Export limit exceeded: 362971 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (362971 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-27425 | 2026-07-02 | 7.1 High | ||
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in Automotive Listings <= 18.6 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-50284 | 2026-07-02 | N/A | ||
| Craft CMS is a content management system (CMS). In versions 5.0.0-RC1 through 5.9.21 and 4.0.0-RC1 through 4.17.14, theAssetsController::actionDeleteFolder() only requires the deleteAssets:<volume-uid> permission for the target folder. It never enforces deletePeerAssets:<volume-uid>, even though Assets::deleteFoldersByIds() cascades deletion to every descendant folder and every asset inside, regardless of the uploader's assigned privileges. A low-privilege user who has been granted folder-management rights on a shared volume can therefore destroy assets uploaded by other users (peer assets), bypassing the per-asset peer-permission check that the sibling actionDeleteAsset endpoint correctly applies. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.17.15 and 5.9.22. | ||||
| CVE-2026-14427 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-07-02 | 8.3 High |
| Heap buffer overflow in Skia in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.46 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Critical) | ||||
| CVE-2026-14410 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-07-02 | N/A |
| Inappropriate implementation in Skia in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.46 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) | ||||
| CVE-2026-14409 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-07-02 | 7.5 High |
| Inappropriate implementation in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.46 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) | ||||
| CVE-2026-14411 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-07-02 | 9.6 Critical |
| Insufficient validation of untrusted input in ANGLE in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.46 allowed a remote attacker to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2026-14414 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-07-02 | 5.3 Medium |
| Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Skia in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.46 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to obtain potentially sensitive information from process memory via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-14429 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-07-02 | 8.3 High |
| Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Skia in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.46 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2026-14389 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-07-02 | 8.3 High |
| Integer overflow in Skia in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.46 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-14430 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-07-02 | 8.8 High |
| Integer overflow in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.46 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2026-14416 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-07-02 | 9.6 Critical |
| Out of bounds read in Dawn in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.46 allowed a remote attacker to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) | ||||
| CVE-2026-57342 | 2 Shortpixel, Wordpress | 2 Shortpixel Adaptive Images, Wordpress | 2026-07-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| Subscriber Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in ShortPixel Adaptive Images <= 3.11.3 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-57344 | 2 Radiustheme, Wordpress | 2 Classified Listing, Wordpress | 2026-07-02 | 7.1 High |
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in Classified Listing <= 5.4.2 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-57347 | 2 Jetmonsters, Wordpress | 2 Hotel Booking Lite, Wordpress | 2026-07-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| Subscriber Sensitive Data Exposure in Hotel Booking Lite <= 6.0.3 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-57348 | 2 Cozmoslabs, Wordpress | 2 Paid Member Subscriptions, Wordpress | 2026-07-02 | 7.2 High |
| Unauthenticated Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Paid Member Subscriptions <= 3.0.4 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-57349 | 2 Etruel, Wordpress | 2 Wpematico Rss Feed Fetcher, Wordpress | 2026-07-02 | 7.1 High |
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in WPeMatico RSS Feed Fetcher <= 2.8.17 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-57351 | 2 Haktansuren, Wordpress | 2 Handl Utm Grabber, Wordpress | 2026-07-02 | 7.1 High |
| Unauthenticated Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in HandL UTM Grabber <= 2.9.2 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-57353 | 2026-07-02 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| Subscriber Broken Access Control in Link Whisper Premium <= 2.9.0 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4770 | 2026-07-02 | 4.6 Medium | ||
| Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in TR7 Cyber Defense Inc. Web Application Firewall allows DOM-Based XSS. This issue affects Web Application Firewall: from v1.0.42.239 before v1.4.0.117. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55794 | 2026-07-02 | N/A | ||
| Craft CMS is a content management system (CMS). In versions 5.9.0 and above prior to 5.10.0, control panel users with the ability to edit entries can execute unsandboxed Twig code via the HTTP Referrer header, potentially leading to authenticated RCE. The issue happens when a user is saving entries. Strings for a signed redirect URL are being compiled as a Twig template via renderObjectTemplate(), and while a sandboxed alternative already exists (renderSandboxedObjectTemplate()), it is not used in this case. This signed URL can be specified by users, as it is reflected in the “Referer” HTTP request header, which is under attacker control. This issue has been fixed in version 5.10.0. | ||||