Export limit exceeded: 400623 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (8229 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-73722 | 2 Arubanetworks, Hewlett Packard Enterprise (hpe) | 2 Fabric Composer, Fabric Composer | 2026-09-02 | 7.2 High |
| Command injection vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of HPE Networking Fabric Composer could allow an authenticated remote attacker to perform command injection against the affected system. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands as a privileged user on the underlying operating system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-64060 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-09-02 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfs: Fix leak of request in netfs_write_begin() error handling Fix netfs_write_begin() to not leak our ref on the request in the event that we get an error from netfs_wait_for_read(). | ||||
| CVE-2026-47891 | 2 Spring, Vmware | 2 Spring Framework, Spring Framework | 2026-09-02 | 9.8 Critical |
| A Spring WebFlux application that relies on the Aalto XML processor to parse XML input does not correctly enforce the maxInMemorySize limit. Spring Framework 7.0.0 - 7.0.8 Spring Framework 6.2.0 - 6.2.19 Spring Framework 6.1.0 - 6.1.28 Spring Framework 6.0.0 - 6.0.30 Spring Framework 5.3.0 - 5.3.49 Spring Framework 5.2.25.RELEASE and earlier | ||||
| CVE-2026-59289 | 2 Spring, Vmware | 2 Spring For Graphql, Spring For Graphql | 2026-09-02 | 7.5 High |
| Spring for GraphQL's Spring Data pagination support resolves arguments of a scrollable query and forwards the client-supplied values to the underlying repository. An attacker can forge a malicious query for a Connection field that can exhaust application memory or place significant, prolonged load on the underlying datastore, resulting in a Denial of Service. Spring for GraphQL 2.0.0 - 2.0.4 Spring for GraphQL 1.4.0 - 1.4.6 Spring for GraphQL 1.2.0 - 1.3.9 | ||||
| CVE-2026-59287 | 2 Spring, Vmware | 2 Spring For Graphql, Spring For Graphql | 2026-09-02 | 5.9 Medium |
| Spring for GraphQL is vulnerable to Denial of Service attacks when using the WebSocket client with keepAlive enabled. Spring for GraphQL 2.0.0 - 2.0.4 Spring for GraphQL 1.4.0 - 1.4.6 Spring for GraphQL 1.3.0 - 1.3.9 | ||||
| CVE-2026-47861 | 2 Spring, Vmware | 2 Spring Integration, Spring Integration | 2026-09-02 | 6.3 Medium |
| An unauthenticated remote attacker who can send a single UDP packet to a Spring Integration UDP inbound adapter can cause the server to emit an outbound UDP datagram to an arbitrary internal or external host and port of the attacker's choosing. Spring Integration 7.1.0 Spring Integration 7.0.0 - 7.0.5 Spring Integration 6.5.0 - 6.5.10 Spring Integration 6.4.0 - 6.4.12 Spring Integration 5.5.21 and earlier | ||||
| CVE-2026-84311 | 1 Py-pdf | 1 Pypdf | 2026-09-02 | 5.5 Medium |
| pypdf is a free and open-source pure-python PDF library. Prior to 6.16.1, an attacker can craft a PDF that causes pypdf/_page.py PageObject._extract_text and PageObject.extract_xform_text to traverse a directed acyclic graph of reused form XObjects in which each form invokes a child multiple times, creating exponentially many traversal paths and causing long runtimes and large memory consumption. This issue is fixed in version 6.16.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-47874 | 2 Pivotal, Spring | 2 Reactor Netty, Reactor Netty | 2026-09-02 | 5.3 Medium |
| The vulnerability occurs when a client sends HTTP/1.1 pipelined requests over a single connection, causing the Reactor Netty HTTP server to consume an excessive amount of memory. Reactor Netty 1.3.0 - 1.3.6 Reactor Netty 1.1.0 - 1.2.18 Reactor Netty 1.0.52 and earlier | ||||
| CVE-2026-19474 | 1 Fastify | 1 Fastify-multipart | 2026-09-02 | 7.5 High |
| @fastify/multipart is a multipart form-data parser for Fastify. In versions from 3.0.0 up to but not including 10.1.1, request.saveRequestFiles() can leave completed temporary files on disk when a client disconnects while the parser is advancing between multipart parts. The iterator rejection that occurs between parts falls outside the per-file cleanup path, so an earlier completed file is never removed. An unauthenticated client can repeat this to cause persistent, linear disk consumption, leading to denial of service. This is an incomplete-fix variant of CVE-2025-24033. The issue is fixed in @fastify/multipart 10.1.1. Users should upgrade to 10.1.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58063 | 2 Bouncycastle, Legion Of The Bouncy Castle Inc. | 6 Bc-java, Bouncy Castle For Java Lts, Fips Java Api and 3 more | 2026-09-02 | 5.3 Medium |
| In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, BCFKS keystore load honours unbounded KDF cost from untrusted file. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.12, and Bouncy Castle for Java FIPS (BC-FJA) before bc-fips 1.0.2.7 (1.0.X series), 2.0.2 (2.0.X series) and 2.1.3 (2.1.X series). | ||||
| CVE-2026-72682 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-09-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can lead to a denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated user holding only low, read-level Agent Builder privileges could submit a specially crafted request that causes Kibana to consume an unbounded amount of memory, terminating the process and denying service to all users of the instance. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72652 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-09-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can lead to a denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated user can submit a specially crafted request that causes excessive resource consumption, which may render Kibana unavailable. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72659 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-09-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A specially crafted, malformed payload submitted to a Kibana visualization feature by an authenticated user holding only low-privileged access is not correctly validated before use. Processing the request causes unbounded memory growth in the Kibana process, which is terminated by the host once available memory is exhausted. Kibana then becomes unavailable to all users until the service is restarted. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72653 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-09-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated user who is authorized to manage maintenance windows could submit a specially crafted, malformed payload that causes the Kibana process to consume excessive resources. Kibana becomes unresponsive for all users and does not recover without manual intervention. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72651 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-09-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated user with read-only privileges to the alerting feature could submit a specially crafted, malformed payload that causes the Kibana process to consume excessive resources. A single request is sufficient to leave Kibana unable to serve requests for all users until the process is restarted. | ||||
| CVE-2026-49089 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-09-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A query expression accepted by a connector reporting operation was processed without any limit on its size, and an oversized expression caused the Kibana process to spend an unbounded amount of time evaluating it. An authenticated user with read-only privileges was able to send a single request that left Kibana unable to serve any user until the process was restarted. | ||||
| CVE-2026-82691 | 1 D-link | 4 Dns-320l, Dns-327l, Dns-340l and 1 more | 2026-09-02 | 9.1 Critical |
| A vulnerability has been found in D-Link DNS-320L, DNS-327L, DNS-340L and DNS-345 up to 20260717. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /cgi-bin/usb_device.cgi of the component CGI Handler. Such manipulation of the argument f_ups_ip leads to os command injection. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72667 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-09-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can lead to a denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A specially crafted request submitted by an authenticated user with minimal privileges to a validation capability of the Observability log analysis feature causes Kibana to perform an unbounded amount of concurrent work. This can exhaust the memory available to the Kibana process and make Kibana unavailable to all users until it is restarted. The severity of the outcome depends on the resources allocated to the deployment; on well-provisioned deployments a single request may cause degraded performance and elevated memory pressure rather than a full outage, but the request is inexpensive to repeat. | ||||
| CVE-2026-33465 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-09-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can lead to a denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated user with low-level permissions could submit a specially crafted request that causes excessive resource consumption, which may render Kibana unavailable. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72674 | 1 Elastic | 1 Kibana | 2026-09-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can lead to a denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A user-supplied list of document fields accepted by the Kibana Playground for RAG feature was neither bounded in length nor de-duplicated before it was used to assemble the response for each matching document. A single crafted request could therefore make Kibana build a response far larger than the data it was derived from, and the resulting processing and memory pressure exhausts the resources of the Kibana instance. | ||||