| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE ID NUMBER. The Rejected CVE Record is a duplicate of CVE-2024-55890. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2024-55890 instead of this CVE Record. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE ID NUMBER. The Rejected CVE Record is a duplicate of CVE-2024-48057. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2024-48057 instead of this CVE Record. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE ID NUMBER. The Rejected CVE Record is a duplicate of CVE-2024-53981. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2024-53981 instead of this CVE Record. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE ID NUMBER. The Rejected CVE Record is a duplicate of CVE-2024-45595. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2024-45595 instead of this CVE Record. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE ID NUMBER. The Rejected CVE Record is a duplicate of CVE-2024-53981. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2024-53981 instead of this CVE Record. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE ID NUMBER. The Rejected CVE Record is a duplicate of CVE-2024-47874. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2024-47874 instead of this CVE Record. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE ID NUMBER. The Rejected CVE Record is a duplicate of CVE-2024-4940. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2024-4940 instead of this CVE Record. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE ID NUMBER. The Rejected CVE Record is a duplicate of CVE-2024-8966. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2024-8966 instead of this CVE Record. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CVE ID NUMBER. The Rejected CVE Record is a duplicate of CVE-2024-8939. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2024-8939 instead of this CVE Record. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| Freeing arbitrary <code>nsIInputStream</code>'s on a different thread than creation could have led to a use-after-free and potentially exploitable crash. This vulnerability affects Firefox ESR < 102.5, Thunderbird < 102.5, and Firefox < 107. |
| Through a series of popup and <code>window.print()</code> calls, an attacker can cause a window to go fullscreen without the user seeing the notification prompt, resulting in potential user confusion or spoofing attacks. This vulnerability affects Firefox ESR < 102.5, Thunderbird < 102.5, and Firefox < 107. |
| Service Workers should not be able to infer information about opaque cross-origin responses; but timing information for cross-origin media combined with Range requests might have allowed them to determine the presence or length of a media file. This vulnerability affects Firefox ESR < 102.5, Thunderbird < 102.5, and Firefox < 107. |
| Inhabit Systems Pty Ltd Move CRM version 4, build 260 was discovered to contain a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability via the User profile component. |
| Mozilla developers Ashley Hale and the Mozilla Fuzzing Team reported memory safety bugs present in Firefox 105 and Firefox ESR 102.3. Some of these bugs showed evidence of memory corruption and we presume that with enough effort some of these could have been exploited to run arbitrary code. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 106, Firefox ESR < 102.4, and Thunderbird < 102.4. |
| Logins saved by Firefox should be managed by the Password Manager component which uses encryption to save files on-disk. Instead, the username (not password) was saved by the Form Manager to an unencrypted file on disk. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 106. |
| If two Workers were simultaneously initializing their CacheStorage, a data race could have occurred in the `ThirdPartyUtil` component. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 106. |
| If a website called `window.print()` in a particular way, it could cause a denial of service of the browser, which may persist beyond browser restart depending on the user's session restore settings. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 106, Firefox ESR < 102.4, and Thunderbird < 102.4. |
| Certain types of allocations were missing annotations that, if the Garbage Collector was in a specific state, could have lead to memory corruption and a potentially exploitable crash. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 106, Firefox ESR < 102.4, and Thunderbird < 102.4. |
| A same-origin policy violation could have allowed the theft of cross-origin URL entries, leaking the result of a redirect, via `performance.getEntries()`. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 106, Firefox ESR < 102.4, and Thunderbird < 102.4. |
| An issue discovered in Python Charmers Future 0.18.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted Set-Cookie header from malicious web server. |
