Export limit exceeded: 372898 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (372898 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-8631 | 1 Microsoft | 6 Excel, Excel Viewer, Excel Web App and 3 more | 2025-04-20 | 7.8 High |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Excel Services, Microsoft Excel 2007 Service Pack 3, Microsoft Excel 2010 Service Pack 2, Microsoft Excel 2013 Service Pack 1, Microsoft Excel 2013 RT Service Pack 1, Microsoft Excel 2016, Microsoft Office Web Apps 2013, Microsoft Office Compatibility Pack Service Pack 3, Microsoft Excel Web App 2013 Service Pack 1, Microsoft Excel Viewer 2007 Service Pack 3, and Office Online Server when they fail to properly handle objects in memory, aka "Microsoft Office Memory Corruption Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-8630, CVE-2017-8632, and CVE-2017-8744. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8632 | 1 Microsoft | 4 Excel, Excel For Mac, Office Compatibility Pack and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Microsoft Excel 2010 Service Pack 2, Microsoft Excel 2013 Service Pack 1, Microsoft Excel 2013 RT Service Pack 1, Microsoft Excel 2016, Microsoft Office Web Apps 2013, Microsoft Excel for Mac 2011, Microsoft Excel 2016 for Mac, and Microsoft Office Compatibility Pack Service Pack 3, when they fail to properly handle objects in memory, aka "Microsoft Office Memory Corruption Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-8630, CVE-2017-8631, and CVE-2017-8744. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8683 | 1 Microsoft | 6 Windows 10, Windows 7, Windows 8.1 and 3 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Windows graphics on Microsoft Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, and 1703, and Windows Server 2016, allows an attacker to execute remote code by the way it handles embedded fonts, aka "Win32k Graphics Remote Code Execution Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-8682. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8699 | 1 Microsoft | 7 Windows 10, Windows 7, Windows 8.1 and 4 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Windows Shell in Microsoft Windows 7 SP1, Windows Server 2008 and R2 SP1, Windows 8.1 and Windows RT 8.1, Windows Server 2012 and R2, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, 1703, and Windows Server 2016 allows an attacker to run arbitrary code in the context of the current user, due to the way that Windows Shell validates file copy destinations, aka "Windows Shell Remote Code Execution Vulnerability". | ||||
| CVE-2017-8714 | 1 Microsoft | 4 Windows 10, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The Windows Hyper-V component on Microsoft Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2,, Windows 10 1607, and Windows Server 2016 allows a remote code execution vulnerability when it fails to properly validate input from an authenticated user on a guest operating system, aka "Remote Desktop Virtual Host Remote Code Execution Vulnerability". | ||||
| CVE-2017-8725 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Publisher | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Microsoft Publisher 2007 Service Pack 3 and Microsoft Publisher 2010 Service Pack 2 when they fail to properly handle objects in memory, aka "Microsoft Office Publisher Remote Code Execution". | ||||
| CVE-2017-8742 | 1 Microsoft | 7 Office Compatibility Pack, Office Web Apps, Office Web Apps Server and 4 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Microsoft PowerPoint 2007 Service Pack 3, Microsoft PowerPoint 2010 Service Pack 2, Microsoft PowerPoint 2013 Service Pack 1, Microsoft PowerPoint 2013 RT Service Pack 1, Microsoft PowerPoint 2016, Microsoft PowerPoint Viewer 2007, Microsoft SharePoint Server 2013 Service Pack 1, Microsoft SharePoint Enterprise Server 2016, Microsoft Office Web Apps 2010 Service Pack 2, and Microsoft Office Compatibility Pack Service Pack 3 when they fail to properly handle objects in memory, aka "PowerPoint Remote Code Execution Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-8743. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8744 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Office | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Excel Services, Microsoft Excel 2007 Service Pack 3, Microsoft Excel 2010 Service Pack 2, Microsoft Excel 2013 Service Pack 1, Microsoft Excel 2013 RT Service Pack 1, and Microsoft Excel 2016 when they fail to properly handle objects in memory, aka "Microsoft Office Memory Corruption Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-8630, CVE-2017-8632, and CVE-2017-8731. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8907 | 1 Atlassian | 1 Bamboo | 2025-04-20 | 8.8 High |
| Atlassian Bamboo 5.x before 5.15.7 and 6.x before 6.0.1 did not correctly check if a user creating a deployment project had the edit permission and therefore the rights to do so. An attacker who can login to Bamboo as a user without the edit permission for deployment projects is able to use this vulnerability, provided there is an existing plan with a green build, to create a deployment project and execute arbitrary code on an available Bamboo Agent. By default a local agent is enabled; this means that code execution can occur on the system hosting Bamboo as the user running Bamboo. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5518 | 1 Metalgenix | 1 Genixcms | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The media-file upload feature in GeniXCMS through 0.0.8 allows remote attackers to conduct SSRF attacks via a URL, as demonstrated by a URL with an intranet IP address. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5519 | 1 Metalgenix | 1 Genixcms | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| SQL injection vulnerability in Posts.class.php in GeniXCMS through 0.0.8 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the id parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2013-7453 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The validator module before 1.1.0 for Node.js allows remote attackers to bypass the cross-site scripting (XSS) filter via vectors related to UI redressing. | ||||
| CVE-2016-7036 | 1 Python-jose Project | 1 Python-jose | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| python-jose before 1.3.2 allows attackers to have unspecified impact by leveraging failure to use a constant time comparison for HMAC keys. | ||||
| CVE-2017-14108 | 1 Gnome | 1 Gedit | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| libgedit.a in GNOME gedit through 3.22.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via a file that begins with many '\0' characters. | ||||
| CVE-2017-14595 | 1 Joomla | 1 Joomla\! | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In Joomla! before 3.8.0, a logic bug in a SQL query could lead to the disclosure of article intro texts when these articles are in the archived state. | ||||
| CVE-2017-16633 | 1 Joomla | 1 Joomla\! | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In Joomla! before 3.8.2, a logic bug in com_fields exposed read-only information about a site's custom fields to unauthorized users. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5711 | 3 Asus, Intel, Siemens | 394 B150-a, B150-a Firmware, B150-plus and 391 more | 2025-04-20 | 7.8 High |
| Multiple buffer overflows in Active Management Technology (AMT) in Intel Manageability Engine Firmware 8.x/9.x/10.x/11.0/11.5/11.6/11.7/11.10/11.20 allow attacker with local access to the system to execute arbitrary code with AMT execution privilege. | ||||
| CVE-2017-9445 | 1 Systemd Project | 1 Systemd | 2025-04-20 | 7.5 High |
| In systemd through 233, certain sizes passed to dns_packet_new in systemd-resolved can cause it to allocate a buffer that's too small. A malicious DNS server can exploit this via a response with a specially crafted TCP payload to trick systemd-resolved into allocating a buffer that's too small, and subsequently write arbitrary data beyond the end of it. | ||||
| CVE-2015-6237 | 1 Tripwire | 1 Ip360 | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The RPC service in Tripwire (formerly nCircle) IP360 VnE Manager 7.2.2 before 7.2.6 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication and (1) enumerate users, (2) reset passwords, or (3) manipulate IP filter restrictions via crafted "privileged commands." | ||||
| CVE-2013-4578 | 2 Oracle, Redhat | 5 Jdk, Jre, Enterprise Linux and 2 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| jarsigner in OpenJDK and Oracle Java SE before 7u51 allows remote attackers to bypass a code-signing protection mechanism and inject unsigned bytecode into a signed JAR file by leveraging improper file validation. | ||||