Search

Search Results (364122 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2025-13473 1 Djangoproject 1 Django 2026-02-04 5.3 Medium
An issue was discovered in 6.0 before 6.0.2, 5.2 before 5.2.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.28. The `django.contrib.auth.handlers.modwsgi.check_password()` function for authentication via `mod_wsgi` allows remote attackers to enumerate users via a timing attack. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Stackered for reporting this issue.
CVE-2025-14550 1 Djangoproject 1 Django 2026-02-04 7.5 High
An issue was discovered in 6.0 before 6.0.2, 5.2 before 5.2.11, and 4.2 before 4.2.28. `ASGIRequest` allows a remote attacker to cause a potential denial-of-service via a crafted request with multiple duplicate headers. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Jiyong Yang for reporting this issue.
CVE-2025-54160 1 Synology 2 Beedrive, Beedrive For Desktop 2026-02-04 7.8 High
Improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in BeeDrive in Synology BeeDrive for desktop before 1.4.2-13960 allows local users to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.
CVE-2025-54159 1 Synology 2 Beedrive, Beedrive For Desktop 2026-02-04 7.5 High
Missing authorization vulnerability in BeeDrive in Synology BeeDrive for desktop before 1.4.2-13960 allows remote attackers to delete arbitrary files via unspecified vectors.
CVE-2025-8074 1 Synology 2 Beedrive, Beedrive For Desktop 2026-02-04 5.6 Medium
Origin validation error vulnerability in BeeDrive in Synology BeeDrive for desktop before 1.4.3-13973 allows local users to write arbitrary files with non-sensitive information via unspecified vectors.
CVE-2019-19006 1 Sangoma 1 Freepbx 2026-02-04 9.8 Critical
Sangoma FreePBX 115.0.16.26 and below, 14.0.13.11 and below, 13.0.197.13 and below have Incorrect Access Control.
CVE-2025-62610 1 Hono 1 Hono 2026-02-04 8.1 High
Hono is a Web application framework that provides support for any JavaScript runtime. In versions from 1.1.0 to before 4.10.2, Hono’s JWT Auth Middleware does not provide a built-in aud (Audience) verification option, which can cause confused-deputy / token-mix-up issues: an API may accept a valid token that was issued for a different audience (e.g., another service) when multiple services share the same issuer/keys. This can lead to unintended cross-service access. Hono’s docs list verification options for iss/nbf/iat/exp only, with no aud support; RFC 7519 requires that when an aud claim is present, tokens MUST be rejected unless the processing party identifies itself in that claim. This issue has been patched in version 4.10.2.
CVE-2021-39935 1 Gitlab 1 Gitlab 2026-02-04 6.8 Medium
An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions starting from 10.5 before 14.3.6, all versions starting from 14.4 before 14.4.4, all versions starting from 14.5 before 14.5.2. Unauthorized external users could perform Server Side Requests via the CI Lint API
CVE-2025-50537 2 Eslint, Openjsf 2 Eslint, Eslint 2026-02-04 5.5 Medium
Stack overflow vulnerability in eslint before 9.26.0 when serializing objects with circular references in eslint/lib/shared/serialization.js. The exploit is triggered via the RuleTester.run() method, which validates test cases and checks for duplicates. During validation, the internal function checkDuplicateTestCase() is called, which in turn uses the isSerializable() function for serialization checks. When a circular reference object is passed in, isSerializable() enters infinite recursion, ultimately causing a stack overflow.
CVE-2025-48780 1 Scshr 1 Hr Portal 2026-02-04 9.8 Critical
A deserialization of untrusted data vulnerability in the download file function of Soar Cloud HRD Human Resource Management System through version 7.3.2025.0408 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary system commands via a crafted serialized object.
CVE-2025-48781 1 Scshr 1 Hr Portal 2026-02-04 7.5 High
An external control of file name or path vulnerability in the download file function of Soar Cloud HRD Human Resource Management System through version 7.3.2025.0408 allows remote attackers to obtain partial files by specifying arbitrary file paths.
CVE-2025-48782 1 Scshr 1 Hr Portal 2026-02-04 9.8 Critical
An unrestricted upload of file with dangerous type vulnerability in the upload file function of Soar Cloud HRD Human Resource Management System through version 7.3.2025.0408 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary system commands via a malicious file.
CVE-2025-48783 1 Scshr 1 Hr Portal 2026-02-04 7.5 High
An external control of file name or path vulnerability in the delete file function of Soar Cloud HRD Human Resource Management System through version 7.3.2025.0408 allows remote attackers to delete partial files by specifying arbitrary file paths.
CVE-2025-48784 1 Scshr 1 Hr Portal 2026-02-04 7.5 High
A missing authorization vulnerability in Soar Cloud HRD Human Resource Management System through version 7.3.2025.0408 allows remote attackers to modify system settings without prior authorization.
CVE-2025-5192 1 Scshr 1 Hr Portal 2026-02-04 7.5 High
A missing authentication for critical function vulnerability in the client application of Soar Cloud HRD Human Resource Management System through version 7.3.2025.0408 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication and access application functions.
CVE-2024-45326 1 Fortinet 1 Fortideceptor 2026-02-04 3.9 Low
An Improper Access Control vulnerability [CWE-284] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiDeceptor 6.0.0, FortiDeceptor 5.3 all versions, FortiDeceptor 5.2 all versions, FortiDeceptor 5.1 all versions, FortiDeceptor 5.0 all versions may allow an authenticated attacker with none privileges to perform operations on the central management appliance via crafted requests.
CVE-2024-35280 1 Fortinet 1 Fortideceptor 2026-02-04 5.1 Medium
A improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiDeceptor 5.3.0, FortiDeceptor 5.2.0, FortiDeceptor 5.1 all versions, FortiDeceptor 5.0 all versions, FortiDeceptor 4.3 all versions, FortiDeceptor 4.2 all versions, FortiDeceptor 4.1 all versions, FortiDeceptor 4.0 all versions, FortiDeceptor 3.3 all versions, FortiDeceptor 3.2 all versions, FortiDeceptor 3.1 all versions, FortiDeceptor 3.0 all versions may allow an attacker to perform a reflected cross-site scripting attack in the recovery endpoints
CVE-2026-24602 2 Raptive, Wordpress 2 Raptive Ads, Wordpress 2026-02-04 N/A
This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. This is a false positive. According to the vendor, the function identified as a vulnerability is intentional and part of the expected design.
CVE-2023-53636 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2026-02-03 7.8 High
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: clk: microchip: fix potential UAF in auxdev release callback Similar to commit 1c11289b34ab ("peci: cpu: Fix use-after-free in adev_release()"), the auxiliary device is not torn down in the correct order. If auxiliary_device_add() fails, the release callback will be called twice, resulting in a UAF. Due to timing, the auxdev code in this driver "took inspiration" from the aforementioned commit, and thus its bugs too! Moving auxiliary_device_uninit() to the unregister callback instead avoids the issue.
CVE-2023-53637 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2026-02-03 5.5 Medium
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: media: i2c: ov772x: Fix memleak in ov772x_probe() A memory leak was reported when testing ov772x with bpf mock device: AssertionError: unreferenced object 0xffff888109afa7a8 (size 8): comm "python3", pid 279, jiffies 4294805921 (age 20.681s) hex dump (first 8 bytes): 80 22 88 15 81 88 ff ff ."...... backtrace: [<000000009990b438>] __kmalloc_node+0x44/0x1b0 [<000000009e32f7d7>] kvmalloc_node+0x34/0x180 [<00000000faf48134>] v4l2_ctrl_handler_init_class+0x11d/0x180 [videodev] [<00000000da376937>] ov772x_probe+0x1c3/0x68c [ov772x] [<000000003f0d225e>] i2c_device_probe+0x28d/0x680 [<00000000e0b6db89>] really_probe+0x17c/0x3f0 [<000000001b19fcee>] __driver_probe_device+0xe3/0x170 [<0000000048370519>] driver_probe_device+0x49/0x120 [<000000005ead07a0>] __device_attach_driver+0xf7/0x150 [<0000000043f452b8>] bus_for_each_drv+0x114/0x180 [<00000000358e5596>] __device_attach+0x1e5/0x2d0 [<0000000043f83c5d>] bus_probe_device+0x126/0x140 [<00000000ee0f3046>] device_add+0x810/0x1130 [<00000000e0278184>] i2c_new_client_device+0x359/0x4f0 [<0000000070baf34f>] of_i2c_register_device+0xf1/0x110 [<00000000a9f2159d>] of_i2c_notify+0x100/0x160 unreferenced object 0xffff888119825c00 (size 256): comm "python3", pid 279, jiffies 4294805921 (age 20.681s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 b4 a5 17 81 88 ff ff 00 5e 82 19 81 88 ff ff .........^...... 10 5c 82 19 81 88 ff ff 10 5c 82 19 81 88 ff ff .\.......\...... backtrace: [<000000009990b438>] __kmalloc_node+0x44/0x1b0 [<000000009e32f7d7>] kvmalloc_node+0x34/0x180 [<0000000073d88e0b>] v4l2_ctrl_new.cold+0x19b/0x86f [videodev] [<00000000b1f576fb>] v4l2_ctrl_new_std+0x16f/0x210 [videodev] [<00000000caf7ac99>] ov772x_probe+0x1fa/0x68c [ov772x] [<000000003f0d225e>] i2c_device_probe+0x28d/0x680 [<00000000e0b6db89>] really_probe+0x17c/0x3f0 [<000000001b19fcee>] __driver_probe_device+0xe3/0x170 [<0000000048370519>] driver_probe_device+0x49/0x120 [<000000005ead07a0>] __device_attach_driver+0xf7/0x150 [<0000000043f452b8>] bus_for_each_drv+0x114/0x180 [<00000000358e5596>] __device_attach+0x1e5/0x2d0 [<0000000043f83c5d>] bus_probe_device+0x126/0x140 [<00000000ee0f3046>] device_add+0x810/0x1130 [<00000000e0278184>] i2c_new_client_device+0x359/0x4f0 [<0000000070baf34f>] of_i2c_register_device+0xf1/0x110 The reason is that if priv->hdl.error is set, ov772x_probe() jumps to the error_mutex_destroy without doing v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(), and all resources allocated in v4l2_ctrl_handler_init() and v4l2_ctrl_new_std() are leaked.