| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. Starting in version 4.7.0 and prior to version 4.9.2, when the `verifyMultiProof`, `verifyMultiProofCalldata`, `procesprocessMultiProof`, or `processMultiProofCalldat` functions are in use, it is possible to construct merkle trees that allow forging a valid multiproof for an arbitrary set of leaves.
A contract may be vulnerable if it uses multiproofs for verification and the merkle tree that is processed includes a node with value 0 at depth 1 (just under the root). This could happen inadvertedly for balanced trees with 3 leaves or less, if the leaves are not hashed. This could happen deliberately if a malicious tree builder includes such a node in the tree.
A contract is not vulnerable if it uses single-leaf proving (`verify`, `verifyCalldata`, `processProof`, or `processProofCalldata`), or if it uses multiproofs with a known tree that has hashed leaves. Standard merkle trees produced or validated with the @openzeppelin/merkle-tree library are safe.
The problem has been patched in version 4.9.2.
Some workarounds are available. For those using multiproofs: When constructing merkle trees hash the leaves and do not insert empty nodes in your trees. Using the @openzeppelin/merkle-tree package eliminates this issue. Do not accept user-provided merkle roots without reconstructing at least the first level of the tree. Verify the merkle tree structure by reconstructing it from the leaves. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
| Mattermost is grouping calls in the /metrics endpoint by id and reports that id in the response. Since this id is the channelID, the public /metrics endpoint is revealing channelIDs.
|
| In onNullBinding of TileLifecycleManager.java, there is a possible way to launch an activity from the background due to a missing null check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| In startNextMatchingActivity of ActivityTaskManagerService.java, there is a possible way to bypass the restrictions on starting activities from the background due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| In JetBrains TeamCity before 2024.03 server administrators could remove arbitrary files from the server by installing tools |
| In JetBrains TeamCity before 2024.03 xXE was possible in the Maven build steps detector |
| In JetBrains TeamCity before 2024.03 2FA could be bypassed by providing a special URL parameter |
| In JetBrains TeamCity before 2024.03 authenticated users without administrative permissions could register other users when self-registration was disabled |
| In JetBrains TeamCity before 2022.04.7, 2022.10.6, 2023.05.6, 2023.11.5 an XSS could be executed via certain report grouping and filtering operations |
| In JetBrains TeamCity before 2022.04.7, 2022.10.6, 2023.05.6, 2023.11.5, 2024.03.2 a third-party agent could impersonate a cloud agent |
| In JetBrains TeamCity before 2024.03.1 commit status publisher didn't check project scope of the GitHub App token |
| In JetBrains TeamCity between 2024.03 and 2024.03.1 several stored XSS in the available updates page were possible |
| In JetBrains TeamCity before 2022.04.7, 2022.10.6, 2023.05.6, 2023.11.5 stored XSS via OAuth connection settings was possible |
| In JetBrains TeamCity before 2023.11 stored XSS during restore from backup was possible |
| In JetBrains TeamCity before 2022.04.7, 2022.10.6, 2023.05.6, 2023.11.5, 2024.03.2 path traversal allowing to read files from server was possible |
| In JetBrains TeamCity before 2022.04.7, 2022.10.6, 2023.05.6, 2023.11.5 several Stored XSS in code inspection reports were possible |
| In JetBrains TeamCity before 2022.04.7, 2022.10.6, 2023.05.6, 2023.11.5 improper access control in Pull Requests and Commit status publisher build features was possible |
| In JetBrains TeamCity before 2023.11 users with access to the agent machine might obtain permissions of the user running the agent process |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC CP 343-1 (6GK7343-1EX30-0XE0) (All versions), SIMATIC CP 343-1 Lean (6GK7343-1CX10-0XE0) (All versions), SIPLUS NET CP 343-1 (6AG1343-1EX30-7XE0) (All versions), SIPLUS NET CP 343-1 Lean (6AG1343-1CX10-2XE0) (All versions). Affected products incorrectly validate TCP sequence numbers. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to create a denial of service condition by injecting spoofed TCP RST packets. |
