| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| SQL injection vulnerability in Infoticketing. This vulnerability allows
an unauthenticated attacker to retrieve, create, update, and delete the
database by sending a POST request using the 'code' parameter in '/components/cart/cartApplyDiscount.php'. |
| Stored XSS vulnerability in Creativeitem Sociopro due to lack of proper validation of user inputs via the endpoint '/sociopro/profile/update_profile', affecting to 'name' parameter via POST. This vulnerability could allow a remote user to send a specially crafted query to an authenticated user and steal his/her cookie session details. |
| Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in PideTuCita. This vulnerability allows an attacker to execute JavaScript code in the victim's browser by sending him/her a malicious URL using the endpoint 'cookies/indes.php/<XSS>'. This vulnerability can be exploited to steal confidential user data, such as session cookies or to perform actions on behalf of the user. |
| Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in WorkDo's TicketGo, consisting of a lack of proper validation of user input by sending a POST request to ‘/ticketgo-saas/home’, using the ‘description’ parameter. |
| Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in WorkDo's eCommerceGo SaaS, consisting of a stored XSS due to a lack of proper validation of user input by sending a POST request to ‘/ticket/x/conversion’, using the ‘reply_description’ parameter. |
| Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in WorkDo's eCommerceGo SaaS, consisting of a lack of proper validation of user input by sending a POST request to ‘/store-ticket’, using the ‘subject’ and ‘description’ parameters. |
| SQL injection vulnerability in SCATI Vision Web of SCATI Labs from version 4.8 to 7.2. This vulnerability allows an attacker to exfiltrate some data from the database via the ‘login’ parameter in the endpoint ‘/scatevision_web/index.php/loginForm’. |
| Registry Access Management (RAM) is a security feature allowing administrators to restrict access for their developers to only allowed registries. When a MacOS configuration profile is used to enforce organization sign-in, the RAM policies are not being applied, which would allow Docker Desktop users to pull down unapproved, and potentially malicious images from any registry. |
| Cpanel::JSON::XS before version 4.40 for Perl has an integer buffer overflow causing a segfault when parsing crafted JSON, enabling denial-of-service attacks or other unspecified impact |
| Starch versions 0.14 and earlier generate session ids insecurely.
The default session id generator returns a SHA-1 hash seeded with a counter, the epoch time, the built-in rand function, the PID, and internal Perl reference addresses. The PID will come from a small set of numbers, and the epoch time may be guessed, if it is not leaked from the HTTP Date header. The built-in rand function is unsuitable for cryptographic usage.
Predicable session ids could allow an attacker to gain access to systems. |
| Authen::DigestMD5 versions 0.01 through 0.02 for Perl generate the cnonce insecurely.
The cnonce (client nonce) is generated from an MD5 hash of the PID, the epoch time and the built-in rand function. The PID will come from a small set of numbers, and the epoch time may be guessed, if it is not leaked from the HTTP Date header. The built-in rand function is unsuitable for cryptographic usage.
According to RFC 2831, "The cnonce-value is an opaque quoted string value provided by the client and used by both client and server to avoid chosen plaintext attacks, and to provide mutual authentication. The security of the implementation depends on a good choice. It is RECOMMENDED that it contain at least 64 bits of entropy." |
| Mojolicious::Plugin::CaptchaPNG version 1.05 for Perl uses a weak random number source for generating the captcha.
That version uses the built-in rand() function for generating the captcha text as well as image noise, which is insecure. |
| Mojolicious::Plugin::CSRF 1.03 for Perl uses a weak random number source for generating CSRF tokens.
That version of the module generates tokens as an MD5 of the process id, the current time, and a single call to the built-in rand() function. |
| Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in WorkDo's HRMGo, consisting of a lack of proper validation of user input by sending a POST request to ‘/hrmgo/ticket/changereply’, using the ‘description’ parameter. |
| CryptX for Perl before version 0.065 contains a dependency that may be susceptible to malformed unicode.
CryptX embeds the tomcrypt library. The versions of that library in CryptX before 0.065 may be susceptible to CVE-2019-17362. |
| Net::Dropbear versions through 0.16 for Perl contains a dependency that may be susceptible to an integer overflow.
Net::Dropbear embeds a version of the libtommath library that is susceptible to an integer overflow associated with CVE-2023-36328. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC Virtualization as a Service (SIVaaS) (All versions). The affected application exposes a network share without any authentication. This could allow an attacker to access or alter sensitive data without proper authorization. |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/sysfb: Do not dereference NULL pointer in plane reset
The plane state in __drm_gem_reset_shadow_plane() can be NULL. Do not
deref that pointer, but forward NULL to the other plane-reset helpers.
Clears plane->state to NULL.
v2:
- fix typo in commit description (Javier) |
| Improper Restriction of XML External Entity Reference in various Lexmark printer drivers for Windows allows attacker to disclose sensitive information to an arbitrary URL. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIPROTEC 5 6MD84 (CP300) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 6MD85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 6MD86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 6MD89 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 6MU85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7KE85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SA82 (CP150) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SA86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SA87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SD82 (CP150) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SD86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SD87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ81 (CP150) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ82 (CP150) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SK82 (CP150) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SK85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SL82 (CP150) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SL86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SL87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SS85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7ST85 (CP300) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7ST86 (CP300) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SX82 (CP150) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SX85 (CP300) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SY82 (CP150) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7UM85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7UT82 (CP150) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7UT85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7UT86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7UT87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7VE85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7VK87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7VU85 (CP300) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 Compact 7SX800 (CP050) (All versions < V10.0). Affected devices do not properly limit the bandwidth for incoming network packets over their local USB port. This could allow an attacker with physical access to send specially crafted packets with high bandwidth to the affected devices thus forcing them to exhaust their memory and stop responding to any network traffic via the local USB port. Affected devices reset themselves automatically after a successful attack. The protection function is not affected of this vulnerability. |
