Export limit exceeded: 381540 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (381540 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-75583 | 1 Ridafkih | 1 Keeper.sh | 2026-08-20 | 3.5 Low |
| keeper.sh's calendar module version prior to 2.18.14 contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) guard bypass vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers to reach private network addresses by exploiting a DNS rebinding attack against the two-phase URL validation and connection flow. The SSRF guard validates a hostname's resolved IP addresses but discards them before the actual HTTP connection is opened, allowing an attacker who controls authoritative DNS to return a public address during validation and a private address during the subsequent independent socket-level DNS resolution, causing the guard to pass while the outbound connection reaches internal infrastructure such as cloud instance metadata endpoints. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13942 | 1 Rockchip | 1 Rk3588s | 2026-08-20 | 7.6 High |
| Secure BootROM of RK3588s SoC is vulnerable to a time-of-check to time-of-use attack in case of booting from external media (SPI NOR or NAND, EMMC or SD). The code reads the header of the next-stage loader twice. The header contains hashes of the executable modules and is signed with a private key, the public part of which is verified against the SHA256 digest blown in the OTP. The first read is only partial and contains only the hashes of the executable modules. The second is complete, including the header signature. Although the header is verified based on the fully read data, the authenticity of the executable modules is checked against the partial data from the first read. An attacker with physical access to a device containing RK3588s SoC can easily modify the next-stage loader data on-the-fly using a low-cost SD-card or SPI NOR/NAND or EMMC emulator. Even a simple ultra low-cost circuit comprising two memory chips (containing the same data but different headers - the original and the modified one) and a multiplexer can be used to carry out an attack. This can lead to arbitrary code execution with the highest privileges available (EL3). This issue affects RK3588s: RK3588s SoC BootROM (secure) 350B20210512V100 and possibly others. As remediation apply mitigations per vendor instructions or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable https://www.rock-chips.com/a/en/products/RK35_Series/2022/0926/1660.html | ||||
| CVE-2026-50173 | 1 Rheosoph | 1 Flow-like | 2026-08-20 | N/A |
| Flow-Like is a platform for building end-to-end use cases. Prior to version 1.0.4, `GET /api/v1/apps/{app_id}/invoke/presign` grants Azure Blob Storage SAS credentials with write and delete access to app content to any app member that has `ExecuteEvents`, even when that member lacks `ReadFiles` and `WriteFiles`. The route treats file permissions as optional after the `ExecuteEvents` gate. When the caller has neither file permission, it selects `CredentialsAccess::InvokeNone`. In the Azure credential provider, `InvokeNone` still mints a `content_sas_token` for `apps/{app_id}` with `sp=rwdl`, plus user-content and log SAS tokens. The returned shared credential is enough for the low-privilege caller to directly write or delete blobs under the app content prefix. Version 1.0.4 patches the issue. Flow-Like Studio and the hosted Flow-Like Web App are not affected. These deployments use AWS-backed storage. Self-hosted deployments are only affected if they use Azure Blob Storage as the storage backend. In affected deployments, the issue only applies to authenticated app members who have workflow execution permissions but should not have app file write/delete permissions. Users of affected self-hosted Azure deployments should update to version 1.0.4 or the latest dev branch. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14600 | 1 Vsdesk | 1 Vsdesk | 2026-08-20 | N/A |
| An insecure deserialization vulnerability in vsDesk allows a remote attacker to gain unauthorized administrative access. By manipulating application configuration data, an attacker can force the system to authenticate against an arbitrary LDAP server and provision a new administrative account. Apply patch from vendor https://vsdesk.ru/ . Versions 14.0402 and on have the patch. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75618 | 1 Tp-link | 2 Tapo C100 V5, Tapo C101 V5 | 2026-08-20 | N/A |
| Tapo C100/C101 V5 contains a null pointer dereference vulnerability in the RTSP service. An attacker on the local network can send specially crafted requests that cause the service to dereference an invalid pointer, resulting in a service crash and device reboot. Successful exploitation can disrupt live video streaming functionality and cause a temporary denial-of-service condition. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75619 | 1 Tp-link | 2 Tapo C100 V5, Tapo C101 V5 | 2026-08-20 | N/A |
| Tapo C100/C101 V5 contains a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the RTSP service. An authenticated attacker on the local network can send specially crafted RTSP frame data containing oversized length values, resulting in out-of-bounds heap writes. Successful exploitation can crash the RTSP service and trigger a device reboot, resulting in a temporary denial-of-service condition. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22306 | 1 Ozols Grupa | 1 Ozols | 2026-08-20 | 10 Critical |
| Download of code without integrity check, inclusion of functionality from untrusted control sphere, and cleartext transmission of sensitive information vulnerability in Ozols Grupa OZOLS on Windows caused by an abandoned auto-update domain. Affected component: the automatic update channel - OzolsSQL client update path, the <db>_update SQL Server Agent job (@subsystem = N'ActiveScripting') and serv_update.vbs. This issue affects OZOLS: before 1.1.1233. | ||||
| CVE-2026-19506 | 1 Rdk | 1 Rdk-b Webui | 2026-08-20 | N/A |
| Race condition in `check.jst` in RDK-B WebUI `rdkb-2025q4-kirkstone.04.10.26` allows a remote attacker to gain unauthorized access via concurrent authentication requests that exploit shared authentication state. | ||||
| CVE-2026-19509 | 1 Rdk | 1 Rdk-b Webui | 2026-08-20 | N/A |
| Improper input validation in `ajaxSet_wireless_network_configuration.jst` in RDK-B WebUI `rdkb-2025q4-kirkstone.04.10.26` allows an authenticated attacker to cause denial of service via a crafted `ssid_number` parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2026-11617 | 1 Tanium | 1 Findings | 2026-08-20 | 3.1 Low |
| Tanium addressed a compression bomb vulnerability in Findings. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76371 | 1 Splunk | 1 Fireamp | 2026-08-20 | 2.7 Low |
| In FireAMP versions below 2.1.15, a user who holds a role that can edit, create, or run playbooks in Splunk SOAR could run the add listitem action in a Safe Mode playbook while that action is listed as read-only, which could allow for unauthorized changes to file lists. The vulnerability is possible because the FireAMP connector action manifest classifies the add listitem action as read-only even though the action updates file lists. For more information see Manage settings for a playbook in Splunk SOAR (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-soar/soar-cloud/build-playbooks/manage-playbooks-and-playbook-settings/manage-settings-for-a-playbook-in-splunk-soar-cloud) in the Splunk documentation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76375 | 1 Splunk | 1 Ad Ldap App For Splunk Soar | 2026-08-20 | 5 Medium |
| In versions below 2.3.8 of the AD LDAP app for Splunk SOAR, a user who holds a role with permission to run actions could expose sensitive credentials by invoking an action that causes the full connector process environment to be written to a persistent debug log file in plaintext. For more information see Run an action in Splunk SOAR (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-soar/soar-on-premises/use-splunk-soar-on-premises/8.6.0/use-the-command-line-interface-to-perform-tasks-in-splunk-soar-on-premises/run-an-action-in-splunk-soar-on-premises). | ||||
| CVE-2026-76376 | 1 Splunk | 1 Aws Iam App For Splunk Soar | 2026-08-20 | 4.3 Medium |
| In versions below 2.1.9 of the AWS IAM app for Splunk SOAR, a user who holds a role with permission to run actions could expose sensitive AWS credentials by invoking an action that accepts the credentials parameter, because the parameter is not masked and is shown in cleartext in the user interface. The information disclosure is possible because the app does not mark the affected action parameter as a password. For more information see Run an action in Splunk SOAR (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-soar/soar-on-premises/use-splunk-soar-on-premises/8.6.0/use-the-command-line-interface-to-perform-tasks-in-splunk-soar-on-premises/run-an-action-in-splunk-soar-on-premises). | ||||
| CVE-2026-76377 | 1 Splunk | 1 Azure Ad Graph App For Splunk Soar | 2026-08-20 | 4.3 Medium |
| In versions below 2.5.3 of the Azure AD Graph app for Splunk SOAR, a user who holds a role with permission to run actions could expose a sensitive password by invoking the reset password action, because the action's temp_password parameter is not masked and is shown in cleartext in the user interface. The information disclosure is possible because the app does not mark the affected action parameter as a password. For more information see Run an action in Splunk SOAR (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-soar/soar-on-premises/use-splunk-soar-on-premises/8.6.0/use-the-command-line-interface-to-perform-tasks-in-splunk-soar-on-premises/run-an-action-in-splunk-soar-on-premises). | ||||
| CVE-2026-76378 | 1 Splunk | 1 Cisco Secure Malware Analytics App For Splunk Soar | 2026-08-20 | 4.3 Medium |
| In versions below 2.4.5 of the Cisco Secure Malware Analytics app for Splunk SOAR, a user who holds a role with permission to run actions could expose a sensitive sample password by invoking the detonate file action, because the action's sample_password parameter is not masked and is shown in cleartext in the user interface. The information disclosure is possible because the app does not mark the affected action parameter as a password. For more information see Run an action in Splunk SOAR (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-soar/soar-on-premises/use-splunk-soar-on-premises/8.6.0/use-the-command-line-interface-to-perform-tasks-in-splunk-soar-on-premises/run-an-action-in-splunk-soar-on-premises). | ||||
| CVE-2026-76401 | 1 Splunk | 1 Splunk Connect For Kafka | 2026-08-20 | 5.9 Medium |
| In Splunk Connect for Kafka versions below 2.2.7, an unauthenticated user who can reach the Kafka Connect Representational State Transfer (REST) API could configure timestamp extraction with a crafted regular expression and matching event data to block a Kafka Connect worker thread, stopping event delivery for the affected connector. The vulnerability is possible because timestamp extraction evaluates customer-supplied regular expressions without a time limit. For more information see Install Splunk Connect for Kafka (https://help.splunk.com/en/data-management/integrate-data-with-add-ons/splunk-connect-for-kafka/2.2/install/install-splunk-connect-for-kafka) and Data ingestion parameters for Splunk Connect for Kafka (https://help.splunk.com/en/data-management/integrate-data-with-add-ons/splunk-connect-for-kafka/2.2/overview/data-ingestion-parameters-for-splunk-connect-for-kafka) in the Splunk documentation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76402 | 1 Splunk | 1 Splunk Connect For Kafka | 2026-08-20 | 8.2 High |
| In Splunk Connect for Kafka versions below 2.2.7, an unauthenticated user who can reach the Kafka Connect Representational State Transfer (REST) API could configure a non-secure Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Event Collector endpoint in Splunk Enterprise that causes the connector to send authentication credentials to an attacker-controlled server, allowing for exposure of credentials that compromise all relevant data sent through the connector and limited alteration of event delivery. The vulnerability is possible because HTTP Event Collector endpoint validation does not require secure transport by default. For more information see Install Splunk Connect for Kafka (https://help.splunk.com/en/data-management/integrate-data-with-add-ons/splunk-connect-for-kafka/2.2/install/install-splunk-connect-for-kafka), Data ingestion parameters for Splunk Connect for Kafka (https://help.splunk.com/en/data-management/integrate-data-with-add-ons/splunk-connect-for-kafka/2.2/overview/data-ingestion-parameters-for-splunk-connect-for-kafka), and Set up and use HTTP Event Collector with configuration files (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/get-data-in/get-started-with-getting-data-in/9.4/get-data-with-http-event-collector/set-up-and-use-http-event-collector-with-configuration-files) in the Splunk documentation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76403 | 1 Splunk | 1 Splunk Connect For Kafka | 2026-08-20 | 7.4 High |
| In Splunk Connect for Kafka versions below 2.2.7, an unauthenticated user positioned in the network path could read or alter all relevant data sent from the connector when Kerberos authentication is used with Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Event Collector in Splunk Enterprise. The vulnerability is possible because the Kerberos authentication path does not apply the configured certificate validation options when it builds the HTTP client. For more information see Install Splunk Connect for Kafka (https://help.splunk.com/en/data-management/integrate-data-with-add-ons/splunk-connect-for-kafka/2.2/install/install-splunk-connect-for-kafka), Security configurations for Splunk Connect for Kafka (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/get-data-in/splunk-connect-for-kafka/2.2/configure/security-configurations-for-splunk-connect-for-kafka), and Set up and use HTTP Event Collector with configuration files (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/get-data-in/get-started-with-getting-data-in/9.4/get-data-with-http-event-collector/set-up-and-use-http-event-collector-with-configuration-files) in the Splunk documentation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76405 | 1 Splunk | 1 Splunk On-call (victorops) | 2026-08-20 | 4.3 Medium |
| In Splunk On-Call (VictorOps) app versions below 1.0.43 on Splunkbase, a user who does not hold the "admin" or "power" Splunk roles could read a partially masked Application Programming Interface (API) key from the App Key Value Store (KV Store). The exposure is possible because the Splunk On-Call (VictorOps) app does not fully mask the API key before storing it in a KV Store collection that the user can read. For more information see About the app key value store (https://help.splunk.com/en/data-management/splunk-enterprise-admin-manual/9.2/administer-the-app-key-value-store/about-the-app-key-value-store) in the Splunk documentation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-73542 | 1 Seiko Epson Corporation | 1 Multiple Seiko Epson Printers And Scanners | 2026-08-20 | 3.7 Low |
| Multiple SEIKO EPSON printers and scanners contain revoked root certificates. A man-in-the-middle attack may allow an attacker to obtain communication data transmitted by the product. As for the details of the affected products and versions, refer to the vendor's information. | ||||