Export limit exceeded: 404138 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (4374 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-36611 | 1 Symfony | 1 Symfony | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| In Symfony v7.07, a security vulnerability was identified in the FormLoginAuthenticator component, where it failed to adequately handle cases where the username or password field of a login request is empty. This flaw could lead to various security risks, including improper authentication logic handling or denial of service. NOTE: the Supplier has concluded that this is a false report. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13947 | 1 Abb | 3 Aspect Enterprise, Matrix Series, Nexus Series | 2026-04-15 | 6 Medium |
| Device commissioning parameters in ASPECT may be modified by an external source if administrative credentials become compromisedThis issue affects ASPECT-Enterprise: through 3.*; NEXUS Series: through 3.*; MATRIX Series: through 3.*. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7915 | 1 Sensei | 1 Sensei Mac Cleaner | 2026-04-15 | 7.8 High |
| The application Sensei Mac Cleaner contains a local privilege escalation vulnerability, allowing an attacker to perform multiple operations as the root user. These operations include arbitrary file deletion and writing, loading and unloading daemons, manipulating file permissions, and loading extensions, among other actions. The vulnerable module org.cindori.SenseiHelper can be contacted via XPC. While the module performs client validation, it relies on the client's PID obtained through the public processIdentifier property of the NSXPCConnection class. This approach makes the module susceptible to a PID Reuse Attack, enabling an attacker to impersonate a legitimate client and send crafted XPC messages to invoke arbitrary methods exposed by the HelperProtocol interface. | ||||
| CVE-2025-43917 | 1 Pritunl | 1 Pritunl-client | 2026-04-15 | 8.2 High |
| In Pritunl Client before 1.3.4220.57, an administrator with access to /Applications can escalate privileges after uninstalling the product. Specifically, an administrator can insert a new file at the pathname of the removed pritunl-service file. This file then is executed by a LaunchDaemon as root. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27512 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Zincati is an auto-update agent for Fedora CoreOS hosts. Zincati ships a polkit rule which allows the `zincati` system user to use the actions `org.projectatomic.rpmostree1.deploy` to deploy updates to the system and `org.projectatomic.rpmostree1.finalize-deployment` to reboot the system into the deployed update. Since Zincati v0.0.24, this polkit rule contains a logic error which broadens access of those polkit actions to any unprivileged user rather than just the `zincati` system user. In practice, this means that any unprivileged user with access to the system D-Bus socket is able to deploy older Fedora CoreOS versions (which may have other known vulnerabilities). Note that rpm-ostree enforces that the selected version must be from the same branch the system is currently on so this cannot directly be used to deploy an attacker-controlled update payload. This primarily impacts users running untrusted workloads with access to the system D-Bus socket. Note that in general, untrusted workloads should not be given this access, whether containerized or not. By default, containers do not have access to the system D-Bus socket. The logic error is fixed in Zincati v0.0.30. A workaround is to manually add a following polkit rule, instructions for which are available in the GitHub Security Advisory. | ||||
| CVE-2025-11862 | 1 Rockwellautomation | 1 Verve Asset Manager | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A security issue was discovered within Verve Asset Manager allowing unauthorized read-only users to read, update, and delete users via the API. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7457 | 2 Apple, Stash | 2 Macos, Stash | 2026-04-15 | 7.8 High |
| The ws.stash.app.mac.daemon.helper tool contains a vulnerability caused by an incorrect use of macOS’s authorization model. Instead of validating the client's authorization reference, the helper invokes AuthorizationCopyRights() using its own privileged context (root), effectively authorizing itself rather than the client. As a result, it grants the system.preferences.admin right internally, regardless of the requesting client's privileges. This flawed logic allows unprivileged clients to invoke privileged operations via XPC, including unauthorized changes to system-wide network preferences such as SOCKS, HTTP, and HTTPS proxy settings. The absence of proper code-signing checks further enables arbitrary processes to exploit this flaw, leading to man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks through traffic redirection. | ||||
| CVE-2024-48544 | 1 Ledvance | 1 Sylvania Smart Home Firmware | 2026-04-15 | 8.4 High |
| Incorrect access control in the firmware update and download processes of Sylvania Smart Home v3.0.3 allows attackers to access sensitive information by analyzing the code and data within the APK file. | ||||
| CVE-2025-31331 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| SAP NetWeaver allows an attacker to bypass authorization checks, enabling them to view portions of ABAP code that would normally require additional validation. Once logged into the ABAP system, the attacker can run a specific transaction that exposes sensitive system code without proper authorization. This vulnerability compromises the confidentiality. | ||||
| CVE-2025-52918 | 2026-04-15 | 5 Medium | ||
| Yealink RPS before 2025-05-26 does not prevent OpenAPI access by frozen enterprise accounts, allowing unauthorized access to deactivated interfaces. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11176 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Improper access control vulnerability in M-Files Aino in versions before 24.10 allowed an authenticated user to access object information via incorrect evaluation of effective permissions. | ||||
| CVE-2024-51426 | 1 Ethereum | 1 Ethereum | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| An issue in the PepeGxng smart contract (which can be run on the Ethereum blockchain) allows remote attackers to have an unspecified impact via the _transfer function. NOTE: this is disputed by third parties because the impact is limited to function calls. | ||||
| CVE-2024-37300 | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High | ||
| OAuthenticator is software that allows OAuth2 identity providers to be plugged in and used with JupyterHub. JupyterHub < 5.0, when used with `GlobusOAuthenticator`, could be configured to allow all users from a particular institution only. This worked fine prior to JupyterHub 5.0, because `allow_all` did not take precedence over `identity_provider`. Since JupyterHub 5.0, `allow_all` does take precedence over `identity_provider`. On a hub with the same config, now all users will be allowed to login, regardless of `identity_provider`. `identity_provider` will basically be ignored. This is a documented change in JupyterHub 5.0, but is likely to catch many users by surprise. OAuthenticator 16.3.1 fixes the issue with JupyterHub 5.0, and does not affect previous versions. As a workaround, do not upgrade to JupyterHub 5.0 when using `GlobusOAuthenticator` in the prior configuration. | ||||
| CVE-2025-7773 | 1 Rockwellautomation | 1 Armorblock 5000 Io | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A security issue exists within the 5032 16pt Digital Configurable module’s web server. The web server’s session number increments at an interval that correlates to the last two consecutive sign in session interval, making it predictable. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8533 | 1 Flexibits | 1 Fantastical | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A vulnerability was identified in the XPC services of Fantastical. The services failed to implement proper client authorization checks in its listener:shouldAcceptNewConnection method, unconditionally accepting requests from any local process. As a result, any local, unprivileged process could connect to the XPC service and access its methods. This issue has been resolved in version 4.0.16. | ||||
| CVE-2024-2378 | 2026-04-15 | 8 High | ||
| A vulnerability exists in the web-authentication component of the SDM600. If exploited an attacker could escalate privileges on af-fected installations. | ||||
| CVE-2024-51425 | 1 Ethereum | 1 Ethereum | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| An issue in the WaterToken smart contract (which can be run on the Ethereum blockchain) allows remote attackers to have an unspecified impact. NOTE: this is disputed by third parties because the impact is limited to function calls. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14986 | 1 Temporal | 1 Temporal | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| When frontend.enableExecuteMultiOperation is enabled, the server can apply namespace-scoped validation and feature gates for the embedded StartWorkflowExecutionRequest using its Namespace field rather than the outer, authorized ExecuteMultiOperationRequest.Namespace. This allows a caller authorized for one namespace to bypass that namespace's limits/policies by setting the embedded start request's namespace to a different namespace. The workflow is still created in the outer (authorized) namespace; only validation/gating is performed under the wrong namespace context. This issue affects Temporal: from 1.24.0 through 1.29.1. Fixed in 1.27.4, 1.28.2, 1.29.2. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3260 | 1 Grafana | 1 Grafana | 2026-04-15 | 8.3 High |
| A security vulnerability in the /apis/dashboard.grafana.app/* endpoints allows authenticated users to bypass dashboard and folder permissions. The vulnerability affects all API versions (v0alpha1, v1alpha1, v2alpha1). Impact: - Viewers can view all dashboards/folders regardless of permissions - Editors can view/edit/delete all dashboards/folders regardless of permissions - Editors can create dashboards in any folder regardless of permissions - Anonymous users with viewer/editor roles are similarly affected Organization isolation boundaries remain intact. The vulnerability only affects dashboard access and does not grant access to datasources. | ||||
| CVE-2024-39328 | 2026-04-15 | 6.8 Medium | ||
| Insecure Permissions in Atos Eviden IDRA and IDCA before 2.7.0. A highly trusted role (Config Admin) could exceed their configuration privileges in a multi-partition environment and access some confidential data. Data integrity and availability is not at risk. | ||||