| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| An issue was discovered in Zammad before 6.3.0. An authenticated agent could perform a remote Denial of Service attack by calling an endpoint that accepts a generic method name, which was not properly sanitized against an allowlist. |
| An issue was discovered in Zammad before 6.3.0. The Zammad Upload Cache uses insecure, partially guessable FormIDs to identify content. An attacker could try to brute force them to upload malicious content to article drafts they have no access to. |
| In Zammad before 6.3.1, a Ruby gem bundled by Zammad is installed with world-writable file permissions. This allowed a local attacker on the server to modify the gem's files, injecting arbitrary code into Zammad processes (which run with the environment and permissions of the Zammad user). |
| Zammad before 6.4.1 places sensitive data (such as auth_microsoft_office365_credentials and application_secret) in log files. |
| In Zammad 6.4.x before 6.4.2, an authenticated agent with knowledge base permissions was able to use the Zammad API to fetch knowledge base content that they have no permission for. |
| In Zammad 6.4.x before 6.4.2, SSRF can occur. Authenticated admin users can enable webhooks in Zammad, which are triggered as POST requests when certain conditions are met. If a webhook endpoint returned a redirect response, Zammad would follow it automatically with another GET request. This could be abused by an attacker to cause GET requests for example in the local network. |
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE ID NUMBER. The Rejected CVE Record is a duplicate of CVE-2024-55890. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2024-55890 instead of this CVE Record. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE ID NUMBER. The Rejected CVE Record is a duplicate of CVE-2024-48057. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2024-48057 instead of this CVE Record. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE ID NUMBER. The Rejected CVE Record is a duplicate of CVE-2024-53981. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2024-53981 instead of this CVE Record. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE ID NUMBER. The Rejected CVE Record is a duplicate of CVE-2024-45595. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2024-45595 instead of this CVE Record. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE ID NUMBER. The Rejected CVE Record is a duplicate of CVE-2024-53981. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2024-53981 instead of this CVE Record. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE ID NUMBER. The Rejected CVE Record is a duplicate of CVE-2024-47874. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2024-47874 instead of this CVE Record. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE ID NUMBER. The Rejected CVE Record is a duplicate of CVE-2024-4940. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2024-4940 instead of this CVE Record. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE ID NUMBER. The Rejected CVE Record is a duplicate of CVE-2024-8966. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2024-8966 instead of this CVE Record. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE ID NUMBER. The Rejected CVE Record is a duplicate of CVE-2024-8939. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2024-8939 instead of this CVE Record. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| Freeing arbitrary <code>nsIInputStream</code>'s on a different thread than creation could have led to a use-after-free and potentially exploitable crash. This vulnerability affects Firefox ESR < 102.5, Thunderbird < 102.5, and Firefox < 107. |
| Through a series of popup and <code>window.print()</code> calls, an attacker can cause a window to go fullscreen without the user seeing the notification prompt, resulting in potential user confusion or spoofing attacks. This vulnerability affects Firefox ESR < 102.5, Thunderbird < 102.5, and Firefox < 107. |
| Service Workers should not be able to infer information about opaque cross-origin responses; but timing information for cross-origin media combined with Range requests might have allowed them to determine the presence or length of a media file. This vulnerability affects Firefox ESR < 102.5, Thunderbird < 102.5, and Firefox < 107. |
| Inhabit Systems Pty Ltd Move CRM version 4, build 260 was discovered to contain a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability via the User profile component. |
| Mozilla developers Ashley Hale and the Mozilla Fuzzing Team reported memory safety bugs present in Firefox 105 and Firefox ESR 102.3. Some of these bugs showed evidence of memory corruption and we presume that with enough effort some of these could have been exploited to run arbitrary code. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 106, Firefox ESR < 102.4, and Thunderbird < 102.4. |
