Export limit exceeded: 10728 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 363618 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (363618 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-50612 | 2025-12-30 | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2022. Notes: none. | ||||
| CVE-2022-50611 | 2025-12-30 | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2022. Notes: none. | ||||
| CVE-2022-50610 | 2025-12-30 | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2022. Notes: none. | ||||
| CVE-2022-50609 | 2025-12-30 | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2022. Notes: none. | ||||
| CVE-2022-50608 | 2025-12-30 | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2022. Notes: none. | ||||
| CVE-2022-50607 | 2025-12-30 | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2022. Notes: none. | ||||
| CVE-2022-50606 | 2025-12-30 | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2022. Notes: none. | ||||
| CVE-2022-50605 | 2025-12-30 | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2022. Notes: none. | ||||
| CVE-2022-50604 | 2025-12-30 | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2022. Notes: none. | ||||
| CVE-2022-50603 | 2025-12-30 | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2022. Notes: none. | ||||
| CVE-2022-50602 | 2025-12-30 | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2022. Notes: none. | ||||
| CVE-2022-50601 | 2025-12-30 | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2022. Notes: none. | ||||
| CVE-2022-50600 | 2025-12-30 | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2022. Notes: none. | ||||
| CVE-2022-50599 | 2025-12-30 | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2022. Notes: none. | ||||
| CVE-2022-50598 | 2025-12-30 | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2022. Notes: none. | ||||
| CVE-2022-50597 | 2025-12-30 | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE RECORD. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This record was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2022. Notes: none. | ||||
| CVE-2023-36377 | 1 Osslsigncode Project | 1 Osslsigncode | 2025-12-30 | 7.8 High |
| Buffer Overflow vulnerability in mtrojnar osslsigncode v.2.3 and before allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted .exe, .sys, and .dll files. | ||||
| CVE-2022-2068 | 7 Broadcom, Debian, Fedoraproject and 4 more | 49 Sannav, Debian Linux, Fedora and 46 more | 2025-12-30 | 9.8 Critical |
| In addition to the c_rehash shell command injection identified in CVE-2022-1292, further circumstances where the c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection were found by code review. When the CVE-2022-1292 was fixed it was not discovered that there are other places in the script where the file names of certificates being hashed were possibly passed to a command executed through the shell. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script. Use of the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL rehash command line tool. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.4 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2,3.0.3). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1p (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1o). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2zf (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2ze). | ||||
| CVE-2022-1292 | 7 Debian, Fedoraproject, Netapp and 4 more | 58 Debian Linux, Fedora, A250 and 55 more | 2025-12-30 | 9.8 Critical |
| The c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script. Use of the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL rehash command line tool. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1o (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1n). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2ze (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2zd). | ||||
| CVE-2025-61924 | 2 Prestashop, Prestashopcorp | 3 Prestashop, Prestashop Checkout, Checkout | 2025-12-29 | 3.8 Low |
| PrestaShop Checkout is the PrestaShop official payment module in partnership with PayPal. In versions prior to 4.4.1 and 5.0.5, the Target PayPal merchant account hijacking from backoffice due to wrong usage of the PHP array_search(). The vulnerability is fixed in versions 4.4.1 and 5.0.5. No known workarounds exist. | ||||