Export limit exceeded: 404563 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (9823 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-11689 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| The HQ Rental Software plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5.29. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the displaySettingsPage() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update arbitrary options that can be leveraged for privilege escalation via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-3997 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in dazhouda lecms 3.0.3. This affects an unknown part of the file /index.php?my-profile-ajax-1 of the component Personal Information Page. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11419 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium |
| The Password for WP plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the get3_init_admin_page() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-67626 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Angel Costa WP SEO Search wp-seo-search allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP SEO Search: from n/a through <= 1.1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0807 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The CITS Support svg, webp Media and TTF,OTF File Upload, Use Custom Fonts plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the cits_settings_tab() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-62797 | 1 Rathena | 1 Fluxcp | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| FluxCP is a web-based Control Panel for rAthena servers written in PHP. A critical Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the FluxCP-based website template used by multiple rAthena/Ragnarok servers. State-changing POST endpoints accept browser-initiated requests that are authorized solely by the session cookie without per-request anti-CSRF tokens or robust Origin/Referer validation. An attacker who can lure a logged-in user to an attacker-controlled page can cause that user to perform sensitive actions without their intent. This vulnerability is fixed with commit e3f130c. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12454 | 2 Slicewp, Wordpress | 2 Affiliate Program Suite, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium |
| The Affiliate Program Suite — SliceWP Affiliates plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.23. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12554 | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| The Peter’s Custom Anti-Spam plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.2.3. This is due to missing nonce validation on the cas_register_post() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to blacklist emails via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-7202 | 1 Elgato | 3 Key Light, Light Strip, Ring Light | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Elgato's Key Lights and related light products allows an attacker to host a malicious webpage that remotely controlles the victim's lights. | ||||
| CVE-2025-69634 | 1 Dolibarr | 1 Dolibarr | 2026-04-15 | 9 Critical |
| Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Dolibarr ERP & CRM v.22.0.9 allows a remote attacker to escalate privileges via the notes field in perms.php NOTE: this is disputed by a third party who indicates that exploitation can only occur if an unprivileged user knows the token of an admin user. | ||||
| CVE-2020-28398 | 1 Siemens | 11 Ruggedcom Rox Mx5000, Ruggedcom Rox Mx5000re, Ruggedcom Rox Rx1400 and 8 more | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000RE (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1400 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1500 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1501 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1510 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1511 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1512 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1524 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1536 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX5000 (All versions < V2.16.0). The CLI feature in the web interface of affected devices is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery (CSRF). This could allow an attacker to read or modify the device configuration by tricking an authenticated legitimate user into accessing a malicious link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-35773 | 2026-04-15 | 7.1 High | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WPJohnny, zerOneIT Comment Reply Email allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS).This issue affects Comment Reply Email: from n/a through 1.3. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13709 | 2 Linear, Wordpress | 2 Linear, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Linear plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.8.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'linear-debug'. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to reset the plugin's cache via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2020-10095 | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High | ||
| Various Lexmark devices have CSRF that allows an attacker to modify the configuration of the device. | ||||
| CVE-2021-47800 | 1 B2evolution | 2 B2evolution, B2evolution Cms | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| b2evolution 7.2.2 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to modify admin account details without authentication. Attackers can craft a malicious HTML form to submit unauthorized changes to user profiles by tricking victims into loading a specially crafted webpage. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13913 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| The InstaWP Connect – 1-click WP Staging & Migration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.1.0.83. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation in the '/migrate/templates/main.php' file. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to include and execute arbitrary files on the server, allowing the execution of any PHP code in those files. This can be used to bypass access controls, obtain sensitive data, or achieve code execution in cases where images and other “safe” file types can be uploaded and included. | ||||
| CVE-2024-24336 | 2 Koha, Koha-community | 2 Koha, Koha Library Software | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High |
| A multiple Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the '/members/moremember.pl', and ‘/members/members-home.pl’ endpoints within Koha Library Management System version 23.05.05 and earlier allows malicious staff users to carry out CSRF attacks, including unauthorized changes to usernames and passwords of users visiting the affected page, via the 'Circulation note' and ‘Patrons Restriction’ components. | ||||
| CVE-2025-60535 | 1 Wallosapp | 1 Wallos | 2026-04-15 | 7.3 High |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the component /endpoints/currency/currency of Wallos v4.1.1 allows attackers to execute arbitrary operations via a crafted GET request. | ||||
| CVE-2024-1415 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Responsive Contact Form Builder Lead Generation | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Responsive Contact Form Builder & Lead Generation Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.8.9. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on several functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to invoke those functions via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. These actions may result in form deletion, and lead signup as well as file upload. | ||||
| CVE-2024-9661 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The WP All Import Pro plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.9.7. This is due to missing nonce validation on the delete_and_edit function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete imported content (posts, comments, users, etc.) via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||