Export limit exceeded: 364053 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (364053 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-28805 | 1 Qnap | 5 Qss, Qsw-m2108-2c, Qsw-m2108-2s and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| Inclusion of sensitive information in the source code has been reported to affect certain QNAP switches running QSS. If exploited, this vulnerability allows attackers to read application data. This issue affects: QNAP Systems Inc. QSS versions prior to 1.0.3 build 20210505 on QSW-M2108-2C; versions prior to 1.0.3 build 20210505 on QSW-M2108-2S; versions prior to 1.0.3 build 20210505 on QSW-M2108R-2C; versions prior to 1.0.12 build 20210506 on QSW-M408. | ||||
| CVE-2021-28804 | 1 Qnap | 2 Qts, Quts Hero | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| A command injection vulnerabilities have been reported to affect QTS and QuTS hero. If exploited, this vulnerability allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands in a compromised application. This issue affects: QNAP Systems Inc. QTS versions prior to 4.5.1.1540 build 20210107. QNAP Systems Inc. QuTS hero versions prior to h4.5.1.1582 build 20210217. | ||||
| CVE-2021-28803 | 1 Qnap | 1 Q\'center | 2024-11-21 | 5.4 Medium |
| This issue affects: QNAP Systems Inc. Q'center versions prior to 1.11.1004. | ||||
| CVE-2021-28802 | 1 Qnap | 2 Qts, Quts Hero | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| A command injection vulnerabilities have been reported to affect QTS and QuTS hero. If exploited, this vulnerability allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands in a compromised application. This issue affects: QNAP Systems Inc. QTS versions prior to 4.5.1.1540 build 20210107. QNAP Systems Inc. QuTS hero versions prior to h4.5.1.1582 build 20210217. | ||||
| CVE-2021-28801 | 1 Qnap | 4 Qss, Qsw-m2108-2c, Qsw-m2108-2s and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 3.1 Low |
| An out-of-bounds read vulnerability has been reported to affect certain QNAP switches running QSS. If exploited, this vulnerability allows attackers to read sensitive information on the system. This issue affects: QNAP Systems Inc. QSS versions prior to 1.0.2 build 20210122 on QSW-M2108-2C; versions prior to 1.0.2 build 20210122 on QSW-M2108-2S; versions prior to 1.0.2 build 20210122 on QSW-M2108R-2C. | ||||
| CVE-2021-28800 | 1 Qnap | 1 Qts | 2024-11-21 | 8.1 High |
| A command injection vulnerability has been reported to affect QNAP NAS running legacy versions of QTS. If exploited, this vulnerability allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands in a compromised application. This issue affects: QNAP Systems Inc. QTS versions prior to 4.3.6.1663 Build 20210504; versions prior to 4.3.3.1624 Build 20210416. This issue does not affect: QNAP Systems Inc. QTS 4.5.3. QNAP Systems Inc. QuTS hero h4.5.3. QNAP Systems Inc. QuTScloud c4.5.5. | ||||
| CVE-2021-28798 | 1 Qnap | 2 Qts, Quts Hero | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
| A relative path traversal vulnerability has been reported to affect QNAP NAS running QTS and QuTS hero. If exploited, this vulnerability allows attackers to modify files that impact system integrity. QNAP have already fixed this vulnerability in the following versions: QTS 4.5.2.1630 Build 20210406 and later QTS 4.3.6.1663 Build 20210504 and later QTS 4.3.3.1624 Build 20210416 and later QuTS hero h4.5.2.1638 Build 20210414 and later QNAP NAS running QTS 4.5.3 are not affected. | ||||
| CVE-2021-28797 | 1 Qnap | 2 Nas, Surveillance Station | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability has been reported to affect QNAP NAS devices running Surveillance Station. If exploited, this vulnerability allows attackers to execute arbitrary code. QNAP have already fixed this vulnerability in the following versions: Surveillance Station 5.1.5.4.3 (and later) for ARM CPU NAS (64bit OS) and x86 CPU NAS (64bit OS) Surveillance Station 5.1.5.3.3 (and later) for ARM CPU NAS (32bit OS) and x86 CPU NAS (32bit OS) | ||||
| CVE-2021-28796 | 1 Increments | 1 Qiita\ | 2024-11-21 | 6.1 Medium |
| Increments Qiita::Markdown before 0.33.0 allows XSS in transformers. | ||||
| CVE-2021-28794 | 1 Shellcheck Project | 1 Shellcheck | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| The unofficial ShellCheck extension before 0.13.4 for Visual Studio Code mishandles shellcheck.executablePath. | ||||
| CVE-2021-28793 | 1 Lextudio | 1 Restructuredtext | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| vscode-restructuredtext before 146.0.0 contains an incorrect access control vulnerability, where a crafted project folder could execute arbitrary binaries via crafted workspace configuration. | ||||
| CVE-2021-28792 | 1 Swift Development Environment Project | 1 Swift Development Environment | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| The unofficial Swift Development Environment extension before 2.12.1 for Visual Studio Code allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by constructing a malicious workspace with a crafted sourcekit-lsp.serverPath, swift.languageServerPath, swift.path.sourcekite, swift.path.sourcekiteDockerMode, swift.path.swift_driver_bin, or swift.path.shell configuration value that triggers execution upon opening the workspace. | ||||
| CVE-2021-28791 | 1 Swiftformat Project | 1 Swiftformat | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| The unofficial SwiftFormat extension before 1.3.7 for Visual Studio Code allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by constructing a malicious workspace with a crafted swiftformat.path configuration value that triggers execution upon opening the workspace. | ||||
| CVE-2021-28790 | 1 Swiftlint Project | 1 Swiftlint | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| The unofficial SwiftLint extension before 1.4.5 for Visual Studio Code allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by constructing a malicious workspace with a crafted swiftlint.path configuration value that triggers execution upon opening the workspace. | ||||
| CVE-2021-28789 | 1 Apple-swift-format Project | 1 Apple-swift-format | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| The unofficial apple/swift-format extension before 1.1.2 for Visual Studio Code allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by constructing a malicious workspace with a crafted apple-swift-format.path configuration value that triggers execution upon opening the workspace. | ||||
| CVE-2021-28714 | 2 Debian, Linux | 2 Debian Linux, Linux Kernel | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| Guest can force Linux netback driver to hog large amounts of kernel memory T[his CNA information record relates to multiple CVEs; the text explains which aspects/vulnerabilities correspond to which CVE.] Incoming data packets for a guest in the Linux kernel's netback driver are buffered until the guest is ready to process them. There are some measures taken for avoiding to pile up too much data, but those can be bypassed by the guest: There is a timeout how long the client side of an interface can stop consuming new packets before it is assumed to have stalled, but this timeout is rather long (60 seconds by default). Using a UDP connection on a fast interface can easily accumulate gigabytes of data in that time. (CVE-2021-28715) The timeout could even never trigger if the guest manages to have only one free slot in its RX queue ring page and the next package would require more than one free slot, which may be the case when using GSO, XDP, or software hashing. (CVE-2021-28714) | ||||
| CVE-2021-28713 | 2 Debian, Xen | 2 Debian Linux, Xen | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| Rogue backends can cause DoS of guests via high frequency events T[his CNA information record relates to multiple CVEs; the text explains which aspects/vulnerabilities correspond to which CVE.] Xen offers the ability to run PV backends in regular unprivileged guests, typically referred to as "driver domains". Running PV backends in driver domains has one primary security advantage: if a driver domain gets compromised, it doesn't have the privileges to take over the system. However, a malicious driver domain could try to attack other guests via sending events at a high frequency leading to a Denial of Service in the guest due to trying to service interrupts for elongated amounts of time. There are three affected backends: * blkfront patch 1, CVE-2021-28711 * netfront patch 2, CVE-2021-28712 * hvc_xen (console) patch 3, CVE-2021-28713 | ||||
| CVE-2021-28712 | 2 Debian, Xen | 2 Debian Linux, Xen | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| Rogue backends can cause DoS of guests via high frequency events T[his CNA information record relates to multiple CVEs; the text explains which aspects/vulnerabilities correspond to which CVE.] Xen offers the ability to run PV backends in regular unprivileged guests, typically referred to as "driver domains". Running PV backends in driver domains has one primary security advantage: if a driver domain gets compromised, it doesn't have the privileges to take over the system. However, a malicious driver domain could try to attack other guests via sending events at a high frequency leading to a Denial of Service in the guest due to trying to service interrupts for elongated amounts of time. There are three affected backends: * blkfront patch 1, CVE-2021-28711 * netfront patch 2, CVE-2021-28712 * hvc_xen (console) patch 3, CVE-2021-28713 | ||||
| CVE-2021-28711 | 2 Debian, Xen | 2 Debian Linux, Xen | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| Rogue backends can cause DoS of guests via high frequency events T[his CNA information record relates to multiple CVEs; the text explains which aspects/vulnerabilities correspond to which CVE.] Xen offers the ability to run PV backends in regular unprivileged guests, typically referred to as "driver domains". Running PV backends in driver domains has one primary security advantage: if a driver domain gets compromised, it doesn't have the privileges to take over the system. However, a malicious driver domain could try to attack other guests via sending events at a high frequency leading to a Denial of Service in the guest due to trying to service interrupts for elongated amounts of time. There are three affected backends: * blkfront patch 1, CVE-2021-28711 * netfront patch 2, CVE-2021-28712 * hvc_xen (console) patch 3, CVE-2021-28713 | ||||
| CVE-2021-28710 | 2 Fedoraproject, Xen | 2 Fedora, Xen | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
| certain VT-d IOMMUs may not work in shared page table mode For efficiency reasons, address translation control structures (page tables) may (and, on suitable hardware, by default will) be shared between CPUs, for second-level translation (EPT), and IOMMUs. These page tables are presently set up to always be 4 levels deep. However, an IOMMU may require the use of just 3 page table levels. In such a configuration the lop level table needs to be stripped before inserting the root table's address into the hardware pagetable base register. When sharing page tables, Xen erroneously skipped this stripping. Consequently, the guest is able to write to leaf page table entries. | ||||