| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| SQL injection vulnerability in the Upgrade/Downgrade component (DBMS_UPGRADE_INTERNAL) for Oracle Database 10.1.0.5 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unknown vectors, aka DB07. NOTE: as of 20070424, Oracle has not disputed reliable claims that DB07 is actually for multiple issues. |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Oracle Database 10.1.0.5 and 10.2.0.2 have unknown impact and remote authenticated attack vectors, related to (1) Change Data Capture (CDC), aka DB08, and (2) Oracle Instant Client, aka DB11. NOTE: as of 20070424, oracle has not disputed reliable claims that these issues are buffer overflows using a long CHANGE_TABLE_NAME parameter to the DBMS_CDC_IPUBLISH.CHGTAB_CACHE procedure (DB08) and Oracle Instant Client genezi utility (DB11). |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Upgrade/Downgrade component of Oracle Database 9.0.1.5 and 9.2.0.7 has unknown impact and attack vectors, aka DB13. NOTE: as of 20070424, Oracle has not disputed reliable claims that this is a buffer overflow involving the "mig utility." |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in boundary_rules.jsp in the Administration Front End for Oracle Enterprise (Ultra) Search, as used in Database Server 9.2.0.8, 10.1.0.5, and 10.2.0.2, and in Application Server 9.0.4.3, 10.1.2.0.2, and 10.1.2.2.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTML or web script via the EXPTYPE parameter, aka SES01. |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Oracle Database 9.0.1.5+, 9.2.0.8, 9.2.0.8DV, 10.1.0.5, and 10.2.0.3 allows remote authenticated users to have an unknown impact via (1) SYS.DBMS_DRS in the DataGuard component (DB03), (2) SYS.DBMS_STANDARD in the PL/SQL component (DB10), (3) MDSYS.RTREE_IDX in the Spatial component (DB16), and (4) SQL Compiler (DB17). NOTE: a reliable researcher claims that DB17 is for using Views to perform unauthorized insert, update, or delete actions. |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Oracle Database 10.1.0.5 allow remote authenticated users to have an unknown impact via (a) the Oracle Text component, including (1) unspecified vectors (DB05), (2) CTXSYS.DRVXMD (DB06), (3) CTXSYS.DRI_MOVE_CTXSYS (DB07), (4) CTXSYS.DRVXMD (DB08), and (b) JavaVM (DB14). |
| The GIOP service in TNS Listener in the Oracle Net Services component in Oracle Database 9.0.1.5+, 9.2.0.8, 9.2.0.8DV, 10.1.0.5, and 10.2.0.3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or read potentially sensitive memory via a connect GIOP packet with an invalid data size, which triggers a buffer over-read, aka DB22. |
| Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in the CTXSYS Intermedia application for the Oracle Text component (CTX_DOC) in Oracle Database 10.1.0.5 and 10.2.0.3 allow remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the (1) THEMES, (2) GIST, (3) TOKENS, (4) FILTER, (5) HIGHLIGHT, and (6) MARKUP procedures, aka DB03. NOTE: remote unauthenticated attack vectors exist when CTXSYS is used with oracle Application Server. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the XML DB component in Oracle Database 9.2.0.8, 9.2.0.8DV, 10.1.0.5, and 10.2.0.3 has unknown impact and remote attack vectors, aka DB01. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Advanced Queuing component in Oracle Database 9.0.1.5 FIPS+ and 10.1.0.5 has unknown impact and remote attack vectors, aka DB03. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Spatial component in Oracle Database 10.1.0.5 and 10.2.0.3 has unknown impact and remote attack vectors, aka DB07. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Jinitiator component in Oracle Application Server 1.3.1.27 and E-Business Suite 11.5.10.2 has unknown impact and remote attack vectors, aka AS01. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the PeopleTools component in Oracle PeopleSoft Enterprise and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne 8.48.15 and 8.49.07 has unknown impact and remote attack vectors, aka PSE02. |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Oracle Database 10.1.0.5 and 10.2.0.3 have unknown impact and remote authenticated attack vectors related to (1) SDO_UTIL in the Oracle Spatial component, aka DB05; or (2) fine grained auditing in the Audit component, aka DB14. NOTE: the previous information was obtained from the Oracle CPU. Oracle has not commented on reliable researcher claims that DB05 is SQL injection. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Advanced Queuing component in Oracle Database 9.0.1.5 FIPS+, and 10.1.0.5 has unknown impact and remote attack vectors related to SYS.DBMS_AQJMS_INTERNAL, aka DB15. NOTE: the previous information was obtained from the April 2008 CPU. Oracle has not commented on reliable researcher claims that DB15 is for multiple buffer overflows in the (1) AQ$_REGISTER and (2) AQ$_UNREGISTER procedures. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Advanced Replication component in Oracle Database 9.0.1.5 FIPS+, 9.2.0.8, 9.2.0.8DV, 10.1.0.5, and 10.2.0.3 has unknown impact and local attack vectors. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Advanced Replication component in Oracle Database 9.0.1.5 FIPS+, 9.2.0.8, 9.2.0.8DV, 10.1.0.5, 10.2.0.4, and 11.1.0.6 has unknown impact and remote authenticated attack vectors related to SYS.DBMS_DEFER_SYS. NOTE: the previous information was obtained from the Oracle July 2008 CPU. Oracle has not commented on reliable researcher claims that this is a SQL injection vulnerability in the DELETE_TRAN procedure. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Spatial component in Oracle Database 10.1.0.5, 10.2.0.3, and 11.1.0.6 has unknown impact and remote authenticated attack vectors related to MDSYS.SDO_TOPO_MAP. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Authentication component in Oracle Database 11.1.0.6 has unknown impact and remote authenticated attack vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2008-2604. |
| Oracle 10g R2 and possibly other versions allows remote attackers to trigger internal errors, and possibly have other impacts, via an "alter session set events" command with invalid arguments. NOTE: this issue was originally disputed by a third party, but the dispute was retracted. NOTE: this issue was called an "integer overflow" in the original source, but this might be incorrect. |
