Export limit exceeded: 403298 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 403298 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 403298 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 403298 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (403298 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-20328 | 2026-10-08 | 9.1 Critical | ||
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco License On-Prem, formerly Cisco Smart Software Manager On-Prem (SSM On-Prem), could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to gain unauthorized access to an affected application. This vulnerability is due to improper checks during the password reset process. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a malicious request to the web-based management interface. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to reset the password of an arbitrary account, including high-privileged administrative user accounts, possibly allowing the attacker to gain unauthorized access to the application as any user. | ||||
| CVE-2026-14521 | 1 Ibm | 4 Datapower Gateway 1050, Datapower Gateway 1060, Datapower Gateway 106cd and 1 more | 2026-10-08 | 4.9 Medium |
| IBM DataPower Gateway 10.5.0.0 through 10.5.0.22, 10.6.1 through 10.6.6, 10.6.0.0 through 10.6.0.10, and 11.0.0.0 through 11.0.0.2 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-106611 | 2026-10-08 | 7.1 High | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WPMU DEV Forminator forminator allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Forminator: from n/a through 1.57.3. | ||||
| CVE-2025-31980 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Bigfix Service Management | 2026-10-08 | 4.3 Medium |
| HCL BigFix Service Management is affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability, which could allow an attacker to inject unvalidated, malformed data into the application, enabling potential injection attacks or errors in downstream processing systems. | ||||
| CVE-2026-105891 | 2026-10-08 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in Liquid Web / StellarWP Event Tickets event-tickets allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Event Tickets: from n/a through 5.30.0.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-105888 | 2026-10-08 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in Liquid Web / StellarWP Event Tickets event-tickets allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Event Tickets: from n/a through 5.30.0.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-105079 | 2026-10-08 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in StylemixThemes MasterStudy LMS masterstudy-lms-learning-management-system allows Stored XSS.This issue affects MasterStudy LMS: from n/a through 3.7.52. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103885 | 1 Apache | 1 Directory Ldap Api | 2026-10-08 | 7.5 High |
| Asymmetric Resource Consumption vulnerability in Apache Directory LDAP API. A LDAP server using the LDAP API (like Apache DS) may consume 100% of a CPU core indefinitely when processing some badly crafted Telephone Numbers. This issue affects Apache Directory LDAP API: from 2.1.0 before 2.1.9. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.1.9, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103072 | 2026-10-08 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in VillaTheme VillaTheme Core villatheme-core allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects VillaTheme Core: from n/a through 1.0.5. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6170 | 2 Redhat, Xmlsoft | 15 Ai Inference Server, Cert Manager, Discovery and 12 more | 2026-10-08 | 2.5 Low |
| A flaw was found in the interactive shell of the xmllint command-line tool, used for parsing XML files. When a user inputs an overly long command, the program does not check the input size properly, which can cause it to crash. This issue might allow attackers to run harmful code in rare configurations without modern protections. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12423 | 2 Redhat, Theforeman | 5 Enterprise Linux, Satellite, Satellite Capsule and 2 more | 2026-10-08 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in Foreman. The Red Hat Satellite /unattended/provision API endpoint is vulnerable to an authentication bypass due to a semantic logic flaw in host_verifier.rb. The application verifies the database state of a provisioning token rather than its actual presence in the incoming HTTP request. Because a host actively undergoing provisioning has an unexpired token in the database, the server's valid_host_token? method evaluates to true, granting access to the kickstart template even if the requester provides no token at all in the URL. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12541 | 2 Redhat, Theforeman | 5 Enterprise Linux, Satellite, Satellite Capsule and 2 more | 2026-10-08 | 8.2 High |
| A flaw was found in Foreman. OS command injection vulnerabilities exist in the foreman-rake db:dump and db:import_dump tasks. The application fails to properly sanitize user-supplied input in the destination parameter (during backups) and the file parameter (during imports) before passing them to a Ruby system() call for execution. An attacker with permissions to execute foreman-rake (e.g., via a restricted sudo configuration) can append malicious shell commands to the provided file paths. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12540 | 2 Redhat, Theforeman | 5 Enterprise Linux, Satellite, Satellite Capsule and 2 more | 2026-10-08 | 8.2 High |
| A flaw was found in Foreman. A command injection vulnerability exists in the foreman-rake errors:fetch_log task. The request_id parameter is passed to an underlying system command (typically grep) without adequate shell neutralization. While the task is intended to fetch specific log entries, an attacker with sudo permissions to execute this rake task can inject shell metacharacters (such as ;, ", or |) to break out of the intended command and execute arbitrary code. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12544 | 2 Redhat, Theforeman | 5 Enterprise Linux, Satellite, Satellite Capsule and 2 more | 2026-10-08 | 7.7 High |
| A flaw was found in Foreman. The foreman-rake initialization logic in /usr/share/foreman/config/settings.rb contains a vulnerable code pattern where configuration data is processed through two distinct executable layers. This creates a multi-stage execution chain that allows for both Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI) and insecure deserialization. This vulnerability can lead to remote code execution, total infrastructure compromise and supply chain risk. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87670 | 1 Brocade | 1 Fabric Os | 2026-10-08 | N/A |
| An authorization logic vulnerability exists in the Brocade Fabric OS versions before 10.0.1 REST API gateway. The internal gate guarding restricted management endpoints relies exclusively on client-controlled HTTP headers. An authenticated user with any valid REST session can spoof these headers to gain unauthorized access to internal management endpoints. This allows low-privilege users to view sensitive chassis metadata, hardware memory patrolling state, and firmware integrity audit logs. | ||||
| CVE-2026-105195 | 2026-10-08 | 2.7 Low | ||
| The Booking Calendar WordPress plugin before 11.8.3 does not adequately restrict which options a lower-privileged user can load through one of its settings handlers, allowing users with the Editor role and above to disclose the values of arbitrary WordPress options, including core site configuration. | ||||
| CVE-2026-105197 | 2026-10-08 | 2.7 Low | ||
| The Appointment Booking Plugin WordPress plugin before 5.6.5 does not verify that a backend staff user is authorized to act on the specific record targeted for deletion, allowing an authenticated user with a record-scoped staff role to irreversibly delete any order, customer, or transaction on the site, including records belonging to other staff and outside their assigned scope. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86827 | 2026-10-08 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| The BackWPup WordPress plugin before 5.7.7 does not verify that a request to its cron-triggered backup execution handler actually originates from WordPress's internal scheduled-event dispatch, allowing unauthenticated attackers to force any existing backup job to run immediately, independent of its configured trigger type or schedule. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86828 | 2026-10-08 | 6.6 Medium | ||
| The BackWPup WordPress plugin before 5.7.7 does not properly restrict the destination path of files extracted during a backup restore when its fallback archive library is used, allowing high-privileged users to write files outside the intended restore directory, potentially leading to remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94244 | 2026-10-08 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The Wallet System for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 2.8.0 does not perform any capability check, and relies on a token any authenticated user can obtain from a front-end page, before generating a report containing every customer's wallet transaction history, allowing any authenticated user, such as a subscriber, to disclose all users' names, email addresses, roles, transaction amounts, payment methods and dates. | ||||