| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| This vulnerability exists in SyroTech SY-GPON-1110-WDONT Router due to presence of root terminal access on a serial interface without proper access control. An attacker with physical access could exploit this by accessing the root shell on the vulnerable system.
Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges on the targeted system. |
| Asio C++ Library before 1.13.0 lacks a fallback error code in the case of SSL_ERROR_SYSCALL with no associated error information from the SSL library being used. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Cerberus PRO EN Engineering Tool (All versions), Cerberus PRO EN Fire Panel FC72x IP6 (All versions), Cerberus PRO EN Fire Panel FC72x IP7 (All versions), Cerberus PRO EN Fire Panel FC72x IP8 (All versions < IP8 SR4), Cerberus PRO EN X200 Cloud Distribution IP7 (All versions), Cerberus PRO EN X200 Cloud Distribution IP8 (All versions < V4.3.5618), Cerberus PRO EN X300 Cloud Distribution IP7 (All versions), Cerberus PRO EN X300 Cloud Distribution IP8 (All versions < V4.3.5617), Cerberus PRO UL Compact Panel FC922/924 (All versions < MP4), Cerberus PRO UL Engineering Tool (All versions < MP4), Cerberus PRO UL X300 Cloud Distribution (All versions < V4.3.0001), Desigo Fire Safety UL Compact Panel FC2025/2050 (All versions < MP4), Desigo Fire Safety UL Engineering Tool (All versions < MP4), Desigo Fire Safety UL X300 Cloud Distribution (All versions < V4.3.0001), Sinteso FS20 EN Engineering Tool (All versions), Sinteso FS20 EN Fire Panel FC20 MP6 (All versions), Sinteso FS20 EN Fire Panel FC20 MP7 (All versions), Sinteso FS20 EN Fire Panel FC20 MP8 (All versions < MP8 SR4), Sinteso FS20 EN X200 Cloud Distribution MP7 (All versions), Sinteso FS20 EN X200 Cloud Distribution MP8 (All versions < V4.3.5618), Sinteso FS20 EN X300 Cloud Distribution MP7 (All versions), Sinteso FS20 EN X300 Cloud Distribution MP8 (All versions < V4.3.5617), Sinteso Mobile (All versions). The network communication library in affected systems improperly handles memory buffers when parsing X.509 certificates.
This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to crash the network service. |
| The redirect_to method in Rails allows provided values to contain characters which are not legal in an HTTP header value. This results in the potential for downstream services which enforce RFC compliance on HTTP response headers to remove the assigned Location header. |
| Improper conditions check in some Intel(R) BIOS PPAM firmware may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. |
| Improper output Neutralization for Logs (CWE-117) in the Command Centre API Diagnostics Endpoint could allow an attacker limited ability to modify Command Centre log files.
This issue affects: Gallagher Command Centre v9.10 prior to vEL9.10.1268 (MR1). |
| The ParseAddressList function incorrectly handles comments (text within parentheses) within display names. Since this is a misalignment with conforming address parsers, it can result in different trust decisions being made by programs using different parsers. |
| Improper buffer restrictions in the UEFI firmware for some Intel(R) Processors may allow a privileged user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. |
| A firmware bug which may lead to misinterpretation of data in the AMC2-4WCF and AMC2-2WCF allowing an adversary to grant access to the last authorized user. |
| An issue in dc2niix before v.1.0.20240202 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the generated file name is not properly escaped and injected into a system call when certain types of compression are used. |
| Misinterpretation of Input vulnerability in OpenText™ Service Management Automation X (SMAX), OpenText™ Asset Management X (AMX), and OpenText™ Hybrid Cloud Management X (HCMX) products. The vulnerability could allow Input data manipulation.This issue affects Service Management Automation X (SMAX) versions: 2020.05, 2020.08, 2020.11, 2021.02, 2021.05, 2021.08, 2021.11, 2022.05, 2022.11, 2023.05; Asset Management X (AMX) versions: 2021.08, 2021.11, 2022.05, 2022.11, 2023.05; and Hybrid Cloud Management X (HCMX) versions: 2020.05, 2020.08, 2020.11, 2021.02, 2021.05, 2021.08, 2021.11, 2022.05, 2022.11, 2023.05.
|
| Incorrect boundary conditions in the Audio/Video component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 149, Firefox ESR 140.9, Thunderbird 149, and Thunderbird 140.9. |
| Incorrect boundary conditions in the Graphics: Text component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 149, Firefox ESR 140.9, Thunderbird 149, and Thunderbird 140.9. |
| Incorrect boundary conditions in the Graphics: WebGPU component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 149.0.2 and Thunderbird 149.0.2. |
| Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output vulnerability in the JsonAccessLogValve component of Apache Tomcat.
This issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.20, from 10.1.0-M1 through 10.1.53, from 9.0.40 through 9.0.116.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.21, 10.1.54 or 9.0.117 , which fix the issue. |
| A buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification, specifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs after certificate chain signature verification and requires either a CA to have signed a malicious certificate or for an application to continue certificate verification despite failure to construct a path to a trusted issuer. An attacker can craft a malicious email address in a certificate to overflow an arbitrary number of bytes containing the `.' character (decimal 46) on the stack. This buffer overflow could result in a crash (causing a denial of service). In a TLS client, this can be triggered by connecting to a malicious server. In a TLS server, this can be triggered if the server requests client authentication and a malicious client connects.
|
| A buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification, specifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs after certificate chain signature verification and requires either a CA to have signed the malicious certificate or for the application to continue certificate verification despite failure to construct a path to a trusted issuer. An attacker can craft a malicious email address to overflow four attacker-controlled bytes on the stack. This buffer overflow could result in a crash (causing a denial of service) or potentially remote code execution. Many platforms implement stack overflow protections which would mitigate against the risk of remote code execution. The risk may be further mitigated based on stack layout for any given platform/compiler. Pre-announcements of CVE-2022-3602 described this issue as CRITICAL. Further analysis based on some of the mitigating factors described above have led this to be downgraded to HIGH. Users are still encouraged to upgrade to a new version as soon as possible. In a TLS client, this can be triggered by connecting to a malicious server. In a TLS server, this can be triggered if the server requests client authentication and a malicious client connects. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.7 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2,3.0.3,3.0.4,3.0.5,3.0.6). |
| A vulnerability was detected in D-Link DIR-645 1.01/1.02/1.03. Impacted is the function hedwigcgi_main of the file /cgi-bin/hedwig.cgi. The manipulation results in stack-based buffer overflow. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer. |
| A vulnerability was detected in Totolink A800R 4.1.2cu.5137_B20200730. This impacts the function setAppEasyWizardConfig in the library /lib/cste_modules/app.so. The manipulation of the argument apcliSsid results in buffer overflow. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. |
| ewe is a Gleam web server. Prior to version 3.0.6, the encode_headers function in src/ewe/internal/encoder.gleam directly interpolates response header keys and values into raw HTTP bytes without validating or stripping CRLF (\r\n) sequences. An application that passes user-controlled data into response headers (e.g., setting a Location redirect header from a request parameter) allows an attacker to inject arbitrary HTTP response content, leading to response splitting, cache poisoning, and possible cross-site scripting. Notably, ewe does validate CRLF in incoming request headers via validate_field_value() in the HTTP/1.1 parser — but provides no equivalent protection for outgoing response headers in the encoder. This issue has been patched in version 3.0.6. |
