Search Results (10305 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2025-62102 2 Apasionados, Wordpress 2 Dofollow Case By Case, Wordpress 2026-04-15 4.3 Medium
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in apasionados DoFollow Case by Case dofollow-case-by-case allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects DoFollow Case by Case: from n/a through <= 3.5.1.
CVE-2025-62346 1 Hcltech 1 Glovius Cloud 2026-04-15 6.8 Medium
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified in HCL Glovius Cloud. An attacker can force a user's web browser to execute an unwanted, malicious action on a trusted site where the user is authenticated, specifically on one endpoint.
CVE-2025-62362 2026-04-15 N/A
gpp-burgerportaal is a Dutch government citizen portal application. In versions before 2.0.3, 3.0.2, and 4.0.1, the name and email address of employees who publish content are exposed in network responses and can be discovered by viewing the browser's developer tools network tab. This information disclosure may violate employee privacy expectations and could be used for targeted attacks or unwanted contact. This issue has been patched in versions 2.0.3, 3.0.2, and 4.0.1. No known workarounds exist.
CVE-2025-62986 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2026-04-15 7.1 High
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in FanBridge FanBridge signup fanbridge-signup allows Stored XSS.This issue affects FanBridge signup: from n/a through <= 0.6.
CVE-2025-66004 1 Libimobiledevice 1 Libusbmuxd 2026-04-15 5.7 Medium
A Path Traversal vulnerability in usbmuxd allows local users to escalate to the service user.This issue affects usbmuxd: before 3ded00c9985a5108cfc7591a309f9a23d57a8cba.
CVE-2025-66600 1 Yokogawa 1 Fast/tools 2026-04-15 N/A
A vulnerability has been found in FAST/TOOLS provided by Yokogawa Electric Corporation. This product lacks HSTS (HTTP Strict Transport Security) configuration. When an attacker performs a Man in the middle (MITM) attack, communications with the web server could be sniffed. The affected products and versions are as follows: FAST/TOOLS (Packages: RVSVRN, UNSVRN, HMIWEB, FTEES, HMIMOB) R9.01 to R10.04
CVE-2025-7379 1 Asustor 2 Adm, Datasync Center 2026-04-15 N/A
A security bypass vulnerability allows exploitation via Reverse Tabnabbing, a type of phishing attack where attackers can manipulate the content of the original tab, leading to credential theft and other security risks. This issue affects DataSync Center: from 1.1.0 before 1.1.0.r207, and from 1.2.0 before 1.2.0.r206.
CVE-2025-9213 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2026-04-15 8.8 High
The TextBuilder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions 1.0.0 to 1.1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'handleToken' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update a user's authorization token via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. Once the token is updated, an attacker can update the user's password and email address.
CVE-2025-42616 1 Circl 1 Vulnerability-lookup 2026-04-15 N/A
Some endpoints in vulnerability-lookup that modified application state (e.g. changing database entries, user data, configurations, or other privileged actions) may have been accessible via HTTP GET requests without requiring a CSRF token. This flaw leaves the application vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks: an attacker who tricks a logged-in user into visiting a malicious website could cause the user’s browser to issue GET requests that perform unintended state-changing operations in the context of their authenticated session. Because the server would treat these GET requests as valid (since no CSRF protection or POST method enforcement was in place), the attacker could exploit this to escalate privileges, change settings, or carry out other unauthorized actions without needing the user’s explicit consent or awareness.  The fix ensures that all state-changing endpoints now require HTTP POST requests and include a valid CSRF token. This enforces that state changes cannot be triggered by arbitrary cross-site GET requests. This issue affects Vulnerability-Lookup: before 2.18.0.
CVE-2025-60535 1 Wallosapp 1 Wallos 2026-04-15 7.3 High
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the component /endpoints/currency/currency of Wallos v4.1.1 allows attackers to execute arbitrary operations via a crafted GET request.
CVE-2025-60208 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2026-04-15 8.8 High
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Tusko Trush Advanced Custom Fields : CPT Options Pages acf-cpt-options-pages allows Object Injection.This issue affects Advanced Custom Fields : CPT Options Pages: from n/a through <= 2.0.9.
CVE-2024-11336 2026-04-15 6.1 Medium
The Clickbank WordPress Plugin (Storefront) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.7. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation via the cs_menu page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2024-11444 2026-04-15 4.3 Medium
The CLUEVO LMS, E-Learning Platform plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.13.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the cluevo_render_module_ui() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete modules via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2024-12003 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2026-04-15 6.1 Medium
The WP System plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the generate_wp_system_page_content() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2025-60168 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2026-04-15 7.1 High
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in integrationshotelrunner HotelRunner Booking Widget hotelrunner allows Stored XSS.This issue affects HotelRunner Booking Widget: from n/a through <= 1.6.
CVE-2024-8065 1 Danswer-ai 1 Danswer 2026-04-15 N/A
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in version v1.4.1 of danswer-ai/danswer allows attackers to perform unauthorized actions in the context of the victim's browser. This includes connecting the victim's application with a malicious Slack Bot, inviting users, and deleting chats, among other actions. The application does not implement any CSRF protection, making it susceptible to these attacks.
CVE-2025-62771 1 Mercku 1 M6a 2026-04-15 7.5 High
Mercku M6a devices through 2.1.0 allow password changes via intranet CSRF attacks.
CVE-2025-62797 1 Rathena 1 Fluxcp 2026-04-15 N/A
FluxCP is a web-based Control Panel for rAthena servers written in PHP. A critical Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the FluxCP-based website template used by multiple rAthena/Ragnarok servers. State-changing POST endpoints accept browser-initiated requests that are authorized solely by the session cookie without per-request anti-CSRF tokens or robust Origin/Referer validation. An attacker who can lure a logged-in user to an attacker-controlled page can cause that user to perform sensitive actions without their intent. This vulnerability is fixed with commit e3f130c.
CVE-2025-62866 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2026-04-15 4.3 Medium
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Valerio Monti Auto Alt Text auto-alt-text allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Auto Alt Text: from n/a through <= 2.5.2.
CVE-2025-62871 1 Wordpress 1 Wordpress 2026-04-15 4.3 Medium
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Alex Prokopenko / JustCoded Just TinyMCE Custom Styles just-tinymce-styles allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Just TinyMCE Custom Styles: from n/a through <= 1.2.1.