Export limit exceeded: 376635 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (376635 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-59325 | 1 Cpsd | 1 Cryptopro Secure Disk | 2026-08-13 | N/A |
| CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk for Bitlocker before v7.7.4 fails to encrypt the initramfs contents, allowing for the offline recovery of secrets and cryptographic details. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16977 | 2026-08-13 | 8.1 High | ||
| The Form Maker by 10Web WordPress plugin before 1.15.45 does not properly parameterize a user-controlled value that is substituted into a dynamic SQL query built for a database-backed choice field, allowing subscriber-level users to perform second-order SQL injection. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18046 | 2026-08-13 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The Cookie Consent WordPress plugin before 0.0.10 does not correctly enforce its intended administrator-only capability check on the REST route that stores its geolocation service license key, so the route falls back to an authentication-only gate, allowing any authenticated user such as a subscriber to overwrite the stored key and disrupt the Cookie Consent WordPress plugin before 0.0.10's geolocation-based consent banner targeting. | ||||
| CVE-2026-70465 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlientwindows | 2026-08-13 | 7.3 High |
| A buffer copy without checking size of input ('classic buffer overflow') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiClientWindows 7.4.0 through 7.4.3, FortiClientWindows 7.2.0 through 7.2.11 may allow an unauthenticated attacker in a position to alter or craft DNS responses to the targeted host to execute arbitrary code via malicious packets. | ||||
| CVE-2026-71408 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortios | 2026-08-13 | 5 Medium |
| A allocation of resources without limits or throttling vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiOS 7.4 all versions, FortiOS 7.2 all versions may allow attacker to denial of service via <insert attack vector here> | ||||
| CVE-2026-70466 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortios, Fortiweb | 2026-08-13 | 4.8 Medium |
| A incomplete list of disallowed inputs vulnerability in Fortinet FortiWeb 8.0.0 through 8.0.2, FortiWeb 7.6.0 through 7.6.5, FortiWeb 7.4 all versions, FortiWeb 7.2 all versions, FortiWeb 7.0 all versions may allow attacker to improper access control via <insert attack vector here> | ||||
| CVE-2026-70468 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Fortimanager, Fortimanagercloud | 2026-08-13 | 7.3 High |
| A authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel vulnerability in Fortinet FortiManager 7.6.1, FortiManager 7.4.3 through 7.4.5, FortiManager 7.2.5 through 7.2.9, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.1, FortiManager Cloud 7.4.3 through 7.4.5, FortiManager Cloud 7.2.5 through 7.2.9 may allow attacker to improper access control via <insert attack vector here> | ||||
| CVE-2026-63514 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Sharepoint Enterprise Server 2016, Sharepoint Server, Sharepoint Server 2016 and 2 more | 2026-08-13 | 8.8 High |
| Deserialization of untrusted data in Microsoft Office SharePoint allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18634 | 2026-08-13 | 8.4 High | ||
| An insecure handling of serialized objects vulnerability was found in the one of the service of GMS application 9.5.1 (Build 9510.1044) and earlier versions. A local attacker with the ability to interact with the service could exploit this behavior to perform unauthorized actions through the affected component. | ||||
| CVE-2025-59321 | 2026-08-13 | N/A | ||
| CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk for Bitlocker before v7.7.4 contains a default TPM PCR policy that fails to consider the system boot state. This allows the TPM to be unsealed via an unintended execution path or from another hardware platform. | ||||
| CVE-2025-59324 | 2026-08-13 | N/A | ||
| CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk for Bitlocker before v7.7.4 fails to properly validate LUKS encryption and, if encryption is present, all CryptoPro file integrity checks are skipped. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12976 | 2 Learnpress, Wordpress | 2 Learnpress, Wordpress | 2026-08-13 | 6.5 Medium |
| The LearnPress WordPress plugin before 4.4.4 does not verify that a user is enrolled in a course before processing AI-assistant requests against that course's lesson content, allowing any authenticated user such as a subscriber to obtain material from paid courses they have not enrolled in. | ||||
| CVE-2026-14859 | 2026-08-13 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The WP Crowdfunding WordPress plugin before 2.2.1 does not check the campaign-submission capability in one of its AJAX actions, allowing any authenticated users such as Subscribers to create crowdfunding campaign posts despite not being granted that permission. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16051 | 2026-08-13 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| The wpmudev-updates WordPress plugin before 5.0.1 does not verify the integrity of the packages installed through its remote management interface, nor protect those requests against replay, allowing an attacker able to obtain or replay a valid signed management request to install and execute arbitrary code (remote code execution). | ||||
| CVE-2026-71407 | 1 Fortinet | 3 Fortios, Fortipam, Fortiproxy | 2026-08-13 | 5.1 Medium |
| A Stack-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability [CWE-121] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.6.1 through 7.6.6 may allow an unauthenticated attacker who can bypass stack protection and ASLR to execute arbitrary code or commands in the context of the WAD daemon via crafted sockets, only if the explicit proxy is configured with Kerberos authentication and SOCKS enabled. | ||||
| CVE-2026-26035 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiweb | 2026-08-13 | 8.8 High |
| An Improper Authentication vulnerability [CWE-287] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiWeb 8.0.0 through 8.0.2, FortiWeb 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiWeb 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiWeb 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, FortiWeb 7.0.0 through 7.0.12 may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to login into the Fortiweb GUI/CLI with a random username and password | ||||
| CVE-2026-48414 | 1 Adobe | 3 Adobe Commerce, Adobe Commerce B2b, Magento Open Source | 2026-08-13 | 7.7 High |
| Adobe Commerce is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field, potentially gaining elevated access or control over the victim's account or session. Exploit depends on conditions beyond the attacker's control. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-68758 | 1 Jfrog | 1 Artifactory | 2026-08-13 | 6.5 Medium |
| A low-privileged authenticated user may access restricted support information under specific conditions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-7210 | 1 Python | 2 Cpython, Python | 2026-08-13 | 7.5 High |
| `xml.parsers.expat` and `xml.etree.ElementTree` use insufficient entropy for Expat hash-flooding protection, which allows a crafted XML document to trigger hash flooding.\r\n\r\nFully mitigating this vulnerability requires both updating libexpat to 2.8.0 or later and applying this patch. | ||||
| CVE-2026-48791 | 1 Sigstore | 1 Sigstore-java | 2026-08-13 | 2 Low |
| sigstore-java is a sigstore java client for interacting with sigstore infrastructure. Version 2.0.0 erroneously removed verification of the integrated (Rekor entry) time) against the Fulcio certificate. Version 2.1.0 re-added this verification with enhancements that adhere to the Sigstore verification spec. The old sigstore-conformance test for this check was built incorrectly. This vulnerability impacts only users verifying bundles with `dev.sigstore:sigstore-java:2.0.0`. Older versions are not affected; it is fixed in `dev.sigstore:sigstore-java:2.1.0` A malicious actor may exploit this if they were able to access a users system and exfiltrate the temporary private key used during signing and then reuse an old fulcio certificate later without requiring direct access to the user's credentials. Users may protect themselves by re-verifying their artifacts using the newest sigstore-java or another current sigstore client. Transparency logs may also be audited for unauthorized signatures for a suspected reused identity. | ||||