Export limit exceeded: 399728 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (399728 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-94052 | 1 Apache | 1 Mina Sshd | 2026-09-30 | 9.1 Critical |
| A missing check in LdapPasswordAuthenticator in component sshd-ldap in Apache MINA SSHD versions 1.2.0 to 2.19.0 or 3.0.0-M1 to 3.0.0-M5 bypassed authentication checks. Apache MINA SSHD is a Java library for client-side and server-side SSH. The optional sshd-ldap component provides support for integrating password and publickey authentication on the server side with an LDAP server. sshd-ldap is an optional component. SSH servers implemented with Apache MINA SSHD are affected only if they use sshd-ldap and do configure an LdapPasswordAuthenticator to be used for password authentication. Normal password authentication via the built-in mechanisms in sshd-core is _not_ affected by this vulnerability, which concerns only LdapPasswordAuthenticator. Users are recommended to upgrade affected applications to version 2.20.0 or 3.0.0-M6, which fix this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94029 | 1 Apache | 1 Mina Sshd | 2026-09-30 | 6.5 Medium |
| Server-side memory exhaustion in Apache MINA SSHD 1.0.0 to 2.19.0 and 3.0.0-M1 to 3.0.0-M5, component sshd-sftp, in the SFTP v6 check-file-name/check-file-handle extension. Apache MINA SSHD is a Java library for client-side and server-side SSH. Using a very small "block size" (for instance 256, which is the minimum) on a huge file generates many (file size / block size) hashes. The resulting SFTP reply message was accumulated fully in memory server-side, which could, with a suitably large (possibly sparse) file exhaust the server-side memory, taking down the server. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.20.0 or 3.0.0-M6, which fix this issue by imposing a maximum limit on the size of the reply. Many SFTP implementations have a general limit on the size of SFTP messages anyway; typically 256kB as in OpenSSH or also in Apache MINA SSHD. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94002 | 2026-09-30 | 7.5 High | ||
| Possible memory exhaustion in SFTP clients (DefaultSftpClient) in component sshd-sftp in Apache MINA SSHD versions 0.9.0 to 2.19.0 and 3.0.0-M1 to 3.0.0-M5. Apache MINA SSHD is a Java library for client-side and server-side SSH. The sshd-sftp component provides support for SFTP. The SFTP client implementation, when receiving a reply, did not check that this reply corresponded to a request sent earlier. Unsolicited replies would be stored but never consumed. A malicious server could keep sending unsolicited replies until available memory in the client was exhausted. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.20.0 or 3.0.0-M6, which fix this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93994 | 2026-09-30 | 8.1 High | ||
| Apache MINA SSHD is a Java library for client-side and server-side SSH. SSH servers can be configured to require multi-authentication schemes, for instance two different public keys, not just one. In OpenSSH, this would be done by setting in sshd_config AuthenticationMethods "publickey,publickey". Apache MINA SSHD provides an equivalent configuration mechanism. In Apache MINA SSHD versions up to 2.19.0 and 3.0.0-M1 to 3.0.0-M5 the server code in component sshd-core does not enforce that the two public keys presented are different. A user can thus successfully authenticate with only one of the two key pairs required by presenting this single key twice. This is a partial authentication bypass. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.20.0 or 3.0.0-M6, which fix this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-77185 | 2026-09-30 | 9.1 Critical | ||
| Authentication bypass in sshd-core in Apache MINA SSHD versions 2.0.0 to 2.19.0 and 3.0.0-M1 to 3.0.0-M5 for a certain (presumed rare) way to implement an SSH server. Apache MINA SSHD is a Java library for client- and server-side SSH. In the server part of the library, a mechanism to perform "asynchronous authentication" exists. A server implemented with Apache MINA SSHD must contain explicit code to make use of this feature. The implementation of this feature was flawed and could potentially lead to skipping checking the signature in public-key or hostbased authentication, or returning a wrong result. Users are recommended to upgrade to Apache MINA SSHD 2.20.0 or 3.0.0-M6, which fix the logic error and which additionally forbid the use of this "asynchronous authentication" mechanism with the public-key or hostbased authentication schemes: if used, the SSH session will be closed and the server will log an entry indicating that asynchronous authentication may be used only with password or keyboard-interactive authentication. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15442 | 1 Wolfssl | 1 Wolfssl | 2026-09-30 | N/A |
| In all builds that make use of (D)TLS, including default builds, there is a series of conditional states during the TLS shutdown which could lead to a heap-use-after free. If an application ended up getting a partial wolfSSL_read() which is sometimes caused by a small user buffer passed in, then called wolfSSL_shutdown for a bidirectional close and attempted to wolfSSL_read() again while the peer continues trying to send data during the shutdown it would lead to a state where a potential heap-use-after free happened. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100749 | 1 Svenbluege.de | 1 Event Gallery For Joomla | 2026-09-30 | N/A |
| Joomla Extension - svenbluege.de - CSRF in backend cleanup actions in Event Gallery extension < 6.5.0 - Only orphaned file entries and shopping carts that are older than 30 days will be deleted. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100747 | 1 Svenbluege.de | 1 Event Gallery For Joomla | 2026-09-30 | N/A |
| Joomla Extension - svenbluege.de - CSRF in image upload in Event Gallery extension < 6.5.0 - Due to lack of an CSRF token check, a third-party site can upload files to an event and overwrite existing files with the same name. | ||||
| CVE-2026-67987 | 2026-09-30 | N/A | ||
| crmne/ruby_llm at commit fa6f279847d6d7027814539d9c0dfc3bbdfd2a83 contains polynomial-time regular expression denial-of-service conditions in think-tag response parsing on Ruby 3.1.x. A malicious or anomalous model response containing many unterminated <think> tags can cause excessive CPU consumption in two consecutive regular expressions and delay chat-completion processing | ||||
| CVE-2026-67993 | 2026-09-30 | N/A | ||
| basecamp/upright at commit efe4f2e5254ac6e57e45d2261804cca74dbbca3f contains a login cross-site request forgery issue in the static credentials callback. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79348 | 2026-09-30 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| KitchenAsty through 0.3.0 contains a broken object level authorization (IDOR) vulnerability in the reservations API. The endpoint GET /api/reservations/:id in packages/server applies the authenticate middleware but performs no ownership or role check, and the getReservation handler in packages/server/src/controllers/reservation.controller.ts returns the record retrieved by the client-supplied identifier without comparing reservation.customerId to the authenticated principal | ||||
| CVE-2026-95281 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-09-30 | 9.6 Critical |
| Buffer overflow in ANGLE in Google Chrome on on Android prior to 154.0.8037.57 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Critical) | ||||
| CVE-2026-102457 | 1 Digiwin | 1 Easyflow .net | 2026-09-30 | 6.5 Medium |
| EasyFlow .NET developed by Digiwin has an Arbitrary File Read vulnerability. Authenticated remote attackers can exploit this vulnerability to download arbitrary system files. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102458 | 1 Digiwin | 1 Easyflow .net | 2026-09-30 | 9.8 Critical |
| EasyFlow .NET developed by Digiwin has a Missing Authentication vulnerability. Unauthenticated remote attackers can obtain other users' plaintext passwords through a specific API. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102459 | 1 Digiwin | 1 Easyflow .net | 2026-09-30 | 6.1 Medium |
| EasyFlow .NET developed by Digiwin has a Reflected Cross-site Scripting vulnerability. Unauthenticated remote attackers can execute arbitrary JavaScript codes in user's browser through phishing attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102577 | 1 Moodle | 1 Moodle | 2026-09-30 | 4.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Moodle. Incorrect handling of IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses within the URL downloader's host-blocking logic allows an authenticated remote user to bypass blocked-host restrictions. By supplying a crafted URL, an attacker can induce the server to make requests to restricted destinations, leading to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). | ||||
| CVE-2026-102374 | 1 Gestsup | 1 Gestsup | 2026-09-30 | 6.1 Medium |
| GestSup versions before 3.2.62 contain a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the IMAP OAuth connector that double-decodes MIME-encoded email subjects after HTML escaping. Unauthenticated attackers can send crafted emails to monitored mailboxes with nested MIME encoded-words to inject JavaScript that executes in technician sessions when viewing tickets. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102373 | 1 Gestsup | 1 Gestsup | 2026-09-30 | 6.5 Medium |
| GestSup versions before 3.2.62 fail to validate ticket ownership when loading comments via the threadedit parameter in thread.php. Authenticated attackers can enumerate sequential comment IDs to read private comments from other users' tickets without proper authorization checks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-100389 | 1 Gestsup | 1 Gestsup | 2026-09-30 | 8.1 High |
| GestSup versions before 3.2.62 contain a remote code execution vulnerability in the basic IMAP connector's attachment handling that fails to skip blocked file extensions. Unauthenticated attackers can send emails with PHP attachments to monitored mailboxes, which are written to the web-accessible upload/ticket directory and executed when accessed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103114 | 1 Os4ed | 1 Opensis-classic | 2026-09-30 | 6.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was identified in OS4ED openSIS-Classic up to 9.3. The impacted element is the function DBQuery_assignment of the file modules/grades/Assignments.php of the component Assignment Management Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument Tables leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet. | ||||