| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Incomplete cleanup after loading a CPU microcode patch may allow a privileged attacker to degrade the entropy of the RDRAND instruction, potentially resulting in loss of integrity for SEV-SNP guests. |
| An out-of-bounds read in the ASP could allow a privileged attacker with access to a malicious bootloader to potentially read sensitive memory resulting in loss of confidentiality. |
| Improper validation of an array index in the AND power Management Firmware could allow a privileged attacker to corrupt AGESA memory potentially leading to a loss of integrity. |
| Incorrect default permissions in AMD StoreMI™ could allow an attacker to achieve privilege escalation potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution. |
| Improper removal of sensitive information before storage or transfer in AMD Crash Defender could allow an attacker to obtain kernel address information potentially resulting in loss of confidentiality. |
| Type confusion in the AMD Secure Processor (ASP) could allow an attacker to pass a malformed argument to the External Global Memory Interconnect Trusted Agent (XGMI TA) leading to a memory safety violation potentially resulting in loss of confidentiality, integrity, or availability. |
| A NULL pointer dereference in AMD Crash Defender could allow an attacker to write a NULL output to a log file potentially resulting in a system crash and loss of availability. |
| Improper input validation within the XOCL driver may allow a local attacker to generate an integer overflow condition, potentially resulting in loss of confidentiality or availability. |
| A bug within some AMD CPUs could allow a local admin-privileged attacker to run a SEV-SNP guest using stale TLB entries, potentially resulting in loss of data integrity. |
| Improper input validation in Satellite Management Controller (SMC) may allow an attacker with privileges to manipulate Redfish® API commands to remove files from the local root directory, potentially resulting in data corruption. |
| Improper input validation in the SMM handler could allow an attacker with Ring0 access to write to SMRAM and modify execution flow for S3 (sleep) wake up, potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution. |
| Write what were condition within AMD CPUs may allow an admin-privileged attacker to modify the configuration of the CPU pipeline potentially resulting in the corruption of the stack pointer inside an SEV-SNP guest. |
| Insufficient validation within Xilinx Run Time framework could allow a local attacker to escalate privileges from user space to kernel space, potentially compromising confidentiality, integrity, and/or availability. |
| Improper handling of insufficient entropy in the AMD CPUs could allow a local attacker to influence the values returned by the RDSEED instruction, potentially resulting in the consumption of insufficiently random values. |
| Improper handling of direct memory writes in the input-output memory management unit could allow a malicious guest virtual machine (VM) to flood a host with writes, potentially causing a fatal machine check error resulting in denial of service. |
| An integer overflow in the SMU could allow a privileged attacker to potentially write memory beyond the end of the reserved dRAM area resulting in loss of integrity or availability. |
| A buffer overflow with Xilinx Run Time Environment may allow a local attacker to read or corrupt data from the advanced extensible interface (AXI), potentially resulting in loss of confidentiality, integrity, and/or availability. |
| An out of bounds write in the Linux graphics driver could allow an attacker to overflow the buffer potentially resulting in loss of confidentiality, integrity, or availability. |
| Insufficient bounds checking in AMD TEE (Trusted Execution Environment) could allow an attacker with a compromised userspace to invoke a command with malformed arguments leading to out of bounds memory access, potentially resulting in loss of integrity or availability. |
| Improper Prevention of Lock Bit Modification in SEV firmware could allow a privileged attacker to downgrade firmware potentially resulting in a loss of integrity. |
