Export limit exceeded: 363819 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (363819 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-24319 | 1 F5 | 1 Big-ip Next Central Manager | 2026-02-04 | 6.5 Medium |
| When BIG-IP Next Central Manager is running, undisclosed requests to the BIG-IP Next Central Manager API can cause the BIG-IP Next Central Manager Node's Kubernetes service to terminate. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. | ||||
| CVE-2024-32761 | 1 F5 | 22 Big-ip, Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager and 19 more | 2026-02-04 | 6.5 Medium |
| Under certain conditions, a data leak may occur in the Traffic Management Microkernels (TMMs) of BIG-IP tenants running on VELOS and rSeries platforms. This leak occurs randomly and cannot be deliberately triggered. If it occurs, it may leak up to 64 bytes of non-contiguous randomized bytes. Under rare conditions, this may lead to a TMM restart, affecting availability. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated | ||||
| CVE-2025-13473 | 1 Djangoproject | 1 Django | 2026-02-04 | 5.3 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in 6.0 before 6.0.2, 5.2 before 5.2.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.28. The `django.contrib.auth.handlers.modwsgi.check_password()` function for authentication via `mod_wsgi` allows remote attackers to enumerate users via a timing attack. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Stackered for reporting this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14550 | 1 Djangoproject | 1 Django | 2026-02-04 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in 6.0 before 6.0.2, 5.2 before 5.2.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.28. `ASGIRequest` allows a remote attacker to cause a potential denial-of-service via a crafted request with multiple duplicate headers. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Jiyong Yang for reporting this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54160 | 1 Synology | 2 Beedrive, Beedrive For Desktop | 2026-02-04 | 7.8 High |
| Improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in BeeDrive in Synology BeeDrive for desktop before 1.4.2-13960 allows local users to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54159 | 1 Synology | 2 Beedrive, Beedrive For Desktop | 2026-02-04 | 7.5 High |
| Missing authorization vulnerability in BeeDrive in Synology BeeDrive for desktop before 1.4.2-13960 allows remote attackers to delete arbitrary files via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8074 | 1 Synology | 2 Beedrive, Beedrive For Desktop | 2026-02-04 | 5.6 Medium |
| Origin validation error vulnerability in BeeDrive in Synology BeeDrive for desktop before 1.4.3-13973 allows local users to write arbitrary files with non-sensitive information via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2019-19006 | 1 Sangoma | 1 Freepbx | 2026-02-04 | 9.8 Critical |
| Sangoma FreePBX 115.0.16.26 and below, 14.0.13.11 and below, 13.0.197.13 and below have Incorrect Access Control. | ||||
| CVE-2025-62610 | 1 Hono | 1 Hono | 2026-02-04 | 8.1 High |
| Hono is a Web application framework that provides support for any JavaScript runtime. In versions from 1.1.0 to before 4.10.2, Hono’s JWT Auth Middleware does not provide a built-in aud (Audience) verification option, which can cause confused-deputy / token-mix-up issues: an API may accept a valid token that was issued for a different audience (e.g., another service) when multiple services share the same issuer/keys. This can lead to unintended cross-service access. Hono’s docs list verification options for iss/nbf/iat/exp only, with no aud support; RFC 7519 requires that when an aud claim is present, tokens MUST be rejected unless the processing party identifies itself in that claim. This issue has been patched in version 4.10.2. | ||||
| CVE-2021-39935 | 1 Gitlab | 1 Gitlab | 2026-02-04 | 6.8 Medium |
| An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions starting from 10.5 before 14.3.6, all versions starting from 14.4 before 14.4.4, all versions starting from 14.5 before 14.5.2. Unauthorized external users could perform Server Side Requests via the CI Lint API | ||||
| CVE-2025-50537 | 2 Eslint, Openjsf | 2 Eslint, Eslint | 2026-02-04 | 5.5 Medium |
| Stack overflow vulnerability in eslint before 9.26.0 when serializing objects with circular references in eslint/lib/shared/serialization.js. The exploit is triggered via the RuleTester.run() method, which validates test cases and checks for duplicates. During validation, the internal function checkDuplicateTestCase() is called, which in turn uses the isSerializable() function for serialization checks. When a circular reference object is passed in, isSerializable() enters infinite recursion, ultimately causing a stack overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48780 | 1 Scshr | 1 Hr Portal | 2026-02-04 | 9.8 Critical |
| A deserialization of untrusted data vulnerability in the download file function of Soar Cloud HRD Human Resource Management System through version 7.3.2025.0408 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary system commands via a crafted serialized object. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48781 | 1 Scshr | 1 Hr Portal | 2026-02-04 | 7.5 High |
| An external control of file name or path vulnerability in the download file function of Soar Cloud HRD Human Resource Management System through version 7.3.2025.0408 allows remote attackers to obtain partial files by specifying arbitrary file paths. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48782 | 1 Scshr | 1 Hr Portal | 2026-02-04 | 9.8 Critical |
| An unrestricted upload of file with dangerous type vulnerability in the upload file function of Soar Cloud HRD Human Resource Management System through version 7.3.2025.0408 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary system commands via a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48783 | 1 Scshr | 1 Hr Portal | 2026-02-04 | 7.5 High |
| An external control of file name or path vulnerability in the delete file function of Soar Cloud HRD Human Resource Management System through version 7.3.2025.0408 allows remote attackers to delete partial files by specifying arbitrary file paths. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48784 | 1 Scshr | 1 Hr Portal | 2026-02-04 | 7.5 High |
| A missing authorization vulnerability in Soar Cloud HRD Human Resource Management System through version 7.3.2025.0408 allows remote attackers to modify system settings without prior authorization. | ||||
| CVE-2025-5192 | 1 Scshr | 1 Hr Portal | 2026-02-04 | 7.5 High |
| A missing authentication for critical function vulnerability in the client application of Soar Cloud HRD Human Resource Management System through version 7.3.2025.0408 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication and access application functions. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45326 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortideceptor | 2026-02-04 | 3.9 Low |
| An Improper Access Control vulnerability [CWE-284] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiDeceptor 6.0.0, FortiDeceptor 5.3 all versions, FortiDeceptor 5.2 all versions, FortiDeceptor 5.1 all versions, FortiDeceptor 5.0 all versions may allow an authenticated attacker with none privileges to perform operations on the central management appliance via crafted requests. | ||||
| CVE-2024-35280 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortideceptor | 2026-02-04 | 5.1 Medium |
| A improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiDeceptor 5.3.0, FortiDeceptor 5.2.0, FortiDeceptor 5.1 all versions, FortiDeceptor 5.0 all versions, FortiDeceptor 4.3 all versions, FortiDeceptor 4.2 all versions, FortiDeceptor 4.1 all versions, FortiDeceptor 4.0 all versions, FortiDeceptor 3.3 all versions, FortiDeceptor 3.2 all versions, FortiDeceptor 3.1 all versions, FortiDeceptor 3.0 all versions may allow an attacker to perform a reflected cross-site scripting attack in the recovery endpoints | ||||
| CVE-2026-24602 | 2 Raptive, Wordpress | 2 Raptive Ads, Wordpress | 2026-02-04 | N/A |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. This is a false positive. According to the vendor, the function identified as a vulnerability is intentional and part of the expected design. | ||||