Export limit exceeded: 369614 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (369614 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-45960 | 1 Tawk | 1 Tawk.to | 2025-10-14 | 6.1 Medium |
| Cross Site Scripting vulnerability in tawk.to Live Chat v.1.6.1 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the web application stores and displays user-supplied input without proper input validation or encoding | ||||
| CVE-2025-46018 | 1 Cscsw | 1 Pay Mobile | 2025-10-14 | 5.4 Medium |
| CSC Pay Mobile App 2.19.4 (fixed in version 2.20.0) contains a vulnerability allowing users to bypass payment authorization by disabling Bluetooth at a specific point during a transaction. This could result in unauthorized use of laundry services and potential financial loss. | ||||
| CVE-2020-24030 | 1 Forlogic | 1 Qualiex | 2025-10-14 | 9.8 Critical |
| ForLogic Qualiex v1 and v3 has weak token expiration. This allows remote unauthenticated privilege escalation and access to sensitive data via token reuse. NOTE: as of 2025-10-14, the Supplier's perspective is that this is "not exploitable in the current implementation. Tokens are properly expired, invalidated, and bound to session context. Attempts to alter the token payload to extend its validity do not affect server-side validation." | ||||
| CVE-2020-24029 | 1 Forlogic | 1 Qualiex | 2025-10-14 | 9.8 Critical |
| Because of unauthenticated password changes in ForLogic Qualiex v1 and v3, customer and admin permissions and data can be accessed via a simple request. NOTE: as of 2025-10-14, the Supplier's perspective is that this is "corrected in all maintained versions. Password reset requests are validated against registered user emails and require a valid, short-lived token." | ||||
| CVE-2020-24028 | 1 Forlogic | 1 Qualiex | 2025-10-14 | 8.8 High |
| ForLogic Qualiex v1 and v3 allows any authenticated customer to achieve privilege escalation via user creations, password changes, or user permission updates. NOTE: as of 2025-10-14, the Supplier's perspective is that this "does not allow administrative privilege gain. Authorization is enforced server-side, restricting actions to the user’s own permission scope." | ||||
| CVE-2021-31895 | 1 Siemens | 104 Ruggedcom I800, Ruggedcom I801, Ruggedcom I802 and 101 more | 2025-10-14 | 8.1 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM i800 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM i801 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM i802 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM i803 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM M2100 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM M2200 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM M969 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RMC30 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RP110 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS1600 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS1600F (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS1600T (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS400 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS401 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS416 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS416P (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V5.X (All versions < 5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RS8000 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS8000A (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS8000H (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS8000T (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RS900G (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RS900GP (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS900L (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS900W (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS910 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS910L (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS910W (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS920L (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS920W (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS930L (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS930W (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS940G (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RS969 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RSG2200 (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RSG907R (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RSG908C (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RSG909R (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RSG910C (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V4.X (All versions < V4.3.7), RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V5.X (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RSL910 (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RST2228 (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RST2228P (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RST916C (All versions < V5.5.4), RUGGEDCOM RST916P (All versions < V5.5.4). The DHCP client in affected devices fails to properly sanitize incoming DHCP packets. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause memory to be overwritten, potentially allowing remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2014-2379 | 1 Sensysnetworks | 4 Trafficdot, Vds, Vsn240-f and 1 more | 2025-10-13 | N/A |
| Sensys Networks VSN240-F and VSN240-T sensors VDS before 2.10.1 and TrafficDOT before 2.10.3 do not use encryption, which allows remote attackers to interfere with traffic control by replaying transmissions on a wireless network. | ||||
| CVE-2014-2378 | 1 Sensysnetworks | 4 Trafficdot, Vds, Vsn240-f and 1 more | 2025-10-13 | N/A |
| Sensys Networks VSN240-F and VSN240-T sensors VDS before 2.10.1 and TrafficDOT before 2.10.3 do not verify the integrity of downloaded updates, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a Trojan horse update. | ||||
| CVE-2014-2377 | 1 Ecava | 1 Integraxor | 2025-10-13 | N/A |
| Ecava IntegraXor SCADA Server Stable 4.1.4360 and earlier and Beta 4.1.4392 and earlier allows remote attackers to discover full pathnames via an application tag. | ||||
| CVE-2014-2376 | 1 Ecava | 1 Integraxor | 2025-10-13 | N/A |
| SQL injection vulnerability in Ecava IntegraXor SCADA Server Stable 4.1.4360 and earlier and Beta 4.1.4392 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2014-2375 | 1 Ecava | 1 Integraxor | 2025-10-13 | N/A |
| Ecava IntegraXor SCADA Server Stable 4.1.4360 and earlier and Beta 4.1.4392 and earlier allows remote attackers to read or write to arbitrary files, and obtain sensitive information or cause a denial of service (disk consumption), via the CSV export feature. | ||||
| CVE-2014-2374 | 1 Accuenergy | 2 Acuvim Ii, Axm-net | 2025-10-13 | N/A |
| The AXN-NET Ethernet module accessory 3.04 for the Accuenergy Acuvim II allows remote attackers to discover passwords and modify settings via vectors involving JavaScript. | ||||
| CVE-2014-2373 | 1 Accuenergy | 2 Acuvim Ii, Axm-net | 2025-10-13 | N/A |
| The AXN-NET Ethernet module accessory 3.04 for the Accuenergy Acuvim II allows remote attackers to discover passwords and modify settings via vectors involving JavaScript. | ||||
| CVE-2014-0786 | 1 Ecava | 1 Integraxor | 2025-10-13 | N/A |
| Ecava IntegraXor before 4.1.4393 allows remote attackers to read cleartext credentials for administrative accounts via SELECT statements that leverage the guest role. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9723 | 1 Portabilis | 1 I-educar | 2025-10-13 | 3.5 Low |
| A vulnerability was found in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. This affects an unknown function of the file /intranet/educar_tipo_regime_cad.php. Performing manipulation of the argument nm_tipo results in cross site scripting. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9722 | 1 Portabilis | 1 I-educar | 2025-10-13 | 3.5 Low |
| A vulnerability has been found in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /intranet/educar_tipo_ocorrencia_disciplinar_cad.php. Such manipulation of the argument nm_tipo/descricao leads to cross site scripting. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9721 | 1 Portabilis | 1 I-educar | 2025-10-13 | 3.5 Low |
| A flaw has been found in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /module/FormulaMedia/edit. This manipulation of the argument nome/formulaMedia causes cross site scripting. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9720 | 1 Portabilis | 1 I-educar | 2025-10-13 | 3.5 Low |
| A vulnerability was detected in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /module/TabelaArredondamento/edit of the component Cadastrar tabela de arredondamento Page. The manipulation of the argument Nome results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6211 | 2025-10-13 | N/A | ||
| loading template... | ||||
| CVE-2025-44040 | 1 Orangehrm | 1 Orangehrm | 2025-10-13 | 7.2 High |
| An issue in OrangeHRM v.5.7 allows an attacker to escalate privileges via UserService.php and the checkForOldHash function. Authentication decisions may be made via PHP loose-equality comparisons if a specific MD5 value is present in the credential store. NOTE: this is disputed by the Supplier because an adversary has no way to place the specific MD5 value into the credential store (unless they already have full privileges) and because the specific MD5 value would not realistically be present otherwise. | ||||