| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2022-32250. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2022-32250. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2022-32250 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2021-32850. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2021-32850. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2021-32850 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. Consult IDs: CVE-2021-36686. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2021-36686. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2021-36686 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2019-11599. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2019-11599. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2019-11599 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2015-1197. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2015-1197. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2015-1197 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA based off of CNT 3. Further investigation determined that there was a secure method for using the directive. Notes: none. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not an exploitable issue. Notes: none. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-6496, CVE-2012-6497. Reason: this candidate was intended for one issue, but the candidate was publicly used to label concerns about multiple products. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2012-6496 and CVE-2012-6497 to determine which ID is appropriate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2011-4858. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2011-4858. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2011-4858 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. |
| A Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the chat functionality of parisneo/lollms-webui in the latest version. This vulnerability allows an attacker to inject malicious scripts via chat messages, which are then executed in the context of the user's browser. |
| There is a denial of service vulnerability in the Content-Disposition parsingcomponent of Rack fixed in 2.0.9.2, 2.1.4.2, 2.2.4.1, 3.0.0.1. This could allow an attacker to craft an input that can cause Content-Disposition header parsing in Rackto take an unexpected amount of time, possibly resulting in a denial ofservice attack vector. This header is used typically used in multipartparsing. Any applications that parse multipart posts using Rack (virtuallyall Rails applications) are impacted. |