Export limit exceeded: 401176 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 401176 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (401176 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-63567 | 2026-10-02 | N/A | ||
| Observable discrepancy in IesEngine.DecryptBlock in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. bc-csharp before 2.7.0 allows a remote attacker who has captured an IES or ECIES ciphertext, and who can submit modified ciphertexts for decryption under the same key pair, to recover its plaintext via a CBC padding-oracle attack, because in block-cipher mode the engine decrypts the ciphertext and removes its padding before verifying the MAC. A padding failure is therefore reported with a different error message, and without the MAC computation, compared with a MAC failure. Only applications that construct IesEngine directly with a padded block cipher, such as AES in CBC mode with PKCS#7 padding, are affected; stream-mode IES is not. | ||||
| CVE-2026-63566 | 2026-10-02 | N/A | ||
| Memory allocation with excessive size value in the DTLS handshake reassembly (DtlsReliableHandshake, DtlsReassembler) in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. bc-csharp before 2.7.0 allows a remote unauthenticated DTLS peer to cause a denial of service through memory exhaustion via crafted handshake message fragments, because the reassembly buffer for each incoming handshake message was allocated at the 24-bit length declared in the fragment header, without the check against the peer's maximum handshake message size that TLS already applied. A fragment carrying no payload can force an allocation of almost 16 MB, for each of up to 16 pending messages per handshake, before the handshake is authenticated. DTLS servers and DTLS clients are both affected; TLS is not. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59671 | 1 Repasat | 1 Repasat Application | 2026-10-02 | N/A |
| Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in the Repasat application. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to trick a user into executing arbitrary code in the victim’s browser. The endpoint “/es/datatables/getemployeetypesdatatable” is affected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59670 | 1 Repasat | 1 Repasat Application | 2026-10-02 | N/A |
| Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in the Repasat application. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to trick a user into executing arbitrary code in the victim’s browser. The “nomListaValidacion” parameter is affected – endpoint “/es/validationslists/assignList/Employee/45659”. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59669 | 1 Repasat | 1 Repasat Application | 2026-10-02 | N/A |
| Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in the Repasat application. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to trick a user into executing arbitrary code in the victim’s browser. The “name” parameter is affected – endpoint “/es/attachmenttypes/update/203336” | ||||
| CVE-2026-59664 | 1 Repasat | 1 Repasat Application | 2026-10-02 | N/A |
| Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in the Repasat application. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to trick a user into executing arbitrary code in the victim’s browser. The “nomServicioPrestado” parameter is affected – endpoint “/es/providedservices/store”. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59663 | 1 Repasat | 1 Repasat Application | 2026-10-02 | N/A |
| Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in the Repasat application. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to trick a user into executing arbitrary code in the victim’s browser. The “nomDelegacion” parameter is affected – endpoint “/es/delegations/store”. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59662 | 1 Repasat | 1 Repasat Application | 2026-10-02 | N/A |
| Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in the Repasat application. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to trick a user into executing arbitrary code in the victim’s browser. The “nomCompetidor” parameter is affected – endpoint “/es/competitors/store”. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18036 | 1 Legion Of The Bouncy Castle Inc. | 1 Bc-java | 2026-10-02 | N/A |
| In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, NTRU reduced secret values with the % operator in three helpers whose reference implementations are deliberately division-free, so each reduction was carried out by an integer division whose latency depends on the secret operand. Polynomial.modQ divided by a variable divisor, which a compiler cannot strength-reduce to a multiply the way it can a constant one, so it emitted a division on every call including on the decapsulation path where the dividend derives from the private key; Polynomial.mod3 and NTRUSampling.mod3 divided the secret key polynomials f and g during key generation, the message polynomials r and m during encapsulation, and coefficients recovered during decapsulation. An attacker able to measure that timing can recover information about the NTRU private key. modQ now masks, which is exact because q is always a power of two, and mod3 uses the reference implementation's division-free fold and select; the results are unchanged. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17507 | 1 Legion Of The Bouncy Castle Inc. | 1 Bc-java | 2026-10-02 | N/A |
| In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, the MLS implementation (org.bouncycastle.mls) holds RFC 9420's uint32 leaf_index in a signed int, so a wire value with the top bit set decodes to a negative number. That is a legitimate encoding rather than malformed input, and it must still decode, since the MLS interop test vectors round-trip the full range. GroupKeySet.SecretTree.hasLeaf and Group.validateRemove compared the decoded value directly against the tree's leaf count, and a signed comparison treats any negative int as less than a positive bound, so an out-of-range sender passed the membership check. In the hasLeaf case the SenderData of an unprotected PrivateMessage could then drive LeafIndex.directPath through NodeIndex.parent() arithmetic that never reaches the tree root, growing the resulting node list without bound until the JVM exhausted its heap. A single small message from any current group member could therefore deny service to every other member of the group. Both comparisons now interpret the value as unsigned via Integer.toUnsignedLong, rejecting an out-of-range sender however it was encoded; well-formed leaf indices are unaffected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16001 | 1 Legion Of The Bouncy Castle Inc. | 1 Bc-csharp | 2026-10-02 | N/A |
| Exposure of the message authentication key through the encryption keystream in the stream mode of IesEngine (an IesEngine constructed without a block cipher) in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. bc-csharp before 2.7.0 allows a remote attacker who has observed one encrypted message with known plaintext to forge shorter messages of their choosing that the recipient accepts as authentic, via a crafted ciphertext and MAC tag, because the MAC key was taken from the key derivation output directly after a keystream as long as the message, while the derivation input depends only on the static key pair and fixed parameters. The keystream revealed by that one message therefore contains the MAC key for every sufficiently shorter message. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16000 | 1 Legion Of The Bouncy Castle Inc. | 1 Bc-csharp | 2026-10-02 | N/A |
| Missing cryptographic step in the DSTU 7624 CCM mode implementation (KCcmBlockCipher) in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. bc-csharp before 2.7.0 allows an attacker who can observe encrypted messages of known or chosen content to forge ciphertexts with valid authentication tags, via messages encrypted without associated data. The cause is that the G1 block, which binds the nonce, the message length and the parameter flags into the CBC-MAC, was processed only when associated data was present. Without associated data the tag was a CBC-MAC of the plaintext alone, independent of the nonce. Only applications that use KCcmBlockCipher directly and supply no associated data are affected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15999 | 1 Legion Of The Bouncy Castle Inc. | 1 Bc-csharp | 2026-10-02 | N/A |
| Improper validation of integrity check value in the AES-CCM implementation (CcmParameters and CcmBlockCipher) in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. bc-csharp before 2.7.0 allows an on-path attacker to modify CCM-encrypted content without detection via an AlgorithmIdentifier whose CCMParameters declare an authentication tag (aes-ICVlen) of zero or another length outside the RFC 5084 set, because CcmParameters accepted any value and CcmBlockCipher validated the tag length only when encrypting, so decryption compared a zero-length or very short tag. Affected paths include ParameterUtilities.GetCipherParameters, used by CmsEnvelopedData and CmsEnvelopedDataParser for EnvelopedData encrypted with AES-CCM, and any caller passing an unchecked tag length to CcmBlockCipher for decryption. | ||||
| CVE-2026-104606 | 2 Itsourcecode, Sourcecodester | 2 Online Admission System Project, Online Admission System | 2026-10-02 | 6.3 Medium |
| A security flaw has been discovered in itsourcecode Online Admission System Project 1.0. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file confirm.php. The manipulation of the argument ID results in sql injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-104422 | 2 Zcashfoundation, Zfnd | 2 Zebra, Zebra | 2026-10-02 | 7.5 High |
| The block sync download path in Zebra (zebrad) before 6.3.0 reads a block's height from its unvalidated coinbase scriptSig and drops blocks that appear too far behind the tip before consensus validation, without penalizing the supplying peer. Because V5 transaction IDs exclude the scriptSig, a malicious peer can repeatedly serve a canonical block whose coinbase claims height 1 while keeping the requested hash, delaying the node's discovery of the newest block. | ||||
| CVE-2026-104418 | 1 Ghost | 1 Ghost | 2026-10-02 | 7.2 High |
| Ghost from 6.10.3 before 6.64.0 contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows authenticated administrators to run code by abusing theme translation file loading. Attackers with administrator access can upload a crafted theme containing malicious translation files to execute arbitrary code on the Ghost server. | ||||
| CVE-2026-104411 | 1 Ghost | 1 Ghost | 2026-10-02 | 7.3 High |
| Ghost from 6.22.1 before 6.64.0 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows staff users to host scripts by uploading files served with extension-derived content types on the default local storage adapter. Attackers can upload script-bearing files to the site's domain to compromise other staff users' admin sessions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-104410 | 2 B3log, Siyuan | 2 Siyuan, Siyuan | 2026-10-02 | 7.5 High |
| SiYuan before 3.8.5 contains an information disclosure vulnerability that allows publish readers to read password-protected and publish-disabled database rows via the /api/export/preview endpoint. Attackers can request an export preview of a public document embedding a database view to obtain protected rows' primary-key text and cell values. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103604 | 2026-10-02 | N/A | ||
| Inefficient algorithmic complexity in X.509 distinguished name string conversion (X509Name.ToString and IetfUtilities.ValueToString) in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. bc-csharp before 2.7.0 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to cause a denial of service through CPU exhaustion via a certificate, CRL, certification request or other structure whose name contains a long attribute value made up of characters that must be escaped, such as commas, or of leading or trailing spaces, because each escaping backslash was inserted into the buffer being scanned, so the work grew quadratically with the length of the value. Applications are exposed when they convert such a name to a string, for example to log or display it, or compare it with IetfUtilities.RdnAreEqual, as PKIX path validation does for directoryName name constraints. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103603 | 2026-10-02 | N/A | ||
| Memory allocation with excessive size value in the HSS/LMS signature code (HssPublicKeyParameters, HssSignature) in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. bc-csharp before 2.7.0 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker who can supply both an HSS public key and a signature to cause a denial of service through memory exhaustion via a public key encoding with an excessive level count, because the level count L read when parsing an HSS public key was not checked against the RFC 8554 maximum of 8, and signature parsing then allocated an array of L - 1 entries before reading any further signature data. A single verification can commit up to about 17 GB of memory or fail with an OutOfMemoryException. | ||||