Export limit exceeded: 373612 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 373612 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 373612 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (373612 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-38822 | 2026-04-15 | 2.7 Low | ||
| Multiple methods in the salt master skip minion token validation. Therefore a misbehaving minion can impersonate another minion. | ||||
| CVE-2024-38823 | 2026-04-15 | 2.7 Low | ||
| Salt's request server is vulnerable to replay attacks when not using a TLS encrypted transport. | ||||
| CVE-2024-38825 | 2026-04-15 | 6.4 Medium | ||
| The salt.auth.pki module does not properly authenticate callers. The "password" field contains a public certificate which is validated against a CA certificate by the module. This is not pki authentication, as the caller does not need access to the corresponding private key for the authentication attempt to be accepted. | ||||
| CVE-2024-38826 | 1 Cloudfoundry | 1 Cloud Foundry | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Authenticated users can upload specifically crafted files to leak server resources. This behavior can potentially be used to run a denial of service attack against Cloud Controller. The Cloud Foundry project recommends upgrading the following releases: * Upgrade capi release version to 1.194.0 or greater * Upgrade cf-deployment version to v44.1.0 or greater. This includes a patched capi release | ||||
| CVE-2024-38827 | 2026-04-15 | 4.8 Medium | ||
| The usage of String.toLowerCase() and String.toUpperCase() has some Locale dependent exceptions that could potentially result in authorization rules not working properly. | ||||
| CVE-2024-38828 | 1 Vmware | 1 Spring | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| Spring MVC controller methods with an @RequestBody byte[] method parameter are vulnerable to a DoS attack. | ||||
| CVE-2024-38867 | 2026-04-15 | 5.9 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIPROTEC 5 6MD84 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 6MD85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 6MD85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 6MD86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 6MD86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 6MD89 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 6MU85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 7KE85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7KE85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 7SA82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SA82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SA84 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SA86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SA86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SA87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SA87 (CP300) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SD82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SD82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SD84 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SD86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SD86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SD87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SD87 (CP300) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ81 (CP100) (All versions < V8.89), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ81 (CP150) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.89), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SK82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.89), SIPROTEC 5 7SK82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SK85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SK85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SL82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SL82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SL86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SL86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SL87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SL87 (CP300) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SS85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SS85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 7ST85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7ST85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 7ST86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 7SX82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7SX85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7UM85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 7UT82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.90), SIPROTEC 5 7UT82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7UT85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7UT86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7UT87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT87 (CP300) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7VE85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 7VK87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7VK87 (CP300) (All versions < V9.65), SIPROTEC 5 7VU85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BA-2EL (Rev.1) (All versions < V9.62 installed on CP150 and CP300 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BA-2EL (Rev.1) (All versions installed on CP200 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BA-2EL (Rev.1) (All versions < V8.89 installed on CP100 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BB-2FO (Rev. 1) (All versions installed on CP200 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BB-2FO (Rev. 1) (All versions < V9.62 installed on CP150 and CP300 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BB-2FO (Rev. 1) (All versions < V8.89 installed on CP100 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BD-2FO (All versions < V9.62), SIPROTEC 5 Compact 7SX800 (CP050) (All versions < V9.64). The affected devices are supporting weak ciphers on several ports (443/tcp for web, 4443/tcp for DIGSI 5 and configurable port for syslog over TLS). This could allow an unauthorized attacker in a man-in-the-middle position to decrypt any data passed over to and from those ports. | ||||
| CVE-2024-37794 | 1 Cvc5 | 1 Cvc5 | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| Improper input validation in CVC5 Solver v1.1.3 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted SMT2 input file. | ||||
| CVE-2024-37795 | 1 Cvc5 | 1 Cvc5 | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| A segmentation fault in CVC5 Solver v1.1.3 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted SMT-LIB input file containing the `set-logic` command with specific formatting errors. | ||||
| CVE-2024-3780 | 2026-04-15 | 7.8 High | ||
| A vulnerability of Information Exposure has been found on Technicolor CGA2121 affecting the version 1.01, this vulnerability allows a local attacker to obtain sensitive information stored on the device such as wifi network's SSID and their respective passwords. | ||||
| CVE-2024-37820 | 1 Pingcap | 1 Tidb | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium |
| A nil pointer dereference in PingCAP TiDB v8.2.0-alpha-216-gfe5858b allows attackers to crash the application via expression.inferCollation. | ||||
| CVE-2024-37825 | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| An issue in EnvisionWare Computer Access & Reservation Control SelfCheck v1.0 (fixed in OneStop 3.2.0.27184 Hotfix May 2024) allows unauthenticated attackers on the same network to perform a directory traversal. | ||||
| CVE-2024-37791 | 1 Duxcms Project | 1 Duxcms | 2026-04-15 | 6 Medium |
| DuxCMS3 v3.1.3 was discovered to contain a SQL injection vulnerability via the keyword parameter at /article/Content/index?class_id. | ||||
| CVE-2024-37783 | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium | ||
| A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Gladinet CentreStack v13.12.9934.54690 allows attackers to inject malicious JavaScript into the web browser of a victim via the sessionId parameter at /portal/ForgotPassword.aspx. | ||||
| CVE-2024-37782 | 1 Gladinet | 1 Centrestack | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| An LDAP injection vulnerability in the login page of Gladinet CentreStack v13.12.9934.54690 allows attackers to access sensitive data or execute arbitrary commands via a crafted payload injected into the username field. | ||||
| CVE-2024-37742 | 1 Ethz | 1 Safe Exam Browser | 2026-04-15 | 8.2 High |
| Insecure Access Control in Safe Exam Browser (SEB) = 3.5.0 on Windows. The vulnerability allows an attacker to share clipboard data between the SEB kiosk mode and the underlying system, compromising exam integrity. By exploiting this flaw, an attacker can bypass exam controls and gain an unfair advantage during exams. | ||||
| CVE-2024-36434 | 1 Supermicro | 3 X11dph-i, X11dph-t, X11dph-tq | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| An SMM callout vulnerability was discovered in Supermicro X11DPH-T, X11DPH-Tq, and X11DPH-i motherboards with BIOS firmware before 4.4. | ||||
| CVE-2024-36435 | 1 Supermicro | 355 B12dpe-6 Firmware, B12dpt-6 Firmware, B12spe-cpu-25g Firmware and 352 more | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| An issue was discovered on Supermicro BMC firmware in select X11, X12, H12, B12, X13, H13, and B13 motherboards (and CMM6 modules). An unauthenticated user can post crafted data to the interface that triggers a stack buffer overflow, and may lead to arbitrary remote code execution on a BMC. | ||||
| CVE-2024-36438 | 1 Elinksmart | 1 Smart Cabinet Lock | 2026-04-15 | 7.3 High |
| eLinkSmart Hidden Smart Cabinet Lock 2024-05-22 has Incorrect Access Control and fails to perform an authorization check which can lead to card duplication and other attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2024-36439 | 2026-04-15 | 9.4 Critical | ||
| Swissphone DiCal-RED 4009 devices allow a remote attacker to gain access to the administrative web interface via the device password's hash value, without knowing the actual device password. | ||||