Export limit exceeded: 377151 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (377151 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-33910 | 1 Mantisbt | 1 Mantisbt | 2024-11-21 | 5.4 Medium |
| An XSS vulnerability in MantisBT before 2.25.5 allows remote attackers to attach crafted SVG documents to issue reports or bugnotes. When a user or an admin clicks on the attachment, file_download.php opens the SVG document in a browser tab instead of downloading it as a file, causing the JavaScript code to execute. | ||||
| CVE-2022-33903 | 1 Torproject | 1 Tor | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| Tor 0.4.7.x before 0.4.7.8 allows a denial of service via the wedging of RTT estimation. | ||||
| CVE-2022-33898 | 1 Intel | 1 Nuc Watchdog Timer Utility | 2024-11-21 | 6.7 Medium |
| Insecure inherited permissions in some Intel(R) NUC Watchdog Timer installation software before version 2.0.21.0 may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2022-33890 | 1 Autodesk | 11 Autocad, Autocad Advance Steel, Autocad Architecture and 8 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted PCT or DWF file when consumed through DesignReview.exe application could lead to memory corruption vulnerability by read access violation. This vulnerability in conjunction with other vulnerabilities could lead to code execution in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2022-33889 | 1 Autodesk | 11 Autocad, Autocad Advance Steel, Autocad Architecture and 8 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted GIF or JPEG files when parsed through Autodesk Design Review 2018, and AutoCAD 2023 and 2022 could be used to write beyond the allocated heap buffer. This vulnerability could lead to arbitrary code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2022-33887 | 1 Autodesk | 10 Autocad, Autocad Advance Steel, Autocad Architecture and 7 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted PDF file when parsed through Autodesk AutoCAD 2023 causes an unhandled exception. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash or read sensitive data or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2022-33886 | 1 Autodesk | 10 Autocad, Autocad Advance Steel, Autocad Architecture and 7 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted MODEL and SLDPRT file can be used to write beyond the allocated buffer while parsing through Autodesk AutoCAD 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, and Maya 2023 and 2022. The vulnerability exists because the application fails to handle crafted MODEL and SLDPRT files, which causes an unhandled exception. A malicious actor could leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. | ||||
| CVE-2022-33885 | 1 Autodesk | 10 Autocad, Autocad Advance Steel, Autocad Architecture and 7 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted X_B, CATIA, and PDF file when parsed through Autodesk AutoCAD 2023 and 2022 can be used to write beyond the allocated buffer. This vulnerability can lead to arbitrary code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2022-33884 | 1 Autodesk | 10 Autocad, Autocad Advance Steel, Autocad Architecture and 7 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| Parsing a maliciously crafted X_B file can force Autodesk AutoCAD 2023 and 2022 to read beyond allocated boundaries. This vulnerability in conjunction with other vulnerabilities could lead to code execution in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2022-33883 | 1 Autodesk | 4 Advanced Material Exchange, Moldflow Adviser, Moldflow Communicator and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| A malicious crafted file consumed through Moldflow Synergy, Moldflow Adviser, Moldflow Communicator, and Advanced Material Exchange applications could lead to memory corruption vulnerability. This vulnerability in conjunction with other vulnerabilities could lead to code execution in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2022-33882 | 1 Autodesk | 1 Autodesk Desktop | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| Under certain conditions, an attacker could create an unintended sphere of control through a vulnerability present in file delete operation in Autodesk desktop app (ADA). An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to escalate privileges and execute arbitrary code. | ||||
| CVE-2022-33881 | 1 Autodesk | 10 Autocad, Autocad Advance Steel, Autocad Architecture and 7 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| Parsing a maliciously crafted PRT file can force Autodesk AutoCAD 2023 to read beyond allocated boundaries. This vulnerability in conjunction with other vulnerabilities could lead to code execution in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2022-33879 | 1 Apache | 1 Tika | 2024-11-21 | 3.3 Low |
| The initial fixes in CVE-2022-30126 and CVE-2022-30973 for regexes in the StandardsExtractingContentHandler were insufficient, and we found a separate, new regex DoS in a different regex in the StandardsExtractingContentHandler. These are now fixed in 1.28.4 and 2.4.1. | ||||
| CVE-2022-33878 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlient | 2024-11-21 | 2.2 Low |
| An exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor vulnerabiltiy [CWE-200] in FortiClient for Mac versions 7.0.0 through 7.0.5 may allow a local authenticated attacker to obtain the SSL-VPN password in cleartext via running a logstream for the FortiTray process in the terminal. | ||||
| CVE-2022-33877 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Forticlient, Forticonverter | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 Medium |
| An incorrect default permission [CWE-276] vulnerability in FortiClient (Windows) versions 7.0.0 through 7.0.6 and 6.4.0 through 6.4.8 and FortiConverter (Windows) versions 6.2.0 through 6.2.1, 7.0.0 and all versions of 6.0.0 may allow a local authenticated attacker to tamper with files in the installation folder, if FortiClient or FortiConverter is installed in an insecure folder. | ||||
| CVE-2022-33876 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiadc | 2024-11-21 | 5.1 Medium |
| Multiple instances of improper input validation vulnerability in Fortinet FortiADC version 7.1.0, version 7.0.0 through 7.0.2 and version 6.2.4 and below allows an authenticated attacker to retrieve files with specific extension from the underlying Linux system via crafted HTTP requests. | ||||
| CVE-2022-33875 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiadc | 2024-11-21 | 5.1 Medium |
| An improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiADC version 7.1.0, version 7.0.0 through 7.0.2 and version 6.2.4 and below allows an authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specifically crafted HTTP requests. | ||||
| CVE-2022-33874 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortitester | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| An improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerabilities [CWE-78] in SSH login components of FortiTester 2.3.0 through 3.9.1, 4.0.0 through 4.2.0, 7.0.0 through 7.1.0 may allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary command in the underlying shell. | ||||
| CVE-2022-33873 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortitester | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 Medium |
| An improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerabilities [CWE-78] in Console login components of FortiTester 2.3.0 through 3.9.1, 4.0.0 through 4.2.0, 7.0.0 through 7.1.0 may allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary command in the underlying shell. | ||||
| CVE-2022-33872 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortitester | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| An improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerabilities [CWE-78] in Telnet login components of FortiTester 2.3.0 through 3.9.1, 4.0.0 through 4.2.0, 7.0.0 through 7.1.0 may allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary command in the underlying shell. | ||||