Export limit exceeded: 372692 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (29948 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2005-0038 | 1 Powerdns | 1 Powerdns | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| The DNS implementation of PowerDNS 2.9.16 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a compressed DNS packet with a label length byte with an incorrect offset, which could trigger an infinite loop. | ||||
| CVE-2005-0039 | 1 Nissc | 1 Ipsec | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Certain configurations of IPsec, when using Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP) in tunnel mode, integrity protection at a higher layer, or Authentication Header (AH), allow remote attackers to decrypt IPSec communications by modifying the outer packet in ways that cause plaintext data from the inner packet to be returned in ICMP messages, as demonstrated using bit-flipping attacks and (1) Destination Address Rewriting, (2) a modified header length that causes portions of the packet to be interpreted as IP Options, or (3) a modified protocol field and source address. | ||||
| CVE-2005-0043 | 1 Apple | 1 Itunes | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in Apple iTunes 4.7 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long URL in (1) .m3u or (2) .pls playlist files. | ||||
| CVE-2005-0045 | 1 Microsoft | 4 Windows 2000, Windows 2003 Server, Windows Nt and 1 more | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| The Server Message Block (SMB) implementation for Windows NT 4.0, 2000, XP, and Server 2003 does not properly validate certain SMB packets, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via Transaction responses containing (1) Trans or (2) Trans2 commands, aka the "Server Message Block Vulnerability," and as demonstrated using Trans2 FIND_FIRST2 responses with large file name length fields. | ||||
| CVE-2005-0047 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Windows 2000, Windows 2003 Server, Windows Xp | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Windows 2000, XP, and Server 2003 does not properly "validate the use of memory regions" for COM structured storage files, which allows attackers to execute arbitrary code, aka the "COM Structured Storage Vulnerability." | ||||
| CVE-2005-0049 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Sharepoint Portal Server, Sharepoint Team Services | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Windows SharePoint Services and SharePoint Team Services for Windows Server 2003 does not properly validate an HTTP redirection query, which allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTML and web script via a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack, or to spoof the web cache. | ||||
| CVE-2005-0051 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Windows Xp | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| The Server service (srvsvc.dll) in Windows XP SP1 and SP2 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information (users who are accessing resources) via an anonymous logon using a named pipe, which is not properly authenticated, aka the "Named Pipe Vulnerability." | ||||
| CVE-2005-0054 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Ie, Internet Explorer | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Internet Explorer 5.01, 5.5, and 6 allows remote attackers to spoof a less restrictive security zone and execute arbitrary code via an HTML page containing URLs that contain hostnames that have been double hex encoded, which are decoded twice to generate a malicious hostname, aka the "URL Decoding Zone Spoofing Vulnerability." | ||||
| CVE-2005-0055 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Ie, Internet Explorer | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Internet Explorer 5.01, 5.5, and 6 does not properly validate buffers when handling certain DHTML methods including the createControlRange Javascript function, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code, aka the "DHTML Method Heap Memory Corruption Vulnerability." | ||||
| CVE-2005-0056 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Ie, Internet Explorer | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Internet Explorer 5.01, 5.5, and 6 does not properly validate certain URLs in Channel Definition Format (CDF) files, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information or execute arbitrary code, aka the "Channel Definition Format (CDF) Cross Domain Vulnerability." | ||||
| CVE-2005-0053 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Ie, Internet Explorer, Windows 2000 and 5 more | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Internet Explorer 5.01, 5.5, and 6 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via drag and drop events, aka the "Drag-and-Drop Vulnerability." | ||||
| CVE-2005-0064 | 2 Redhat, Xpdf | 2 Enterprise Linux, Xpdf | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in the Decrypt::makeFileKey2 function in Decrypt.cc for xpdf 3.00 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a PDF file with a large /Encrypt /Length keyLength value. | ||||
| CVE-2005-0140 | 1 Peid | 1 Peid | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in PeID allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via a PE file with an Import Address Table containing a long import library name. | ||||
| CVE-2005-0058 | 1 Microsoft | 6 Windows 2000, Windows 2003 Server, Windows 98 and 3 more | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in the Telephony Application Programming Interface (TAPI) for Microsoft Windows 98, Windows 98 SE, Windows ME, Windows 2000, Windows XP, and Windows Server 2003 allows attackers to elevate privileges or execute arbitrary code via a crafted message. | ||||
| CVE-2005-0059 | 1 Microsoft | 4 Windows 2000, Windows 98, Windows 98se and 1 more | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in the Message Queuing component of Microsoft Windows 2000 and Windows XP SP1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted message. | ||||
| CVE-2005-0060 | 1 Microsoft | 6 Windows 2000, Windows 2003 Server, Windows 98 and 3 more | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in the font processing component of Microsoft Windows 2000, Windows XP SP1 and SP2, and Windows Server 2003 allows local users to gain privileges via a specially-designed application. | ||||
| CVE-2005-0061 | 1 Microsoft | 6 Windows 2000, Windows 2003 Server, Windows 98 and 3 more | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| The kernel of Microsoft Windows 2000, Windows XP SP1 and SP2, and Windows Server 2003 allows local users to gain privileges via certain access requests. | ||||
| CVE-2005-0065 | 1 Tcp | 1 Tcp | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| The original design of TCP does not check that the TCP sequence number in an ICMP error message is within the range of sequence numbers for data that has been sent but not acknowledged (aka "TCP sequence number checking"), which makes it easier for attackers to forge ICMP error messages for specific TCP connections and cause a denial of service, as demonstrated using (1) blind connection-reset attacks with forged "Destination Unreachable" messages, (2) blind throughput-reduction attacks with forged "Source Quench" messages, or (3) blind throughput-reduction attacks with forged ICMP messages that cause the Path MTU to be reduced. NOTE: CVE-2004-0790, CVE-2004-0791, and CVE-2004-1060 have been SPLIT based on different attacks; CVE-2005-0065, CVE-2005-0066, CVE-2005-0067, and CVE-2005-0068 are related identifiers that are SPLIT based on the underlying vulnerability. While CVE normally SPLITs based on vulnerability, the attack-based identifiers exist due to the variety and number of affected implementations and solutions that address the attacks instead of the underlying vulnerabilities. | ||||
| CVE-2005-0066 | 1 Tcp | 1 Tcp | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| The original design of TCP does not check that the TCP Acknowledgement number in an ICMP error message generated by an intermediate router is within the range of possible values for data that has already been acknowledged (aka "TCP acknowledgement number checking"), which makes it easier for attackers to forge ICMP error messages for specific TCP connections and cause a denial of service, as demonstrated using (1) blind connection-reset attacks with forged "Destination Unreachable" messages, (2) blind throughput-reduction attacks with forged "Source Quench" messages, or (3) blind throughput-reduction attacks with forged ICMP messages that cause the Path MTU to be reduced. NOTE: CVE-2004-0790, CVE-2004-0791, and CVE-2004-1060 have been SPLIT based on different attacks; CVE-2005-0065, CVE-2005-0066, CVE-2005-0067, and CVE-2005-0068 are related identifiers that are SPLIT based on the underlying vulnerability. While CVE normally SPLITs based on vulnerability, the attack-based identifiers exist due to the variety and number of affected implementations and solutions that address the attacks instead of the underlying vulnerabilities. | ||||
| CVE-2005-0067 | 1 Tcp | 1 Tcp | 2026-04-16 | N/A |
| The original design of TCP does not require that port numbers be assigned randomly (aka "Port randomization"), which makes it easier for attackers to forge ICMP error messages for specific TCP connections and cause a denial of service, as demonstrated using (1) blind connection-reset attacks with forged "Destination Unreachable" messages, (2) blind throughput-reduction attacks with forged "Source Quench" messages, or (3) blind throughput-reduction attacks with forged ICMP messages that cause the Path MTU to be reduced. NOTE: CVE-2004-0790, CVE-2004-0791, and CVE-2004-1060 have been SPLIT based on different attacks; CVE-2005-0065, CVE-2005-0066, CVE-2005-0067, and CVE-2005-0068 are related identifiers that are SPLIT based on the underlying vulnerability. While CVE normally SPLITs based on vulnerability, the attack-based identifiers exist due to the variety and number of affected implementations and solutions that address the attacks instead of the underlying vulnerabilities. | ||||