Export limit exceeded: 400202 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 400202 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (400202 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-102105 | 2026-09-30 | 9.1 Critical | ||
| Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). A server-side request forgery (SSRF) weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to induce the gateway to issue crafted requests to internal or otherwise unintended network destinations. The requests are triggered while the gateway renders message content that references external resources. Depending on the services reachable from the gateway, this could disclose sensitive internal information or trigger unintended actions on internal systems. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76111 | 1 Dell | 13 Powerstore 1000t, Powerstore 1200t, Powerstore 3000t and 10 more | 2026-09-30 | 8.8 High |
| Dell PowerStore contains an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability. An authenticated attacker with low privileges could potentially exploit this vulnerability to invoke administrator-only operations, leading to privilege escalation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102106 | 2026-09-30 | 9.1 Critical | ||
| Improper authentication in a Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway administrative service. An administrative service in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway did not consistently enforce administrator authentication, so the required password check could be bypassed. An attacker who referenced a valid administrator account could potentially create, modify, or delete internal users and managed domains and change their security-feature configuration without authenticating; deleting a managed domain also removes its user accounts and could lock administrators out of the gateway. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102107 | 2026-09-30 | 4.6 Medium | ||
| Kiteworks Core contains a business logic flaw in a Kiteworks file-request feature allowed an authenticated user to send a request that appeared to originate from another user, because the server did not verify that the requester was authorized to act as the specified account. This could be used to solicit files or information from a recipient under a trusted identity; exploitation requires the feature to be enabled for the attacker's profile and the targeted recipient to act on the request. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58575 | 1 Dell | 13 Powerstore 1000t, Powerstore 1200t, Powerstore 3000t and 10 more | 2026-09-30 | 8.8 High |
| Dell PowerStore contains an Authentication Bypass by Spoofing vulnerability. An authenticated attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to escalate privileges to Administrator. | ||||
| CVE-2024-58387 | 2026-09-30 | 7.5 High | ||
| Inspur Haiyue HCM Cloud contains an arbitrary file read vulnerability in the /api/model_report/file/download endpoint that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to read arbitrary files by supplying unvalidated path parameters index and ext. Attackers can craft requests such as /api/model_report/file/download?index=/&ext=<path> to traverse the filesystem and disclose sensitive files including /etc/passwd, application database files, and system configuration files. Exploitation evidence was first observed by the Shadowserver Foundation on 2024-11-04 . | ||||
| CVE-2026-102108 | 2026-09-30 | 7.2 High | ||
| An authenticated administrator of Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could submit a crafted serialized object to a cluster management interface that was deserialized without sufficient validation, potentially allowing arbitrary code execution in the context of the gateway service account. Exploitation requires an administrator account holding a specific queue-management privilege. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102109 | 2026-09-30 | 7.1 High | ||
| A SQL injection vulnerability existed in Kiteworks Secure Data Forms, where a value derived from the authenticated user's stored account data was incorporated into a database query without proper sanitization. An authenticated user could potentially influence that value to inject SQL. Exploitation requires an authenticated session and applies only to deployments where a specific optional feature is in use. | ||||
| CVE-2023-54402 | 2026-09-30 | 7.5 High | ||
| iDocView contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in its /doc/upload endpoint that allows remote unauthenticated attackers to fetch arbitrary URLs by supplying a hardcoded default token value (testtoken) to bypass authentication. Attackers can exploit the unrestricted URL scheme handling, including file:// URIs, to read arbitrary local files such as operating-system and application configuration files, and to reach internal network hosts and services not otherwise accessible. Exploitation evidence was first observed by the Shadowserver Foundation on 2024-03-26. | ||||
| CVE-2026-79683 | 1 Dell | 13 Powerstore 1000t, Powerstore 1200t, Powerstore 3000t and 10 more | 2026-09-30 | 8.8 High |
| Dell PowerStore contains a Protection Mechanism Failure vulnerability. An authenticated user with limited privileges could potentially exploit this vulnerability to write attacker-controlled content to arbitrary filesystem paths. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102110 | 2026-09-30 | 5.9 Medium | ||
| An endpoint used during initial appliance setup did not require authentication and did not correctly enforce its intended state precondition, so during the initial activation window an unauthenticated network attacker could repeatedly re-trigger the privileged activation process. This could disrupt setup and leave the appliance in an incompletely configured state. The issue is only reachable while an appliance is being activated for the first time and not yet fully configured. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102111 | 2026-09-30 | 4.9 Medium | ||
| Kiteworks did not enforce the maximum permitted value for a configurable security-policy setting. An authenticated administrator could set this value outside its intended range so that the associated control never activated, while the control continued to appear enabled in the administrative interface and audit log, allowing it to be silently rendered ineffective. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102112 | 2026-09-30 | 7.8 High | ||
| A privilege escalation vulnerability in Kiteworks could allow an attacker who has already obtained code execution as an unprivileged backend service account on the appliance to escalate to root and run arbitrary commands with the highest privileges. Exploitation requires existing local access to that service account. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102113 | 2026-09-30 | 7.8 High | ||
| A privilege escalation vulnerability in Kiteworks could allow an attacker who has already obtained code execution as an unprivileged backend service account on the appliance to escalate to root. A privileged routine did not safely handle a filesystem path that the lower-privileged account could influence, allowing the attacker to cause a root-owned operation to run arbitrary commands with the highest privileges. Exploitation requires existing local access to that service account. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102114 | 2026-09-30 | 7.2 High | ||
| A command injection vulnerability in Kiteworks could allow a high-privileged authenticated administrator to execute arbitrary operating-system commands as root on the affected appliance node. Successful exploitation requires an administrative account with elevated privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102115 | 2026-09-30 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| Kiteworks Core did not correctly validate a parameter submitted to the password reset workflow. An unauthenticated attacker who knew the email address of a user with a locally stored password could potentially reset that account's password without access to the emailed reset link and then authenticate as that user, including where the account holds administrative privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2026-102116 | 2026-09-30 | 7.2 High | ||
| -A weakness could have allowed an authenticated Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway administrator to write a file outside its intended location and cause the application to execute it, potentially resulting in remote code execution as the underlying service account. | ||||
| CVE-2026-95309 | 2 Apple, Google | 2 Iphone Os, Chrome | 2026-09-30 | 5.4 Medium |
| UI misrepresentation in Mobile in Google Chrome on on iOS prior to 154.0.8037.57 allowed a remote attacker to spoof UI elements via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) | ||||
| CVE-2026-102117 | 2026-09-30 | 7.2 High | ||
| On deployments where the remote-support capability is licensed and enabled, an authenticated System Administrator who also possessed the key protecting the submitted data could redirect the underlying system's outbound support connection to a destination of their choosing. That destination could then have operating-system commands executed on the node and receive their output, potentially resulting in remote code execution with the privileges of a local service account. | ||||
| CVE-2026-95308 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-09-30 | 3.4 Low |
| Integer overflow in Metrics in Google Chrome prior to 154.0.8037.57 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially read memory outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) | ||||