| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| MaxKB is an open-source AI assistant for enterprise. From version 2.0.0 through 2.9.2, a lowest-role workspace member denied access to a tool by WorkspaceUserResourcePermission can still bind its identifier through tool_ids, skill_tool_ids, or mcp_tool_ids and execute it through the agent or workflow dispatch path. The dispatch path does not reapply the per-tool grant enforced by dedicated tool routes, and tool execution decrypts server-side init_params, allowing the caller to receive credentials carried by the denied tool. No fixed version is available as of this review. |
| The Hydra Booking — Appointment Scheduling & Booking Calendar WordPress plugin before 1.2.2 does not verify that a booking belongs to the requesting user before modifying or deleting it on two of its booking endpoints, allowing a booking-provider-level user to cancel and permanently delete other providers' bookings on the same site. |
| The Hydra Booking — Appointment Scheduling & Booking Calendar WordPress plugin before 1.2.3 does not verify that the host record being modified belongs to the user making the request, allowing authenticated users holding a Hydra Booking — Appointment Scheduling & Booking Calendar WordPress plugin before 1.2.3-assigned host role to modify other hosts' profile data and reassign ownership of another host's record to themselves. |
| The Hydra Booking — Appointment Scheduling & Booking Calendar WordPress plugin before 1.2.4 does not perform object-level authorisation checks on several of its host-management operations, allowing users who hold its own administrator-assigned custom role to read, modify and permanently delete other hosts' records and the WordPress user accounts linked to them. |
| The Photo Gallery, Sliders, Proofing and WordPress plugin before 4.5.0 does not verify that the user saving a gallery owns it, allowing any user granted its gallery-management capability by an administrator to overwrite the stored settings of any gallery on the site, including its filesystem path, and including galleries belonging to other users. |
| The Photo Gallery, Sliders, Proofing and WordPress plugin before 4.5.0 does not verify that the requesting user is entitled to a given image record before returning it, allowing users with the Contributor role and above to read the stored metadata of any image on the site, including images in galleries belonging to other users. The disclosed data includes the image's stored EXIF subset, covering camera make and model and capture timestamp, along with internal checksums and identifiers that the Photo Gallery, Sliders, Proofing and WordPress plugin before 4.5.0's own capability-gated read path reserves to administrators. |
| The Photo Gallery, Sliders, Proofing and WordPress plugin before 4.5.0 does not verify that the user acting on an image owns the gallery it belongs to, allowing users granted its gallery-management capability by an administrator to delete, copy and re-tag any image on the site, including images in galleries belonging to other users. |
| The Photo Gallery, Sliders, Proofing and WordPress plugin before 4.5.0 does not check that a user holds its options capability before saving image sizing settings, allowing users granted only its gallery-management capability by an administrator to change settings that apply across the whole site. |
| The Directorist: AI-Powered Business Directory, Listings & Classified Ads WordPress plugin before 8.9.5 does not scope one of its REST collection endpoints to the requesting user, allowing users with a subscriber-level account to read every customer's order and payment records.
Versions 8.8.1 to 8.9 are not affected. The endpoint was scoped correctly in 8.8.1 and the unscoped behaviour was reintroduced in 8.9.1. |
| The Payment Plugins for PayPal WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 2.0.27 does not verify that a PayPal order supplied in a payment request belongs to the WooCommerce order being paid unless that PayPal order has already been completed, allowing unauthenticated attackers to have another buyer's approved but uncaptured payment captured against an order of their own. |
| The MasterStudy LMS WordPress Plugin WordPress plugin before 3.7.50 does not perform a per-object ownership check when returning a quiz attempt result, allowing any authenticated user with a minimal (subscriber) role to read other students' quiz grades, pass/fail status and attempt timestamps by referencing an attempt identifier belonging to another user. |
| The Directorist: AI-Powered Business Directory, Listings & Classified Ads WordPress plugin before 8.9.5 does not verify that the target user of a REST route matches the authenticated caller before reading and modifying that user's saved favorites, allowing any authenticated user with subscriber-level access to view and alter another user's favorites. |
| The Booking Manager WordPress plugin before 2.1.21 does not verify that a request to modify a user's Booking Manager WordPress plugin before 2.1.21-specific settings targets the requesting user's own account, allowing any authenticated user with subscriber-level access and above to create or overwrite the Booking Manager WordPress plugin before 2.1.21's per-user settings on arbitrary users, including administrators. |
| Capgo (Cap-go/capgo.app) server backend Supabase functions contain an incorrect authorization flaw in the API-key bundle promotion path. The PUT /bundle endpoint, available to "all" and "write" API keys, dispatches to setChannel, which authorizes with checkPermission(c, 'channel.promote_bundle', { appId: body.app_id }) and omits the request's channel_id. Because the omitted scope field is passed to rbac_check_permission_direct as SQL NULL, and channel-scope override evaluation is gated on p_channel_id IS NOT NULL, per-channel allow/deny overrides are never evaluated. A principal holding app-level channel.promote_bundle (granted by default to the app_developer and app_uploader roles) can therefore promote a bundle to a channel for which an explicit per-channel deny override exists, updating public.channels.version for the supplied channel_id; the target channel is only validated after authorization. The issue is confirmed on main at commit de66fa51e7ff2f50283cc1455c3d80ab3eb0ae43 and likely earlier versions; no patched version is known at the time of publication. |
| Capgo (capgo.app) is affected by an authorization flaw in the app icon update path. The PUT /app/:id endpoint accepts a user-controlled `icon` value, normalizes it, and stores it in public.apps.icon_url without verifying that the image path belongs to the target app's own image namespace (e.g. org/{owner_org}/{app_id}/...). Updating apps.icon_url fires the on_app_update trigger, whose worker reads record.icon_url and calls cleanStoredImageMetadata(), which runs with service-role credentials (supabaseAdmin()) and downloads and re-uploads the referenced storage object with upsert: true. As a result, an authenticated holder of an app-limited write API key can cause the privileged worker to rewrite an out-of-scope private image object (for example an organization logo) that the key cannot read or write directly under Supabase Storage RLS. All versions are affected; no patched version was available at the time of the advisory. |
| Capgo before 12.244.1 contains a cross-tenant integrity vulnerability in the metadata-cleaning worker that trusts image object keys from mutable database rows without validating ownership. An authenticated attacker can place a victim tenant's image key in a row they control, causing the service-role worker to download and re-upload that object with sanitized metadata. Attackers can silently modify metadata in cross-tenant image objects by supplying known victim keys during authorized row updates, bypassing storage access controls through the confused-deputy metadata worker. |
| Flowise through 3.1.4 exposes GET /api/v1/upsert-history/:id and PATCH /api/v1/upsert-history without route-level permission checks, and the backing service performs no workspace or ownership validation. getAllUpsertHistory() returns UpsertHistory rows selected solely by an attacker-supplied chatflowid, and patchDeleteUpsertHistory() deletes rows by an attacker-supplied array of record UUIDs. As a result, any authenticated low-privilege user or valid API key can read or delete document-store upsert history belonging to other users and other workspaces whenever the target chatflowId (which is exposed publicly in /chatbot/<chatflowId> share links) or row ids are known. The retrievable flowData and result fields contain embedding, record-manager and vector-store node configuration, including per-node paramValues. No patched version is available. |
| GitLab has remediated an issue in GitLab EE affecting all versions from 18.3 before 19.1.7, 19.2 before 19.2.5, and 19.3 before 19.3.1 that, under certain conditions, an authenticated user could have assigned compliance frameworks from namespaces they were not authorized to access to their own project, due to missing namespace validation on self-managed instances. |
| stoatchat before 0.15.5 fails to validate that MFA tickets belong to the authenticated user, allowing attackers to bypass MFA by using their own valid ticket with another user's session token. Attackers can obtain a ticket from their own account and use it with a victim's session token to disable TOTP, view recovery codes, or perform other sensitive operations without providing the victim's credentials. |
| OpenClaw (npm package 'openclaw') before 2026.7.1 incorrectly trusts requester provenance in message.action. In identity-bearing Gateway deployments (authentication modes that honor caller identity and narrower operator scopes), a write-scoped caller can supply another sender's identifier to the channel authorization checks and invoke a channel action under that spoofed requester identity, reaching operations the channel adapter would have denied to the real caller. Practical impact depends on the enabled channel, the action, and the target account's permissions. Shared-secret token and password callers are full trusted operators under OpenClaw's security model and are out of scope. The issue is fixed in 2026.7.1; as a workaround, restrict message.action to administrators and disable sensitive channel actions that rely on requester identity. |
