Export limit exceeded: 372838 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (372838 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-46583 | 1 Zte | 1 Mc889a | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| There is a Denial of Service（DoS）vulnerability in the ZTE MC889A Pro product. Due to insufficient validation of the input parameters of the Short Message Service interface, allowing an attacker to exploit it to carry out a DoS attack. | ||||
| CVE-2025-46599 | 1 K3s | 1 K3s | 2026-04-15 | 6.8 Medium |
| CNCF K3s 1.32 before 1.32.4-rc1+k3s1 has a Kubernetes kubelet configuration change with the unintended consequence that, in some situations, ReadOnlyPort is set to 10255. For example, the default behavior of a K3s online installation might allow unauthenticated access to this port, exposing credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41665 | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| An low privileged remote attacker can enforce the watchdog of the affected devices to reboot the PLC due to incorrect default permissions of a config file. | ||||
| CVE-2025-46613 | 1 Openplcproject | 1 Openplc | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| OpenPLC 3 through 64f9c11 has server.cpp Memory Corruption because a thread may access handleConnections arguments after the parent stack frame becomes unavailable. | ||||
| CVE-2025-46616 | 1 Quantum | 1 Stornext | 2026-04-15 | 9.9 Critical |
| Quantum StorNext Web GUI API before 7.2.4 allows potential Arbitrary Remote Code Execution (RCE) via upload of a file. This affects StorNext RYO before 7.2.4, StorNext Xcellis Workflow Director before 7.2.4, and ActiveScale Cold Storage. | ||||
| CVE-2025-46617 | 2026-04-15 | 7.2 High | ||
| Quantum StorNext Web GUI API before 7.2.4 grants access to internal StorNext configuration and unauthorized modification of some software configuration parameters via undocumented user credentials. This affects StorNext RYO before 7.2.4, StorNext Xcellis Workflow Director before 7.2.4, and ActiveScale Cold Storage. | ||||
| CVE-2025-40555 | 2026-04-15 | 4.7 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in APOGEE PXC+TALON TC Series (BACnet) (All versions). Affected devices start sending unsolicited BACnet broadcast messages after processing a specific BACnet createObject request. This could allow an attacker residing in the same BACnet network to send a specially crafted message that results in a partial denial of service condition of the targeted device, and potentially reduce the availability of BACnet network. A power cycle is required to restore the device's normal operation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4665 | 2 Arshid, Wordpress | 2 Wordpress Contact Form Cfdb7, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 9.6 Critical |
| WordPress plugin Contact Form CFDB7 versions up to and including 1.3.2 are affected by a pre-authentication SQL injection vulnerability that cascades into insecure deserialization (PHP Object Injection). The weakness arises due to insufficient validation of user input in plugin endpoints, allowing crafted input to influence backend queries in unexpected ways. Using specially crafted payloads, this can escalate into unsafe deserialization, enabling arbitrary object injection in PHP. Although the issue is remotely exploitable without authentication, it does require a crafted interaction with the affected endpoint in order to trigger successfully. | ||||
| CVE-2025-46655 | 1 Hackmd | 1 Codimd | 2026-04-15 | 4.9 Medium |
| CodiMD through 2.5.4 has a CSP-based protection mechanism against XSS through uploaded SVG documents containing JavaScript, but it can be bypassed in certain cases of different-origin file storage, such as AWS S3. NOTE: it can be considered a user error if AWS is employed for hosting untrusted JavaScript content, but the selected architecture within AWS does not have components that are able to insert Content-Security-Policy headers. | ||||
| CVE-2025-46686 | 1 Redis | 1 Redis | 2026-04-15 | 3.5 Low |
| Redis through 8.0.3 allows memory consumption via a multi-bulk command composed of many bulks, sent by an authenticated user. This occurs because the server allocates memory for the command arguments of every bulk, even when the command is skipped because of insufficient permissions. NOTE: this is disputed by the Supplier because abuse of the commands network protocol is not a violation of the Redis Security Model. | ||||
| CVE-2025-42873 | 2 Sap, Sap Se | 2 Sapui5, Sapui5 | 2026-04-15 | 5.9 Medium |
| SAPUI5 (and OpenUI5) packages use outdated 3rd party libraries with known security vulnerabilities. When markdown-it encounters special malformed input, it fails to terminate properly, resulting in an infinite loop. This Denial of Service via infinite loop causes high CPU usage and system unresponsiveness due to a blocked processing thread. This vulnerability has no impact on confidentiality or integrity but has a high impact on system availability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-46744 | 2026-04-15 | 2.7 Low | ||
| An authenticated administrator could modify the Created By username for a user account | ||||
| CVE-2025-42891 | 1 Sap | 1 Enterprise Search For Abap | 2026-04-15 | 5.5 Medium |
| Due to a missing authorization check in SAP Enterprise Search for ABAP, an attacker with high privileges may read and export the contents of database tables into an ABAP report. This could lead to a high impact on data confidentiality and a low impact on data integrity. There is no impact on application's availability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-46735 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Terraform WinDNS Provider allows users to manage their Windows DNS server resources through Terraform. A security issue has been found in Terraform WinDNS Provider before version `1.0.5`. The `windns_record` resource did not sanitize the input variables. This could lead to authenticated command injection in the underlyding powershell command prompt. Version 1.0.5 contains a fix for the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-46733 | 2026-04-15 | 7.9 High | ||
| OP-TEE is a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) designed as companion to a non-secure Linux kernel running on Arm; Cortex-A cores using the TrustZone technology. In version 4.5.0, using a specially crafted tee-supplicant binary running in REE userspace, an attacker can trigger a panic in a TA that uses the libutee Secure Storage API. Many functions in libutee, specifically those which make up the Secure Storage API, will panic if a system call returns an unexpected return code. This behavior is mandated by the TEE Internal Core API specification. However, in OP-TEE’s implementation, return codes of secure storage operations are passed through unsanitized from the REE tee-supplicant, through the Linux kernel tee-driver, through the OP-TEE kernel, back to libutee. Thus, an attacker with access to REE userspace, and the ability to stop tee-supplicant and replace it with their own process (generally trivial for a root user, and depending on the way permissions are set up, potentially available even to less privileged users) can run a malicious tee-supplicant process that responds to storage requests with unexpected response codes, triggering a panic in the requesting TA. This is particularly dangerous for TAs built with `TA_FLAG_SINGLE_INSTANCE` (corresponding to `gpd.ta.singleInstance` and `TA_FLAG_INSTANCE_KEEP_ALIVE` (corresponding to `gpd.ta.keepAlive`). The behavior of these TAs may depend on memory that is preserved between sessions, and the ability of an attacker to panic the TA and reload it with a clean memory space can compromise the behavior of those TAs. A critical example of this is the optee_ftpm TA. It uses the kept alive memory to hold PCR values, which crucially must be non-resettable. An attacker who can trigger a panic in the fTPM TA can reset the PCRs, and then extend them PCRs with whatever they choose, falsifying boot measurements, accessing sealed data, and potentially more. The impact of this issue depends significantly on the behavior of affected TAs. For some, it could manifest as a denial of service, while for others, like the fTPM TA, it can result in the disclosure of sensitive data. Anyone running the fTPM TA is affected, but similar attacks may be possible on other TAs that leverage the Secure Storage API. A fix is available in commit 941a58d78c99c4754fbd4ec3079ec9e1d596af8f. | ||||
| CVE-2025-42904 | 1 Sap | 1 Application Server Java | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| Due to an Information Disclosure vulnerability in Application Server ABAP, an authenticated attacker could read unmasked values displayed in ABAP Lists. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized disclosure of data, resulting in a high impact on confidentiality without affecting integrity or availability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-46738 | 1 Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories | 1 Sel-5033 Acselerator Rtac Software | 2026-04-15 | 6.6 Medium |
| An authenticated attacker can maliciously modify layout data files in the SEL-5033 installation directory to execute arbitrary code. | ||||
| CVE-2025-46739 | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High | ||
| An unauthenticated user could discover account credentials via a brute-force attack without rate limiting | ||||
| CVE-2025-46740 | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| An authenticated user without user administrative permissions could change the administrator Account Name. | ||||
| CVE-2025-46741 | 2026-04-15 | 5.7 Medium | ||
| A suspended or recently logged-out user could continue to interact with Blueframe until the time-out period occurred. | ||||