Export limit exceeded: 381945 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.

Search

Search Results (381945 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2021-26854 1 Microsoft 1 Exchange Server 2026-08-19 6.6 Medium
Microsoft Exchange Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
CVE-2021-26412 1 Microsoft 1 Exchange Server 2026-08-19 9.1 Critical
Microsoft Exchange Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
CVE-2021-24110 1 Microsoft 2 Hevc Video Extensions, High Efficiency Video Coding 2026-08-19 7.8 High
HEVC Video Extensions Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
CVE-2026-68148 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2026-08-19 7.8 High
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fscrypt: Add missing superblock check in find_or_insert_direct_key() The legacy 'fscrypt_direct_keys' table caches master keys that are used by v1 encryption policies that have FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_DIRECT_KEY. It's just a global table for all filesystems (since the keys can be provided by the legacy process-subscribed keyrings mechanism, which makes it difficult to reuse super_block::s_master_keys). The entries in it ('struct fscrypt_direct_key') do contain a super_block pointer, though, for passing to fscrypt_destroy_inline_crypt_key() when the last inode that references the key is evicted. However, when finding the fscrypt_direct_key for an inode, we weren't actually comparing the super_block pointer. As a result, inodes with different super_blocks could point to the same fscrypt_direct_key. That could extend the lifetime of a fscrypt_direct_key beyond the super_block it points to, causing a use-after-free later. Fix this by creating distinct fscrypt_direct_key structs for distinct super_block structs. Note that this problem doesn't exist in the v2 policy equivalent ("per-mode keys"), since the data structures there are per super_block.
CVE-2021-24107 1 Microsoft 19 Windows 10, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607 and 16 more 2026-08-19 5.5 Medium
Windows Event Tracing Information Disclosure Vulnerability
CVE-2021-24090 1 Microsoft 8 Windows 10, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 1909 and 5 more 2026-08-19 7.8 High
Windows Error Reporting Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
CVE-2021-24104 1 Microsoft 6 Sharepoint Enterprise Server, Sharepoint Foundation, Sharepoint Foundation 2013 and 3 more 2026-08-19 4.6 Medium
Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing Vulnerability
CVE-2021-1640 1 Microsoft 19 Windows 10, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607 and 16 more 2026-08-19 7.8 High
Windows Print Spooler Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
CVE-2021-24089 1 Microsoft 2 Hevc Video Extensions, High Efficiency Video Coding 2026-08-19 7.8 High
HEVC Video Extensions Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
CVE-2026-68147 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2026-08-19 7.8 High
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fscrypt: Avoid dynamic allocation in fscrypt_get_devices() When a blk_crypto_key starts being used or is evicted, fs/crypto/ calls fscrypt_get_devices() to get the filesystem's list of block devices, then iterates over them and calls blk_crypto_config_supported(), blk_crypto_start_using_key(), or blk_crypto_evict_key() on each one. Currently, the block device pointers are placed in a dynamically allocated array. This dynamic allocation is problematic because: - It can fail, especially at the fscrypt_destroy_inline_crypt_key() call site when it's invoked for inode eviction under direct reclaim. - fscrypt_destroy_inline_crypt_key() doesn't handle the failure. It just zeroizes and frees the blk_crypto_key without calling blk_crypto_evict_key(). That causes a use-after-free. For now, let's fix this in the straightforward and easily-backportable way by switching to an on-stack array. Currently the fscrypt multi-device functionality is used only by f2fs, which has a hardcoded limit of 8 block devices. An on-stack array works fine for that. (Of course, this solution won't scale up to large number of block devices. For that we'd need a different solution, like moving the block device iteration into the filesystem. Or in the case of btrfs, which will only support blk-crypto-fallback, we should make it just call blk-crypto-fallback directly, so the block devices won't be needed.)
CVE-2021-27083 1 Microsoft 1 Remote Development 2026-08-19 7.8 High
Remote Development Extension for Visual Studio Code Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
CVE-2021-27082 1 Microsoft 1 Quantum Development Kit 2026-08-19 7.8 High
Quantum Development Kit for Visual Studio Code Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
CVE-2021-27081 1 Microsoft 2 Eslint, Visual Studio Code Eslint Extension 2026-08-19 7.8 High
Visual Studio Code ESLint Extension Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
CVE-2021-27080 1 Microsoft 1 Azure Sphere 2026-08-19 9.3 Critical
Azure Sphere Unsigned Code Execution Vulnerability
CVE-2021-27077 1 Microsoft 19 Windows 10, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607 and 16 more 2026-08-19 7.8 High
Windows Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
CVE-2021-27075 1 Microsoft 6 Azure Container Instance, Azure Container Instances, Azure Container Registry and 3 more 2026-08-19 6.8 Medium
Azure Virtual Machine Information Disclosure Vulnerability
CVE-2026-68144 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2026-08-19 9.8 Critical
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: phonet: pep: fix use-after-free in pep_get_sb() pep_get_sb() doesn't consider that pskb_may_pull() might have relocated the skb data, and continue to access the older pointer, causing UAF. Reproduced under KASAN: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in pep_get_sb+0x234/0x3b0 Read of size 1 at addr ff11000105510f50 by task repro/157 pep_get_sb+0x234/0x3b0 pipe_handler_do_rcv+0x5f7/0xa10 pep_do_rcv+0x203/0x410 __sk_receive_skb+0x471/0x4a0 phonet_rcv+0x5b3/0x6c0 __netif_receive_skb+0xcc/0x1d0 Refetch the header with skb_header_pointer() after pskb_may_pull(), so the possibly stale pointer is no longer dereferenced. There are better ways to solve this, but, this is the less instrusive one.
CVE-2021-27074 1 Microsoft 1 Azure Sphere 2026-08-19 6.2 Medium
Azure Sphere Unsigned Code Execution Vulnerability
CVE-2021-27070 1 Microsoft 6 Windows 10, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 20h2 and 3 more 2026-08-19 7.3 High
Windows 10 Update Assistant Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability
CVE-2021-27060 1 Microsoft 1 Visual Studio Code 2026-08-19 7.8 High
Visual Studio Code Remote Code Execution Vulnerability