Export limit exceeded: 372505 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (372505 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-3303 | 1 Oracle | 1 Xml Gateway | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle XML Gateway component of Oracle E-Business Suite (subcomponent: Oracle Transport Agent). Supported versions that are affected are 12.1.1, 12.1.2, 12.1.3, 12.2.3, 12.2.4, 12.2.5 and 12.2.6. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle XML Gateway. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle XML Gateway, attacks may significantly impact additional products. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle XML Gateway accessible data as well as unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle XML Gateway accessible data. CVSS v3.0 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). | ||||
| CVE-2017-3312 | 4 Debian, Mariadb, Oracle and 1 more | 5 Debian Linux, Mariadb, Mysql and 2 more | 2025-04-20 | 6.7 Medium |
| Vulnerability in the MySQL Server component of Oracle MySQL (subcomponent: Server: Packaging). Supported versions that are affected are 5.5.53 and earlier, 5.6.34 and earlier and 5.7.16 and earlier. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where MySQL Server executes to compromise MySQL Server. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of MySQL Server. CVSS v3.0 Base Score 6.7 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). | ||||
| CVE-2017-3325 | 1 Oracle | 1 Siebel Ui Framework | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Vulnerability in the Siebel UI Framework component of Oracle Siebel CRM (subcomponent: EAI). The supported version that is affected is 16.1. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Siebel UI Framework. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Siebel UI Framework, attacks may significantly impact additional products. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Siebel UI Framework accessible data as well as unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Siebel UI Framework accessible data. CVSS v3.0 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). | ||||
| CVE-2017-3326 | 1 Oracle | 1 Common Applications | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Common Applications component of Oracle E-Business Suite (subcomponent: Role Summary). Supported versions that are affected are 12.1.1, 12.1.2, 12.1.3, 12.2.3, 12.2.4, 12.2.5 and 12.2.6. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Common Applications. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Common Applications, attacks may significantly impact additional products. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Common Applications accessible data as well as unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Common Applications accessible data. CVSS v3.0 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). | ||||
| CVE-2016-8882 | 1 Jasper Project | 1 Jasper | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The jpc_dec_tilefini function in libjasper/jpc/jpc_dec.c in JasPer before 1.900.8 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and crash) via a crafted file. | ||||
| CVE-2016-8030 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Virusscan Enterprise | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A memory corruption vulnerability in Scriptscan COM Object in McAfee VirusScan Enterprise 8.8 Patch 8 and earlier allows remote attackers to create a Denial of Service on the active Internet Explorer tab via a crafted HTML link. | ||||
| CVE-2016-7429 | 2 Ntp, Redhat | 2 Ntp, Enterprise Linux | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| NTP before 4.2.8p9 changes the peer structure to the interface it receives the response from a source, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (prevent communication with a source) by sending a response for a source to an interface the source does not use. | ||||
| CVE-2016-7426 | 4 Canonical, Hpe, Ntp and 1 more | 10 Ubuntu Linux, Hpux-ntp, Ntp and 7 more | 2025-04-20 | 7.5 High |
| NTP before 4.2.8p9 rate limits responses received from the configured sources when rate limiting for all associations is enabled, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (prevent responses from the sources) by sending responses with a spoofed source address. | ||||
| CVE-2016-7144 | 1 Unrealircd | 1 Unrealircd | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The m_authenticate function in modules/m_sasl.c in UnrealIRCd before 3.2.10.7 and 4.x before 4.0.6 allows remote attackers to spoof certificate fingerprints and consequently log in as another user via a crafted AUTHENTICATE parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2016-7101 | 1 Imagemagick | 1 Imagemagick | 2025-04-20 | 6.5 Medium |
| The SGI coder in ImageMagick before 7.0.2-10 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds read) via a large row value in an sgi file. | ||||
| CVE-2016-6915 | 2 Google, Nvidia | 9 Nexus 9, Pixel C, Shield Tablet and 6 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in nvhost_job.c in the NVIDIA video driver for Android, Shield TV before OTA 3.3, Shield Table before OTA 4.4, and Shield Table TK1 before OTA 1.5. | ||||
| CVE-2016-6887 | 1 Matrixssl | 1 Matrixssl | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The pstm_exptmod function in MatrixSSL 3.8.6 and earlier does not properly perform modular exponentiation, which might allow remote attackers to predict the secret key via a CRT attack. | ||||
| CVE-2016-6823 | 1 Imagemagick | 1 Imagemagick | 2025-04-20 | 7.5 High |
| Integer overflow in the BMP coder in ImageMagick before 7.0.2-10 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via crafted height and width values, which triggers an out-of-bounds write. | ||||
| CVE-2016-6526 | 1 Samsung | 1 Samsung Mobile | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The SpamCall Activity component in Telecom application on Samsung Note device L(5.0/5.1) and M(6.0) allows attackers to cause a denial of service (crash and reboot) or possibly gain privileges via a malformed serializable object. | ||||
| CVE-2016-5715 | 1 Puppet | 1 Puppet Enterprise | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Open redirect vulnerability in the Console in Puppet Enterprise 2015.x and 2016.x before 2016.4.0 allows remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary web sites and conduct phishing attacks via a // (slash slash) followed by a domain in the redirect parameter. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2015-6501. | ||||
| CVE-2016-3695 | 2 Linux, Redhat | 2 Linux Kernel, Enterprise Linux | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The einj_error_inject function in drivers/acpi/apei/einj.c in the Linux kernel allows local users to simulate hardware errors and consequently cause a denial of service by leveraging failure to disable APEI error injection through EINJ when securelevel is set. | ||||
| CVE-2016-3152 | 1 Barco | 2 Clickshare Csc-1, Clickshare Csc-1 Firmware | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Barco ClickShare CSC-1 devices with firmware before 01.09.03 allow remote attackers to obtain the root password by downloading and extracting the firmware image. | ||||
| CVE-2016-3151 | 1 Barco | 6 Clickshare Csc-1, Clickshare Csc-1 Firmware, Clickshare Cse-200 and 3 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Directory traversal vulnerability in the wallpaper parsing functionality in Barco ClickShare CSC-1 devices with firmware before 01.09.03, CSM-1 devices with firmware before 01.06.02, and CSE-200 devices with firmware before 01.03.02 allows remote attackers to read /etc/shadow via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2016-2233 | 1 Hexchat Project | 1 Hexchat | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in the inbound_cap_ls function in common/inbound.c in HexChat 2.10.2 allows remote IRC servers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a large number of options in a CAP LS message. | ||||
| CVE-2016-10142 | 2 Ietf, Redhat | 2 Ipv6, Enterprise Linux | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An issue was discovered in the IPv6 protocol specification, related to ICMP Packet Too Big (PTB) messages. (The scope of this CVE is all affected IPv6 implementations from all vendors.) The security implications of IP fragmentation have been discussed at length in [RFC6274] and [RFC7739]. An attacker can leverage the generation of IPv6 atomic fragments to trigger the use of fragmentation in an arbitrary IPv6 flow (in scenarios in which actual fragmentation of packets is not needed) and can subsequently perform any type of fragmentation-based attack against legacy IPv6 nodes that do not implement [RFC6946]. That is, employing fragmentation where not actually needed allows for fragmentation-based attack vectors to be employed, unnecessarily. We note that, unfortunately, even nodes that already implement [RFC6946] can be subject to DoS attacks as a result of the generation of IPv6 atomic fragments. Let us assume that Host A is communicating with Host B and that, as a result of the widespread dropping of IPv6 packets that contain extension headers (including fragmentation) [RFC7872], some intermediate node filters fragments between Host B and Host A. If an attacker sends a forged ICMPv6 PTB error message to Host B, reporting an MTU smaller than 1280, this will trigger the generation of IPv6 atomic fragments from that moment on (as required by [RFC2460]). When Host B starts sending IPv6 atomic fragments (in response to the received ICMPv6 PTB error message), these packets will be dropped, since we previously noted that IPv6 packets with extension headers were being dropped between Host B and Host A. Thus, this situation will result in a DoS scenario. Another possible scenario is that in which two BGP peers are employing IPv6 transport and they implement Access Control Lists (ACLs) to drop IPv6 fragments (to avoid control-plane attacks). If the aforementioned BGP peers drop IPv6 fragments but still honor received ICMPv6 PTB error messages, an attacker could easily attack the corresponding peering session by simply sending an ICMPv6 PTB message with a reported MTU smaller than 1280 bytes. Once the attack packet has been sent, the aforementioned routers will themselves be the ones dropping their own traffic. | ||||