Export limit exceeded: 365292 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (365292 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-54133 | 2 Anysphere, Cursor | 2 Cursor, Cursor | 2025-08-25 | 9.6 Critical |
| Cursor is a code editor built for programming with AI. In versions 1.17 through 1.2, there is a UI information disclosure vulnerability in Cursor's MCP (Model Context Protocol) deeplink handler, allowing attackers to execute 2-click arbitrary system commands through social engineering attacks. When users click malicious `cursor://anysphere.cursor-deeplink/mcp/install` links, the installation dialog does not show the arguments being passed to the command being run. If a user clicks a malicious deeplink, then examines the installation dialog and clicks through, the full command including the arguments will be executed on the machine. This is fixed in version 1.3. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54136 | 2 Anysphere, Cursor | 2 Cursor, Cursor | 2025-08-25 | 7.2 High |
| Cursor is a code editor built for programming with AI. In versions 1.2.4 and below, attackers can achieve remote and persistent code execution by modifying an already trusted MCP configuration file inside a shared GitHub repository or editing the file locally on the target's machine. Once a collaborator accepts a harmless MCP, the attacker can silently swap it for a malicious command (e.g., calc.exe) without triggering any warning or re-prompt. If an attacker has write permissions on a user's active branches of a source repository that contains existing MCP servers the user has previously approved, or allows an attacker has arbitrary file-write locally, the attacker can achieve arbitrary code execution. This is fixed in version 1.3. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54130 | 2 Anysphere, Cursor | 2 Cursor, Cursor | 2025-08-25 | 7.5 High |
| Cursor is a code editor built for programming with AI. Cursor allows writing in-workspace files with no user approval in versions less than 1.3.9. If the file is a dotfile, editing it requires approval but creating a new one doesn't. Hence, if sensitive editor files, such as the .vscode/settings.json file don't already exist in the workspace, an attacker can chain a indirect prompt injection vulnerability to hijack the context to write to the settings file and trigger RCE on the victim without user approval. This is fixed in version 1.3.9. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54135 | 2 Anysphere, Cursor | 2 Cursor, Cursor | 2025-08-25 | 8.6 High |
| Cursor is a code editor built for programming with AI. Cursor allows writing in-workspace files with no user approval in versions below 1.3.9, If the file is a dotfile, editing it requires approval but creating a new one doesn't. Hence, if sensitive MCP files, such as the .cursor/mcp.json file don't already exist in the workspace, an attacker can chain a indirect prompt injection vulnerability to hijack the context to write to the settings file and trigger RCE on the victim without user approval. This is fixed in version 1.3.9. | ||||
| CVE-2025-55482 | 1 Tenda | 2 Ac6, Ac6 Firmware | 2025-08-25 | 7.5 High |
| Tenda AC6 V15.03.06.23_multi is vulnerable to Buffer Overflow in the formSetCfm function. | ||||
| CVE-2025-55498 | 1 Tenda | 2 Ac6, Ac6 Firmware | 2025-08-25 | 7.5 High |
| Tenda AC6 V15.03.06.23_multi was discovered to contain a buffer overflow via the time parameter in the fromSetSysTime function. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27392 | 1 Siemens | 2 Scalance Lpe9403, Scalance Lpe9403 Firmware | 2025-08-25 | 7.2 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SCALANCE LPE9403 (6GK5998-3GS00-2AC2) (All versions < V4.0). Affected devices do not properly sanitize user input when creating new VXLAN configurations. This could allow an authenticated highly-privileged remote attacker to execute arbitrary code on the device. | ||||
| CVE-2025-2092 | 1 Checkmk | 1 Checkmk | 2025-08-25 | 7.5 High |
| Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log File in Checkmk GmbH's Checkmk versions <2.3.0p29, <2.2.0p41 and <=2.1.0p49 (EOL) causes remote site authentication secrets to be written to log files accessible to administrators. | ||||
| CVE-2025-2596 | 1 Checkmk | 1 Checkmk | 2025-08-25 | 5.3 Medium |
| Session logout could be overwritten in Checkmk GmbH's Checkmk versions <2.3.0p30, <2.2.0p41, and 2.1.0p49 (EOL) | ||||
| CVE-2025-25297 | 1 Humansignal | 1 Label Studio | 2025-08-25 | 8.6 High |
| Label Studio is an open source data labeling tool. Prior to version 1.16.0, Label Studio's S3 storage integration feature contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in its endpoint configuration. When creating an S3 storage connection, the application allows users to specify a custom S3 endpoint URL via the s3_endpoint parameter. This endpoint URL is passed directly to the boto3 AWS SDK without proper validation or restrictions on the protocol or destination. The vulnerability allows an attacker to make the application send HTTP requests to arbitrary internal services by specifying them as the S3 endpoint. When the storage sync operation is triggered, the application attempts to make S3 API calls to the specified endpoint, effectively making HTTP requests to the target service and returning the response in error messages. This SSRF vulnerability enables attackers to bypass network segmentation and access internal services that should not be accessible from the external network. The vulnerability is particularly severe because error messages from failed requests contain the full response body, allowing data exfiltration from internal services. Version 1.16.0 contains a patch for the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-25296 | 1 Humansignal | 1 Label Studio | 2025-08-25 | 6.1 Medium |
| Label Studio is an open source data labeling tool. Prior to version 1.16.0, Label Studio's `/projects/upload-example` endpoint allows injection of arbitrary HTML through a `GET` request with an appropriately crafted `label_config` query parameter. By crafting a specially formatted XML label config with inline task data containing malicious HTML/JavaScript, an attacker can achieve Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). While the application has a Content Security Policy (CSP), it is only set in report-only mode, making it ineffective at preventing script execution. The vulnerability exists because the upload-example endpoint renders user-provided HTML content without proper sanitization on a GET request. This allows attackers to inject and execute arbitrary JavaScript in victims' browsers by getting them to visit a maliciously crafted URL. This is considered vulnerable because it enables attackers to execute JavaScript in victims' contexts, potentially allowing theft of sensitive data, session hijacking, or other malicious actions. Version 1.16.0 contains a patch for the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-25020 | 1 Ibm | 2 Cloud Pak For Security, Qradar Suite | 2025-08-24 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM QRadar Suite Software 1.10.12.0 through 1.11.2.0 and IBM Cloud Pak for Security 1.10.0.0 through 1.10.11.0 could allow an authenticated user to cause a denial of service due to improperly validating API data input. | ||||
| CVE-2025-25019 | 1 Ibm | 2 Cloud Pak For Security, Qradar Suite | 2025-08-24 | 4.8 Medium |
| IBM QRadar Suite Software 1.10.12.0 through 1.11.2.0 and IBM Cloud Pak for Security 1.10.0.0 through 1.10.11.0 does not invalidate session after a logout which could allow a user to impersonate another user on the system. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1334 | 1 Ibm | 2 Cloud Pak For Security, Qradar Suite | 2025-08-24 | 4 Medium |
| IBM QRadar Suite Software 1.10.12.0 through 1.11.2.0 and IBM Cloud Pak for Security 1.10.0.0 through 1.10.11.0 allows web pages to be stored locally which can be read by another user on the system. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45655 | 1 Ibm | 1 Application Gateway | 2025-08-24 | 5.5 Medium |
| IBM Application Gateway 19.12 through 24.09 could allow a local privileged user to perform unauthorized actions due to incorrect permissions assignment. | ||||
| CVE-2024-22330 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Verify Governance | 2025-08-24 | 5.9 Medium |
| IBM Security Verify Governance 10.0.2 does not require that users should have strong passwords by default, which makes it easier for attackers to compromise user accounts. | ||||
| CVE-2024-56343 | 1 Ibm | 2 Security Verify Access, Verify Identity Access Digital Credentials | 2025-08-24 | 4.3 Medium |
| IBM Verify Identity Access Digital Credentials 24.06 could allow an authenticated user to crash the service with a specially crafted POST request. | ||||
| CVE-2024-56342 | 1 Ibm | 2 Security Verify Access, Verify Identity Access Digital Credentials | 2025-08-24 | 4.3 Medium |
| IBM Verify Identity Access Digital Credentials 24.06 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information when a detailed technical error message is returned in the browser. This information could be used in further attacks against the system. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0923 | 1 Ibm | 1 Cognos Analytics | 2025-08-24 | 5.3 Medium |
| IBM Cognos Analytics 11.2.0, 11.2.1, 11.2.2, 11.2.3, 11.2.4, 12.0.0, 12.0.1, 12.0.2, 12.0.3, and 12.0.4 stores source code on the web server that could aid in further attacks against the system. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0917 | 1 Ibm | 1 Cognos Analytics | 2025-08-24 | 5.5 Medium |
| IBM Cognos Analytics 11.2.0, 11.2.1, 11.2.2, 11.2.3, 11.2.4, 12.0.0, 12.0.1, 12.0.2, 12.0.3, and 12.0.4 is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows a privileged user to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. | ||||