Export limit exceeded: 10641 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (10641 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-12048 | 1 Lenovo | 1 Scanner Pro | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| An arbitrary file upload vulnerability was reported in the Lenovo Scanner Pro client during an internal security assessment that could allow remote code execution or unauthorized control of the affected system. | ||||
| CVE-2025-68271 | 1 Openc3 | 1 Cosmos | 2026-04-15 | 10 Critical |
| OpenC3 COSMOS provides the functionality needed to send commands to and receive data from one or more embedded systems. From 5.0.0 to 6.10.1, OpenC3 COSMOS contains a critical remote code execution vulnerability reachable through the JSON-RPC API. When a JSON-RPC request uses the string form of certain APIs, attacker-controlled parameter text is parsed into values using String#convert_to_value. For array-like inputs, convert_to_value executes eval(). Because the cmd code path parses the command string before calling authorize(), an unauthenticated attacker can trigger Ruby code execution even though the request ultimately fails authorization (401). This vulnerability is fixed in 6.10.2. | ||||
| CVE-2025-65108 | 1 Simonhaenisch | 1 Md-to-pdf | 2026-04-15 | 10 Critical |
| md-to-pdf is a CLI tool for converting Markdown files to PDF using Node.js and headless Chrome. Prior to version 5.2.5, a Markdown front-matter block that contains JavaScript delimiter causes the JS engine in gray-matter library to execute arbitrary code in the Markdown to PDF converter process of md-to-pdf library, resulting in remote code execution. This issue has been patched in version 5.2.5. | ||||
| CVE-2025-50475 | 1 Russound | 1 Mbx Pre D67f | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| An OS command injection vulnerability exists in Russound MBX-PRE-D67F firmware version 3.1.6, allowing unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary commands as root via crafted input to the hostname parameter in network configuration requests. This vulnerability stems from improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command within the network configuration handler, enabling remote code execution with the highest privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2025-7847 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| The AI Engine plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to missing file type validation in the rest_simpleFileUpload() function in versions 2.9.3 and 2.9.4. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to upload arbitrary files on the affected site's server when the REST API is enabled, which may make remote code execution possible. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8917 | 1 Allegroai | 1 Clearml | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A vulnerability in allegroai/clearml version v2.0.1 allows for path traversal due to improper handling of symbolic and hard links in the `safe_extract` function. This flaw can lead to arbitrary file writes outside the intended directory, potentially resulting in remote code execution if critical files are overwritten. | ||||
| CVE-2013-10055 | 1 Havalite | 2 Cms, Havalite | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| An unauthenticated arbitrary file upload vulnerability exists in Havalite CMS version 1.1.7 (and possibly earlier) in the upload.php script. The application fails to enforce proper file extension validation and authentication checks, allowing remote attackers to upload malicious PHP files via a crafted multipart/form-data POST request. Once uploaded, the attacker can access the file directly under havalite/tmp/files/, resulting in remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2013-10058 | 1 Linksys | 2 Wrt160nl, Wrt160nv2 | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| An authenticated OS command injection vulnerability exists in various Linksys router models (tested on WRT160Nv2) running firmware version v2.0.03 via the apply.cgi endpoint. The web interface fails to properly sanitize user-supplied input passed to the ping_size parameter during diagnostic operations. An attacker with valid credentials can inject arbitrary shell commands, enabling remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45198 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| insightsoftware Spark JDBC 2.6.21 has a remote code execution vulnerability. Attackers can inject malicious parameters into the JDBC URL, triggering JNDI injection during the process when the JDBC Driver uses this URL to connect to the database. This can further lead to remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2024-42911 | 2026-04-15 | 7.4 High | ||
| ECOVACS Robotics Deebot T20 OMNI and T20e OMNI before 1.24.0 was discovered to contain a WiFi Remote Code Execution vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2024-3412 | 2026-04-15 | 9.1 Critical | ||
| The WP STAGING WordPress Backup Plugin – Migration Backup Restore plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to missing file type validation in the wpstg_processing AJAX action in all versions up to, and including, 3.4.3. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with administrator-level access and above, to upload arbitrary files on the affected site's server which may make remote code execution possible. | ||||
| CVE-2025-56399 | 2 Alexusmai, Laravel | 2 Laravel-file-manager, Laravel | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| alexusmai laravel-file-manager 3.3.1 and before allows an authenticated attacker to achieve Remote Code Execution (RCE) through a crafted file upload. A file with a '.png` extension containing PHP code can be uploaded via the file manager interface. Although the upload appears to fail client-side validation, the file is still saved on the server. The attacker can then use the rename API to change the file extension to `.php`, and upon accessing it via a public URL, the server executes the embedded code. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53867 | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| Island Lake WebBatch before 2025C allows Remote Code Execution via a crafted URL. | ||||
| CVE-2025-25246 | 1 Netgear | 2 Xr1000, Xr500 | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High |
| NETGEAR XR1000 before 1.0.0.74, XR1000v2 before 1.1.0.22, and XR500 before 2.3.2.134 allow remote code execution by unauthenticated users. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13426 | 1 Google | 1 Cloud Apigee | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A vulnerability exists in Google Apigee's JavaCallout policy https://docs.apigee.com/api-platform/reference/policies/java-callout-policy that allows for remote code execution. It is possible for a user to write a JavaCallout that injected a malicious object into the MessageContext to execute arbitrary Java code and system commands at runtime, leading to unauthorized access to data, lateral movement within the network, and access to backend systems. The Apigee hybrid versions below have all been updated to protect from this vulnerability: * Hybrid_1.11.2+ * Hybrid_1.12.4+ * Hybrid_1.13.3+ * Hybrid_1.14.1+ * OPDK_5202+ * OPDK_5300+ | ||||
| CVE-2025-12486 | 1 Heimdalldata | 1 Database Proxy | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Heimdall Data Database Proxy Cross-Site Scripting Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Heimdall Data Database Proxy. Minimal user interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the database event logs. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can lead to the injection of arbitrary script. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to interact with the application in the context of the target user. Was ZDI-CAN-24755. | ||||
| CVE-2025-10353 | 1 Melistechnology | 1 Melis Platform | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| File upload leading to remote code execution (RCE) in the “melis-cms-slider” module of Melis Technology's Melis Platform. This vulnerability allows an attacker to upload a malicious file via a POST request to '/melis/MelisCmsSlider/MelisCmsSliderDetails/saveDetailsForm' using the 'mcsdetail_img' parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2025-67489 | 1 Vitejs | 1 Plugin-rsc | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| @vitejs/plugin-rs provides React Server Components (RSC) support for Vite. Versions 0.5.5 and below are vulnerable to arbitrary remote code execution on the development server through unsafe dynamic imports in server function APIs (loadServerAction, decodeReply, decodeAction) when integrated into RSC applications that expose server function endpoints. Attackers with network access to the development server can read/modify files, exfiltrate sensitive data (source code, environment variables, credentials), or pivot to other internal services. While this affects development servers only, the risk increases when using vite --host to expose the server on all network interfaces. This issue is fixed in version 0.5.6. | ||||
| CVE-2025-58438 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Windows | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| internetarchive is a Python and Command-Line Interface to Archive.org In versions 5.5.0 and below, there is a directory traversal (path traversal) vulnerability in the File.download() method of the internetarchive library. The file.download() method does not properly sanitize user-supplied filenames or validate the final download path. A maliciously crafted filename could contain path traversal sequences (e.g., ../../../../windows/system32/file.txt) or illegal characters that, when processed, would cause the file to be written outside of the intended target directory. An attacker could potentially overwrite critical system files or application configuration files, leading to a denial of service, privilege escalation, or remote code execution, depending on the context in which the library is used. The vulnerability is particularly critical for users on Windows systems, but all operating systems are affected. This issue is fixed in version 5.5.1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-55108 | 1 Bmc | 1 Control-m/agent | 2026-04-15 | 10 Critical |
| The Control-M/Agent is vulnerable to unauthenticated remote code execution, arbitrary file read and write and similar unauthorized actions when mutual SSL/TLS authentication is not enabled (i.e. in the default configuration). NOTE: * The vendor believes that this vulnerability only occurs when documented security best practices are not followed. BMC has always strongly recommended to use security best practices such as configuring SSL/TLS between Control-M Server and Agent. * The vendor notifies that Control-M/Agent is not impacted in Control-M SaaS | ||||