Export limit exceeded: 47177 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (47177 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-45415 | 1 Zte | 10 Zxhn E1600 Firmware, Zxhn E2603 Firmware, Zxhn E2615 Firmware and 7 more | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| The HTTPD binary in multiple ZTE routers has a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in check_data_integrity function. This function is responsible for validating the checksum of data in post request. The checksum is sent encrypted in the request, the function decrypts it and stores the checksum on the stack without validating it. An unauthenticated attacker can get RCE as root by exploiting this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45414 | 1 Zte | 10 Zxhn E1600 Firmware, Zxhn E2603 Firmware, Zxhn E2615 Firmware and 7 more | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| The HTTPD binary in multiple ZTE routers has a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in webPrivateDecrypt function. This function is responsible for decrypting RSA encrypted ciphertext, the encrypted data is supplied base64 encoded. The decoded ciphertext is stored on the stack without checking its length. An unauthenticated attacker can get RCE as root by exploiting this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45413 | 1 Zte | 10 Zxhn E1600 Firmware, Zxhn E2603 Firmware, Zxhn E2615 Firmware and 7 more | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High |
| The HTTPD binary in multiple ZTE routers has a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in rsa_decrypt function. This function is an API wrapper for LUA to decrypt RSA encrypted ciphertext, the decrypted data is stored on the stack without checking its length. An authenticated attacker can get RCE as root by exploiting this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2024-43663 | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| There are many buffer overflow vulnerabilities present in several CGI binaries of the charging station.This issue affects Iocharger firmware for AC model chargers beforeversion 24120701. Likelihood: High – Given the prevalence of these buffer overflows, and the clear error message of the web server, an attacker is very likely to be able to find these vulnerabilities. Impact: Low – Usually, overflowing one of these buffers just causes a segmentation fault of the CGI binary, which causes the web server to return a 502 Bad Gateway error. However the webserver itself is not affected, and no DoS can be achieved. Abusing these buffer overflows in a meaningful way requires highly technical knowledge, especially since ASLR also seems to be enabled on the charging station. However, a skilled attacker might be able to use one of these buffer overflows to obtain remote code execution. CVSS clarification. The attack can be executed over any network connection the station is listening to and serves the web interface (AV:N), and there are no additional security measure sin place that need to be circumvented (AC:L), the attack does not rely on preconditions (AT:N). The attack does require authentication, but the level of authentication is irrelevant (PR:L), it does not require user interaction (UI:N). The attack has a small impact on the availability of the device (VC:N/VI:N/VA:L). There is no impact on subsequent systems. (SC:N/SI:N/SA:N). While this device is an EV charger handing significant amounts of power, we do not expect this vulnerability to have a safety impact. The attack can be automated (AU:Y). | ||||
| CVE-2024-43661 | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| The <redacted>.so library, which is used by <redacted>, is vulnerable to a buffer overflow in the code that handles the deletion of certificates. This buffer overflow can be triggered by providing a long file path to the <redacted> action of the <redacted>.exe CGI binary or to the <redacted>.sh CGI script. This binary or script will write this file path to <redacted>, which is then read by <redacted>.so This issue affects Iocharger firmware for AC models before version 24120701. Likelihood: Moderate – An attacker will have to find this exploit by either obtaining the binaries involved in this vulnerability, or by trial and error. Furthermore, the attacker will need a (low privilege) account to gain access to the <redacted>.exe CGI binary or <redacted>.sh script to trigger the vulnerability, or convince a user with such access send an HTTP request that triggers it. Impact: High – The <redacted> process, which we assume is responsible for OCPP communication, will keep crashing after performing the exploit. This happens because the buffer overflow causes the process to segfault before <redacted> is removed. This means that, even though <redacted> is automatically restarted, it will crash again as soon as it tries to parse the text file. CVSS clarification. The attack can be executed over any network connection the station is listening to and serves the web interface (AV:N), and there are no additional security measure sin place that need to be circumvented (AC:L), the attack does not rely on preconditions (AT:N). The attack does require authentication, but the level of authentication is irrelevant (PR:L), it does not require user interaction (UI:N). The attack leads to reducred availability of the device (VC:N/VI:N/VA:H). THere is not impact on subsequent systems. (SC:N/SI:N/SA:N). Alltough this device is an EV charger handing significant amounts of power, we do not forsee a safety impact. The attack can be automated (AU:Y). Because the DoS condition is written to disk persistantly, it cannot be recovered by the user (R:I). | ||||
| CVE-2024-43659 | 2026-04-15 | 7.2 High | ||
| After gaining access to the firmware of a charging station, a file at <redacted> can be accessed to obtain default credentials that are the same across all Iocharger AC model EV chargers. This issue affects Iocharger firmware for AC models before firmware version 25010801. The issue is addressed by requiring a mandatory password change on first login, it is still recommended to change the password on older models. Likelihood: Moderate – The attacker will first have to abuse a code execution or file inclusion vulnerability (for example by using <redacted>.sh) to gain access to the <redacted>.json file, or obtain a firmware dump of the charging station or obtain the firmware via other channels. Impact: Critical – All chargers using Iocharger firmware for AC models started with the same initial password. For models with firmware version before 25010801 a password change was not mandatory. It is therefore very likely that this firmware password is still active on many chargers. These credentials could, once obtained, allow an attacker to log into many Iocharger charging station, and allow them to execute arbitrary commands via the System → Custom page. CVSS clarification: Any network interface serving the web ui is vulnerable (AV:N) and there are not additional security measures to circumvent (AC:L), nor does the attack require and existing preconditions (AT:N). The attack is authenticated, and requires high privileges (PR:H), there is no user interaction required (UI:N). The attack leads to a compromised of the confidentialy of the "super user" credentials of the device (VC:H/VI:N/VA:N), and can subsequently be used to full compromise and other devices (SC:H/SI:H/SA:H). Becuase this is an EV charger handing significant power, there is a potential safety impact (S:P). This attack can be automated (AU:Y). | ||||
| CVE-2024-54015 | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIPROTEC 5 6MD84 (CP300) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 6MD85 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 6MD86 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 6MD89 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 6MD89 (CP300) V9.6x (All versions < V9.68), SIPROTEC 5 6MU85 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7KE85 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SA82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SA86 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SA87 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SD82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SD86 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SD87 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ81 (CP150) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ85 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ86 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SK82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SK85 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SL82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SL86 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SL87 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SS85 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7ST85 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7ST85 (CP300) V9.6x (All versions < V9.68), SIPROTEC 5 7ST86 (CP300) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7ST86 (CP300) V9.8x (All versions < V9.83), SIPROTEC 5 7SX82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SX85 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SY82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7UM85 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7UT82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7UT85 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7UT86 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7UT87 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7VE85 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7VK87 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7VU85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BA-2EL (Rev.2) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BA-2EL (Rev.2) V9.6 (All versions < V9.68), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BA-2EL (Rev.2) V9.8 (All versions < V9.83), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BB-2FO (Rev. 2) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BB-2FO (Rev. 2) V9.6 (All versions < V9.68), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BB-2FO (Rev. 2) V9.8 (All versions < V9.83), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BD-2FO (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BD-2FO V9.6 (All versions < V9.68), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BD-2FO V9.8 (All versions < V9.83), SIPROTEC 5 Compact 7SX800 (CP050) (All versions >= V9.50 < V9.90). Affected devices do not properly validate SNMP GET requests. This could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to retrieve sensitive information of the affected devices with SNMPv2 GET requests using default credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2024-5477 | 1 Hp | 1 Hp | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A potential security vulnerability has been identified in the System BIOS for some HP PC products which may allow escalation of privilege, arbitrary code execution, denial of service, or information disclosure via a physical attack that requires specialized equipment and knowledge. HP is releasing firmware mitigation for the potential vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2024-42643 | 1 Smartdns Project | 1 Smartdns | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| Integer Overflow in fast_ping.c in SmartDNS Release46 allows remote attackers to cause a Denial of Service via misaligned memory access. | ||||
| CVE-2024-42011 | 1 Spotify | 1 Spotify App | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| The Spotify app 8.9.58 for iOS has a buffer overflow in its use of strcat. | ||||
| CVE-2024-41995 | 1 Ricoh Company Ltd | 1 Javatm Platform | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| Initialization of a resource with an insecure default vulnerability exists in JavaTM Platform Ver.12.89 and earlier. If this vulnerability is exploited, the product may be affected by some known TLS1.0 and TLS1.1 vulnerabilities. As for the specific products/models/versions of MFPs and printers that contain JavaTM Platform, see the information provided by the vendor. | ||||
| CVE-2024-41981 | 1 Siemens | 1 Simcenter Nastran | 2026-04-15 | 7.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Simcenter Femap V2306 (All versions), Simcenter Femap V2401 (All versions), Simcenter Femap V2406 (All versions). The affected application is vulnerable to heap-based buffer overflow while parsing specially crafted BDF files. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2024-41975 | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| An unauthenticated remote attacker can gain limited information of the PLC network but the user management of the PLCs prevents the actual access to the PLCs. | ||||
| CVE-2024-41928 | 1 Freebsd | 1 Freebsd | 2026-04-15 | 8.4 High |
| Malicious software running in a guest VM can exploit the buffer overflow to achieve code execution on the host in the bhyve userspace process, which typically runs as root. Note that bhyve runs in a Capsicum sandbox, so malicious code is constrained by the capabilities available to the bhyve process. | ||||
| CVE-2024-41908 | 1 Siemens | 6 Nx 1957 Firmware, Nx 1961 Firmware, Nx 1965 Firmware and 3 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in NX (All versions < V2406.3000). The affected applications contains an out of bounds read vulnerability while parsing specially crafted PRT files. This could allow an attacker to crash the application or execute code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2024-57509 | 2026-04-15 | 7.8 High | ||
| Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Bento4 mp42avc v.3bdc891602d19789b8e8626e4a3e613a937b4d35 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the AP4_File::ParseStream and related functions. | ||||
| CVE-2024-57510 | 2026-04-15 | 7.8 High | ||
| Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Bento4 mp42avc v.3bdc891602d19789b8e8626e4a3e613a937b4d35 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the AP4_MemoryByteStream::WritePartial. | ||||
| CVE-2024-57513 | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| A floating-point exception (FPE) vulnerability exists in the AP4_TfraAtom::AP4_TfraAtom function in Bento4. | ||||
| CVE-2024-41184 | 2 Acassen, Redhat | 3 Keepalived, Ceph Storage, Enterprise Linux | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| In the vrrp_ipsets_handler handler (fglobal_parser.c) of keepalived through 2.3.1, an integer overflow can occur. NOTE: this CVE Record might not be worthwhile because an empty ipset name must be configured by the user. | ||||
| CVE-2024-57708 | 2026-04-15 | 5.7 Medium | ||
| An issue in OneTrust SDK v.6.33.0 allows a local attacker to cause a denial of service via the Object.setPrototypeOf, __proto__, and Object.assign components. NOTE: this is disputed by the Supplier who does not agree it is a prototype pollution vulnerability. | ||||