734\nhttps://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/releases/tag/dulwich-1.2.5\nhttps://github.com/jelmer/dulwich/security/advisories/GHSA-xrvj-v92f-53gj"], "statement": "This Moderate impact denial of service flaw in Dulwich affects Red Hat products utilizing Dulwich-based Git server functionalities. An authenticated attacker with push access could send a crafted Git thin pack, causing excessive memory allocation and disrupting service availability. The vulnerability requires prior authentication, but its exploitation can lead to a system crash.", "threat_severity": "Moderate"}

{"affected": [{"configurations": [{"platform": null, "status": "affected", "versions": {"scheme": "semver", "value": "[0.1.0,1.2.5)"}}], "enrichment": {"confidence": 100.0, "confidence_source": "cna", "scores": [{"score": 100.0, "source": "cna"}]}, "original": {"product": "dulwich", "source": "cna", "vendor": "jelmer"}, "product": "dulwich", "vendor": "jelmer"}], "created": "2026-06-10T23:30:44.129518+00:00", "updated": "2026-06-12T02:00:12.785419+00:00", "vendors": ["jelmer", "jelmer$PRODUCT$dulwich"]}