Export limit exceeded: 368544 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (368544 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-41023 | 1 Thesamur | 1 Autogpt | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| An authentication bypass vulnerability has been found in Thesamur's AutoGPT. This vulnerability allows an attacker to bypass authentication mechanisms. Once inside the web application, the attacker can use any of its features regardless of the authorisation method used. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41030 | 1 T-innova | 1 Deporsite | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Lack of authorisation in Deporsite by T-INNOVA. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to obtain information from other users via GET ‘/ajax/TInnova_v2/Integrantes_Recurso_v2_1/llamadaAjax/buscarPersona’ using the ‘dni’ parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41031 | 1 T-innova | 1 Deporsite | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Lack of authorisation in Deporsite by T-INNOVA. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to change other users' profile pictures via a POST request using the parameters ‘IdPersona’ and “Foto” in ‘/ajax/TInnova_c/FotoUsuario/llamadaAjax/uploadImage’. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41649 | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit insufficient input validation to write data beyond the bounds of a buffer, potentially leading to a denial-of-service condition for the devices. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41064 | 1 Gtt | 1 Opensiac | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Incorrect authentication vulnerability in OpenSIAC, which could allow an attacker to impersonate a person using Cl@ve as an authentication method. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41065 | 1 Luna Imaging | 1 Luna | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability type in LUNA software v7.5.5.6. This vulnerability allows an attacker to execute JavaScript code in the victim's browser by inyecting a malicious payload through the 'Edit Batch Name' function. THe payload is stored by the application and subsequently displayed without proper sanitization when other users access it. This vulnerability can be exploited to steal sensitive user data, such as session cookies, or to perform actions on behalf of the user. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41081 | 1 Zuinq Studio | 1 Ismygym | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IsMyGym by Zuinq Studio. This vulnerability allows an attacker to execute JavaScript code in the victim's browser by sending them a malicious URL with '/<PATH>.php/<XSS>'. This vulnerability can be exploited to steal sensitive user data, such as session cookies, or to perform actions on behalf of the user. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41082 | 1 Altitude | 1 Communication Server | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Illegal HTTP request traffic vulnerability (CL.0) in Altitude Communication Server, caused by inconsistent analysis of multiple HTTP requests over a single Keep-Alive connection using Content-Length headers. This can cause a desynchronization of requests between frontend and backend servers, which could allow request hiding, cache poisoning or security bypass. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41083 | 1 Altitude | 1 Communication Server | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Vulnerability in Altitude Authentication Service and Altitude Communication Server v8.5.3290.0 by Altitude, where manipulation of Host header in HTTP requests allows redirection to an arbitrary URL or modification of the base URL to trick the victim into sending login credentials to a malicious website. This behavior can be used to redirect clients to endpoints controlled by the attacker. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41084 | 2 Sesame Labs, Sesame Labs S.l | 2 Sesame, Sesame | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Sesame web application, due to the fact that uploaded SVG images are not properly sanitized. This allows attackers to embed malicious scripts in SVG files by sending a POST request using the 'logo' parameter in '/api/v3/companies/<ID>/logo', which are then stored on the server and executed in the context of any user who accesses the compromised resource. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41085 | 1 Apidog | 1 Apidog Web Platform | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability type in Apidog in the version 2.7.15, where SVG image uploads are not properly sanitized. This allows attackers to embed malicious scripts in SVG files by sending a POST request to '/api/v1/user-avatar', which are then stored on the server and executed in the context of any user accessing the compromised resource. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41088 | 1 Xibosignage | 1 Xibo | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in Xibo Signage's Xibo CMS v4.1.2, due to a lack of proper validation of user input. To exploit the vulnerability, the attacker must create a template in the 'Templates' section, then add a text element in the 'Global Elements' section, and finally modify the 'Text' field in the section with the malicious payload. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41089 | 1 Xibosignage | 1 Xibo | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in Xibo CMS v4.1.2 from Xibo Signage, due to a lack of proper validation of user input. To exploit the vulnerability, the attacker must create a template in the 'Templates' section, then add an element that has the 'Configuration Name' field, such as the 'Clock' widget. Next, modify the 'Configuration Name' field in the left-hand section. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41087 | 1 Taclia | 1 Taclia | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability stored in tha Taclia web application, where the uploaded SVG images are not properly sanitized. This allows to the attackers to embed malicious scripts in SVG files such as image profiles, which are then stored on the server and executed in the context of any user who accesses the compromised resource. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41090 | 1 Ccn-cert | 1 Microclaudia | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| microCLAUDIA in v3.2.0 and prior has an improper access control vulnerability. This flaw allows an authenticated user to perform unauthorized actions on other organizations' systems by sending direct API requests. To do so, the attacker can use organization identifiers obtained through a compromised endpoint or deduced manually. This vulnerability allows access between tenants, enabling an attacker to list and manage remote assets, uninstall agents, and even delete vaccines configurations. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41100 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Incorrect authentication vulnerability in ParkingDoor. Through this vulnerability it is possible to operate the device without the access being logged in the application and even if the access permissions have been revoked. | ||||
| CVE-2025-11393 | 1 Redhat | 2 Insights-runtimes, Lightspeed For Runtimes | 2026-04-15 | 8.7 High |
| A flaw was found in runtimes-inventory-rhel8-operator. An internal proxy component is incorrectly configured. Because of this flaw, the proxy attaches the cluster's main administrative credentials to any command it receives, instead of only the specific reports it is supposed to handle. This allows a standard user within the cluster to send unauthorized commands to the management platform, effectively acting with the full permissions of the cluster administrator. This could lead to unauthorized changes to the cluster's configuration or status on the Red Hat platform. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27937 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Quick Agent V3 and Quick Agent V2 contain an issue with improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('Path Traversal'). If exploited, an arbitrary file in the affected product may be obtained by a remote attacker who can log in to the product. | ||||
| CVE-2025-2843 | 1 Redhat | 1 Cluster Observability Operator | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| A flaw was found in the Observability Operator. The Operator creates a ServiceAccount with *ClusterRole* upon deployment of the *Namespace-Scoped* Custom Resource MonitorStack. This issue allows an adversarial Kubernetes Account with only namespaced-level roles, for example, a tenant controlling a namespace, to create a MonitorStack in the authorized namespace and then elevate permission to the cluster level by impersonating the ServiceAccount created by the Operator, resulting in privilege escalation and other issues. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41222 | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM i800 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM i801 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM i802 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM i803 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM M2100 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM M2200 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM M969 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RMC30 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V4.X (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RP110 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS1600 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS1600F (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS1600T (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS400 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS401 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS416 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS416P (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V4.X (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V4.X (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RS8000 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS8000A (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS8000H (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS8000T (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS900 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V4.X (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RS900G (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V4.X (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RS900GP (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS900L (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-C01 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-XX (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-C01 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-XX (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS900W (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS910 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS910L (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS910W (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS920L (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS920W (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS930L (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS930W (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS940G (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS969 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V4.X (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V4.X (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2200 (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V4.X (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V4.X (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V4.X (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V4.X (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG907R (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG908C (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG909R (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG910C (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V4.X (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V5.X (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RSL910 (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RST2228 (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RST2228P (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RST916C (All versions < V5.10.0), RUGGEDCOM RST916P (All versions < V5.10.0). Affected devices do not properly handle malformed TLS handshake messages. This could allow an attacker with network access to the webserver to cause a denial of service resulting in the web server and the device to crash. | ||||