Export limit exceeded: 403696 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (403696 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-107394 | 1 Indico | 1 Indico | 2026-10-08 | 6.8 Medium |
| Indico is an event management system that uses Flask-Multipass, a multi-backend authentication system for Flask. Prior to 3.3.13, the previous fix for CVE-2026-25738 did not cover an edge case, allowing an event organizer to submit a crafted URL that points to a prohibited local target but is accepted as valid by Indico. The organizer can read data returned by the target through affected Indico features. This issue is fixed in version 3.3.13. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75875 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-08 | 9.8 Critical |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to path traversal. | ||||
| CVE-2026-80381 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-08 | 9.8 Critical |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute unauthorized SQL statements due to SQL injection. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82895 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-08 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82900 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-08 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.2, and 12.1 could allow a remote attacker to delete arbitrary files due to improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory. | ||||
| CVE-2026-81932 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-08 | 8.6 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 is vulnerable to SQL injection. A remote unauthenticated attacker could send specially crafted SQL statements, which could allow the attacker to view, add, modify, or delete information in the back-end database. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84032 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-08 | 5.6 Medium |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.2 could allow a remote attacker to conduct a man-in-the-middle attack due to improper certificate validation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84035 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-08 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84057 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-08 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.2, and 12.1 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84058 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-08 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 is vulnerable to a buffer overrun in the TDS (Microsoft SQL Server) PRELOGIN packet decoder. A remote attacker who can send a specially crafted TDS PRELOGIN packet to a network monitored by an IBM Guardium Collector may cause a denial of service or potentially execute arbitrary code on the Collector appliance. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84198 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-08 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84230 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-08 | 7.5 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.2 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to a race condition resulting from concurrent unsynchronized writes to a shared map. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84246 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-08 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84247 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-08 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service due to a path traversal vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84249 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-08 | 9.8 Critical |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2, and 12.2.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary management operations due to missing authentication for critical function. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84875 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-08 | 7.5 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84891 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-08 | 5.9 Medium |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to use of hard-coded credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87980 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-10-08 | 3.1 Low |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext storage of sensitive information in logs. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93034 | 1 Sglang | 1 Sglang | 2026-10-08 | 9.8 Critical |
| SGLang contains an arbitrary code execution vulnerability caused by the ZMQ message decoder unconditionally deserializing PickleWrapper payloads via pickle.loads() in _maybe_unwrap_pickle without type allowlisting or authentication; this vulnerability persists via the msgpack path even when SGLANG_USE_PICKLE_IPC is disabled, and becomes remotely exploitable if data-parallel attention is enabled with a non-loopback --dist-init-addr setting. | ||||
| CVE-2026-66087 | 1 Apache | 1 Dolphinscheduler | 2026-10-08 | 8.1 High |
| An authorization bypass vulnerability in Apache DolphinScheduler allows authenticated users to operate task instance in projects they are not authorized to access through the * /dolphinscheduler/projects/{projectCode}/task-instances/{taskInstanceId}/stop * /dolphinscheduler/projects/{projectCode}/task-instances/{taskInstanceId}/savepoint This issue affects Apache DolphinScheduler: before 3.4.3. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.4.3, which fixes the issue. | ||||